Supercompact cardinal explained

In set theory, a supercompact cardinal is a type of large cardinal independently introduced by Solovay and Reinhardt.[1] They display a variety of reflection properties.

Formal definition

If

λ

is any ordinal,

\kappa

is

λ

-supercompact
means that there exists an elementary embedding

j

from the universe

V

into a transitive inner model

M

with critical point

\kappa

,

j(\kappa)>λ

and

{}λM\subseteqM.

That is,

M

contains all of its

λ

-sequences. Then

\kappa

is supercompact means that it is

λ

-supercompact for all ordinals

λ

.

Alternatively, an uncountable cardinal

\kappa

is supercompact if for every

A

such that

\vertA\vert\geq\kappa

there exists a normal measure over

[A]<\kappa

, in the following sense.

[A]<\kappa

is defined as follows:

[A]<\kappa:=\{x\subseteqA\mid\vertx\vert<\kappa\}

.

U

over

[A]<\kappa

is fine if it is

\kappa

-complete and

\{x\in[A]<\kappa\mida\inx\}\inU

, for every

a\inA

. A normal measure over

[A]<\kappa

is a fine ultrafilter

U

over

[A]<\kappa

with the additional property that every function

f:[A]<\kappa\toA

such that

\{x\in[A]<\kappa|f(x)\inx\}\inU

is constant on a set in

U

. Here "constant on a set in

U

" means that there is

a\inA

such that

\{x\in[A]<|f(x)=a\}\inU

.

Properties

Supercompact cardinals have reflection properties. If a cardinal with some property (say a 3-huge cardinal) that is witnessed by a structure of limited rank exists above a supercompact cardinal

\kappa

, then a cardinal with that property exists below

\kappa

. For example, if

\kappa

is supercompact and the generalized continuum hypothesis (GCH) holds below

\kappa

then it holds everywhere because a bijection between the powerset of

\nu

and a cardinal at least

\nu++

would be a witness of limited rank for the failure of GCH at

\nu

so it would also have to exist below

\nu

.

Finding a canonical inner model for supercompact cardinals is one of the major problems of inner model theory.

The least supercompact cardinal is the least

\kappa

such that for every structure

(M,R1,\ldots,Rn)

with cardinality of the domain

\vertM\vert\geq\kappa

, and for every
1
\Pi
1
sentence

\phi

such that

(M,R1,\ldots,Rn)\vDash\phi

, there exists a substructure

(M',R1\vertM,\ldots,Rn\vertM)

with smaller domain (i.e.

\vertM'\vert<\vertM\vert

) that satisfies

\phi

.[2]

Supercompactness has a combinatorial characterization similar to the property of being ineffable. Let

P\kappa(A)

be the set of all nonempty subsets of

A

which have cardinality

<\kappa

. A cardinal

\kappa

is supercompact iff for every set

A

(equivalently every cardinal

\alpha

), for every function

f:P\kappa(A)\toP\kappa(A)

, if

f(X)\subseteqX

for all

X\inP\kappa(A)

, then there is some

B\subseteqA

such that

\{X\midf(X)=B\capX\}

is stationary.[3]

Magidor obtained a variant of the tree property which holds for an inaccessible cardinal iff it is supercompact.[4]

See also

References

. Jech, Thomas. Set theory, third millennium edition (revised and expanded). Springer. 2002. 3-540-44085-2. Thomas Jech.

. Akihiro Kanamori. 2003. Springer. The Higher Infinite : Large Cardinals in Set Theory from Their Beginnings. The Higher Infinite . 2nd. 3-540-00384-3.

Citations

Notes and References

  1. A. Kanamori, "Kunen and set theory", pp.2450--2451. Topology and its Applications, vol. 158 (2011).
  2. Magidor . M. . Menachem Magidor. On the Role of Supercompact and Extendible Cardinals in Logic. 1971. 147–157. Israel Journal of Mathematics. 10. 2. 10.1007/BF02771565 .
  3. M. Magidor, Combinatorial Characterization of Supercompact Cardinals, pp.281--282. Proceedings of the American Mathematical Society, vol. 42 no. 1, 1974.
  4. S. Hachtman, S. Sinapova, "The super tree property at the successor of a singular". Israel Journal of Mathematics, vol 236, iss. 1 (2020), pp.473--500.