Stock market cycle explained

Stock market cycles are proposed patterns that proponents argue may exist in stock markets. Many such cycles have been proposed, such as tying stock market changes to political leadership, or fluctuations in commodity prices. Some stock market designs are universally recognized (e.g., rotations between the dominance of value investing or growth stocks). However, many academics and professional investors are skeptical of any theory claiming to identify or predict stock market cycles precisely. Some sources argue identifying any such patterns as a "cycle" is a misnomer, because of their non-cyclical nature.[1] Economists using efficient-market hypothesis say that asset prices reflect all available information meaning that it is impossible to systematically beat the market by taking advantage of such cycles.[2]

Changes in stock returns are primarily determined by external factors such as the U.S. monetary policy, the economy, inflation, exchange rates, and socioeconomic conditions (e.g., the 2020-2021 coronavirus pandemic).[3] Intellectual capital does not affect a company stock's current earnings. Intellectual capital contributes to a stock's return growth.[4]

Economist Milton Friedman believed that for the most part, excluding very large supply shocks, business declines are more of a monetary phenomenon.[5] Despite the often-applied term cycles, the fluctuations in business economic activity do not exhibit uniform or predictable periodicity.[6]

According to standard theory, a decrease in price will result in less supply and more demand, while an increase in price will do the opposite. This works well for most assets but it often works in reverse for stocks due to the mistake many investors make of buying high in a state of euphoria and selling low in a state of fear or panic as a result of the herding instinct. In case an increase in price causes an increase in demand, or a decrease in price causes an increase in supply, this destroys the expected negative feedback loop and prices will be unstable.[7] This can be seen in a bubble or crash.[8]

Publications

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. Mankiw . Gregory . 1989 . Real Business Cycles: A New Keynesian Perspective . The Journal of Economic Perspectives . 3 . 3 . 79–90 . 0895-3309 . 1942761 . 10.1257/jep.3.3.79. free .
  2. copied content from Efficient-market hypothesis; see that page's history for attribution
  3. https://www.cnbc.com/2020/11/03/stock-futures-open-flat-after-tuesdays-rally-as-traders-await-us-election-results.html
  4. copied from Wikipedia article Intellectual capital The Impact of Intellectual Capital on a Firm’s Stock Return | Evidence from Indonesia | Ari Barkah Djamil, Dominique Razafindrambinina, Caroline Tandeans | Journal of Business Studies Quarterly 2013, Volume 5, Number 2
  5. Book: Schwartz, Anna J.. Money in Historical Perspective. 1987 . University of Chicago Press. 978-0226742281 . 24–77 .
  6. copied content from Business Cycle; see that page's history for attribution
  7. Book: Wilcox . Jarrod W. . Fabozzi . Frank J. . Financial Advice and Investment Decisions: A Manifesto for Change . . November 20, 2013. 9781118415320 .
  8. copied content from Market trend; see that page's history for attribution
  9. http://libertystreeteconomics.newyorkfed.org/2013/09/consumer-confidence-a-useful-indicator-of-the-labor-market.html Federal Reserve Bank of New York, Consumer Confidence: A Useful Indicator of . . . the Labor Market?
  10. Web site: MONITORING AND PREDICTION OF BUSINESS CYCLE . PDF. Andrea Tkáčová. Barbora Gontkovičová. Emília Duľová Spišáková. Researchgate.net.
  11. Web site: A different way to review the Chicago Fed National Activity Index. Chicagofed.org. 16 December 2018.
  12. Web site: Background on the Chicago Fed National Activity Index. Chicagofed.org. 16 December 2018.
  13. Web site: Chicago Fed National Activity Index: Diffusion Index. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago. 1 May 1967. FRED, Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. 16 December 2018.
  14. Web site: Aruoba-Diebold-Scotti Business Conditions Index - weekly macroeconomic activity - Philadelphia Fed . 2013-09-29 . https://web.archive.org/web/20131017063849/http://www.philadelphiafed.org/research%2Dand%2Ddata/real%2Dtime%2Dcenter/business%2Dconditions%2Dindex/ . 2013-10-17 . dead .
  15. Web site: Aruoba-Diebold-Scotti Business Conditions Index (12/08/2017 - 12/08/2018). Philadelphiafed.org. 16 December 2018.
  16. 10.1162/003465398557320. Predicting U.S. Recessions: Financial Variables as Leading Indicators. 1998. Estrella. Arturo. Mishkin. Frederic S.. Review of Economics and Statistics. 80. 45–61. 11641969.
  17. Bank of America, Merrilly Lynch, RIC-Themes and Charts | 21 February 2017, page 12
  18. Web site: BofA: The Economic 'Global Wave' Just Turned Positive And That's Extremely Bullish For Stocks. Sam. Ro. Business Insider. 16 December 2018.
  19. Web site: Abdullah Sheikh, Director of Research, Strategic Investment Advisory Group (SIAG). Regime change: Implications of macroeconomic shifts on asset class and portfolio performance . 2011. Jpmorgan.com.