Strikethrough Explained

Strikethrough is a typographical presentation of words with a horizontal line through their center, resulting in

text like this. Contrary to censored or sanitized (redacted) texts, the words remain readable. This presentation signifies one of two meanings. In ink-written, typewritten, or other non-erasable text, the words are a mistake and not meant for inclusion. When used on a computer screen, however, it indicates deleted information, as popularized by Microsoft Word's revision and track changes features.[1]

Uses

Marking errors

Strikethrough is primarily used to mark text that is mistaken or to be removed.

Highlighting

In medieval manuscripts such as the Domesday Book, "strikethrough" of text with red ink often functions as highlighting similar to modern underline.[2]

Computer representations

HTML

The HTML presentational inline element for strikethrough is <strike> or <s>. This element was, however, deprecated in the 1999 HTML 4.01 standard, and replaced by the <del> tag, a semantic element representing deleted text, which user agents (typically web browsers) often render as a strikethrough.[3] [4]

In the HTML5 draft, there is no presentational element for strikethrough. However, there are two related semantic elements. Firstly, <s>, that is strikethrough in HTML 3 and 4, is redefined to mark text that is no longer correct, and secondly, <del> marks text that has been deleted, as it does in HTML 4.01.[5] [6]

Other markup symbols

CSS

In cascading style sheets (CSS) strikethrough is controlled using the text-decoration property, and specified by the line-through value of that property. For example, <span style="text-decoration: line-through;">ABCD efghi</span> renders like this:

ABCD efghi

To maintain backwards compatibility, the following can be added to the CSS: strike {text-decoration:line-through;} The example above could then be written like this: <strike>ABCD efghi</strike>, which is compatible with HTML 4. In HTML 5, this: <del>ABCD efghi</del> also produces the same result, although the use of CSS is preferred and the del tag carries a semantic interpretation not present in the purely stylistic s and strike tags.

Unicode

Combining characters

In plain text scenarios where markup cannot be used, Unicode offers a number of combining characters that achieve similar effects.

The "combining long stroke overlay" (U+0336) results in a stroke across the text (may or may not be unbroken depending on the typeface used):

A̶B̶C̶D̶ ̶e̶f̶g̶h̶i̶while the "combining short stroke overlay" (U+0335) results in individually struck out characters:

A̵B̵C̵D̵ ̵e̵f̵g̵h̵i̵Similarly, the "combining short solidus overlay" (U+0337) results in diagonally struck out letters:

A̷B̷C̷D̷ ̷e̷f̷g̷h̷i̷as does the "combining long solidus overlay" (U+0338), which produces longer diagonal strokes:

A̸B̸C̸D̸ ̸e̸f̸g̸h̸i̸

Specific struck-through characters

A number of characters that have the visual appearance of struck-through characters exist in Unicode, including ⟨ƀ⟩, ⟨Đ⟩, ⟨Ð⟩, ⟨Ǥ⟩, ⟨Ħ⟩, ⟨Ɨ⟩, ⟨Ɉ⟩, ⟨Ł⟩, ⟨Ɵ⟩, ⟨⟩, ⟨Ŧ⟩, ⟨Ʉ⟩, ⟨Ƶ⟩, ⟨ƻ⟩, ⟨ʡ⟩, ⟨ʢ⟩, ⟨Ғ⟩, ⟨Ҟ⟩, ⟨Ұ⟩, and ⟨Ҍ⟩. These usually have specific functions (for example, in the Latin Extended-A character set) or representations and are not intended for general use. However, they are not precomposed characters and have neither canonical nor compatibility decompositions. This issue has created security considerations since "precomposed" characters like U+019F and sequences like U+004F U+0335 or U+004F U+0336 often cause visual confusion (compare ⟨Ɵ⟩, ⟨O̵⟩ and ⟨O̶⟩). Unicode has acknowledged this issue and has proposed a standardized method for counteraction.[9] [10]

For slashed letters in an orthography, unitary letters are provided by Unicode. The diacritics are used in generic applications, such as math operators which systematically use the solidus overlay to indicate negation.

Double/multiple strikethrough

Double strikethrough is an option in certain word processing applications such as Microsoft Word. There is no generally agreed meaning of double strikethrough, but it may be used as a second level of single strikethrough.

In Japan, double strikethrough is conventionally used (rather than single strikethrough) when striking out text. This is for added clarity, as in complex kanji a single strikethrough may be missed or confused with a stroke in the character.

Double, triple or multiple strikethrough may also (especially formerly) be used as a way of emphasising words.

Research

Since at least 2014, researchers in the area of optical character recognition have attempted to solve the problem of recognizing struck-out text in handwritten documents.[11] [12]

See also

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Strikethrough and the power of defaults. 2022-02-02. reproof. en.
  2. See, e.g., this image from the British National Archives' Focus on the Domesday Book.
  3. http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/present/graphics.html#h-15.2.1 15.2.1 Font style elements: the TT, I, B, BIG, SMALL, STRIKE, S, and U elements
  4. http://www.w3.org/TR/1999/REC-html401-19991224/struct/text.html#edef-del 9.4 Marking document changes: The INS and DEL elements
  5. http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/text-level-semantics.html#the-s-element 4.5.5 The s element
  6. http://www.w3.org/TR/html5/edits.html#the-del-element 4.6.2 The del element
  7. Web site: GitHub Flavored Markdown.
  8. Web site: Add formatting to your Google Chat messages - Computer - Google Chat Help . 2024-03-01 . support.google.com.
  9. The Unicode Consortium, The Unicode Standard, Chapter 2, Page 44, Non-decomposition of Overlaid Diacritics
  10. The Unicode Consortium, Unicode Technical Standard #39: Unicode Security Mechanisms, chapter Confusable Detection
  11. Book: 10.1109/ICFHR.2014.113. 978-1-4799-4334-0. An Approach of Strike-Through Text Identification from Handwritten Documents. 2014 14th International Conference on Frontiers in Handwriting Recognition. 2014. Adak. Chandranath. Chaudhuri. Bidyut B.. 643–648. 5364504.
  12. 10.1016/j.patcog.2016.07.032. An approach for detecting and cleaning of struck-out handwritten text. 2017. Chaudhuri. Bidyut B.. Adak. Chandranath. Pattern Recognition. 61. 282–294. 2017PatRe..61..282C.