Structure–activity relationship explained
The structure–activity relationship (SAR) is the relationship between the chemical structure of a molecule and its biological activity. This idea was first presented by Alexander Crum Brown and Thomas Richard Fraser at least as early as 1868.[1] [2]
The analysis of SAR enables the determination of the chemical group responsible for evoking a target biological effect in the organism. This allows modification of the effect or the potency of a bioactive compound (typically a drug) by changing its chemical structure. Medicinal chemists use the techniques of chemical synthesis to insert new chemical groups into the biomedical compound and test the modifications for their biological effects.
This method was refined to build mathematical relationships between the chemical structure and the biological activity, known as quantitative structure–activity relationships (QSAR). A related term is structure affinity relationship (SAFIR).
Structure-biodegradability relationship
The large number of synthetic organic chemicals currently in production presents a major challenge for timely collection of detailed environmental data on each compound. The concept of structure biodegradability relationships (SBR) has been applied to explain variability in persistence among organic chemicals in the environment. Early attempts generally consisted of examining the degradation of a homologous series of structurally related compounds under identical conditions with a complex "universal" inoculum, typically derived from numerous sources.[3] This approach revealed that the nature and positions of substituents affected the apparent biodegradability of several chemical classes, with resulting general themes, such as halogens generally conferring persistence under aerobic conditions.[4] Subsequently, more quantitative approaches have been developed using principles of QSAR and often accounting for the role of sorption (bioavailability) in chemical fate.[5]
See also
External links
Notes and References
- Brown . Alexander Crum . Alexander Crum Brown . Fraser . Thomas Richard . Thomas Richard Fraser . V.—On the Connection between Chemical Constitution and Physiological Action. Part. I.—On the Physiological Action of the Salts of the Ammonium Bases, derived from Strychnia, Brucia, Thebaia, Codeia, Morphia, and Nicotia . Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh . 1868 . 25 . 1 . 151–203 . 10.1017/S0080456800028155 . There can be no reasonable doubt that a relation exists between the physiological action of a substance and its chemical composition ... we are not aware that any approach has been made to the statement of a law connecting the physiological action of a substance with its chemical constitution. . yes . extract.
- Brown . Alexander Crum . Alexander Crum Brown . Fraser . Thomas Richard . Thomas Richard Fraser . XX.—On the Connection between Chemical Constitution and Physiological Action. Part II.—On the Physiological Action of the Ammonium Bases derived from Atropia and Conia . Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh . 1869 . 25 . 2 . 693–739 . 10.1017/S0080456800035377.
- Sims . Gerald K. . Sommers . Lee E. . Biodegradation of pyridine derivatives in soil suspensions . Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry . 1986 . 5 . 6 . 503–509 . 10.1002/etc.5620050601 . 93976768.
- Alexander . Martin . Lustigman . Bonnie K. . Effect of chemical structure on microbial degradation of substituted benzenes . Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry . 1966 . 14 . 4 . 410–413 . 10.1021/jf60146a022 . 98668501.
- Mani . S.V. . Connell . D.W. . Braddock . R.D. . Structure activity relationships for the prediction of biodegradability of environmental pollutants . Critical Reviews in Environmental Control . 1991 . 21 . 3–4 . 217–236 . 10.1080/10643389109388416 . 95802805.
