Stimulated Raman adiabatic passage explained

Stimulated Raman adiabatic passage (STIRAP) is a process that permits transfer of a population between two applicable quantum states via at least two coherent electromagnetic (light) pulses.[1] [2] These light pulses drive the transitions of the three level Ʌ atom or multilevel system.[3] [4] The process is a form of state-to-state coherent control.

Population transfer in three level Ʌ atom

Consider the description of three level Ʌ atom having ground states

|g1\rangle

and

|g2\rangle

(for simplicity suppose that the energies of the ground states are the same) and excited state

|e\rangle

. Suppose in the beginning the total population is in the ground state

|g1\rangle

. Here the logic for transformation of the population from ground state

|g1\rangle

to

|g2\rangle

is that initially the unpopulated states

|g2\rangle

and

|e\rangle

couple, afterward superposition of states

|g2\rangle

and

|e\rangle

couple to the state

|g1\rangle

. Thereby a state is formed that permits the transformation of the population into state

|g2\rangle

without populating the excited state

|e\rangle

. This process of transforming the population without populating the excited state is called the stimulated Raman adiabatic passage.[5]

Three level theory

Consider states

|1\rangle

,

|2\rangle

and

|3\rangle

with the goal of transferring population initially in state

|1\rangle

to state

|3\rangle

without populating state

|2\rangle

. Allow the system to interact with two coherent radiation fields, the pump and Stokes fields. Let the pump field couple only states

|1\rangle

and

|2\rangle

and the Stokes field couple only states

|2\rangle

and

|3\rangle

, for instance due to far-detuning or selection rules. Denote the Rabi frequencies and detunings of the pump and Stokes couplings by

\OmegaP/S

and

\DeltaP/S

. Setting the energy of state

|2\rangle

to zero, the rotating wave Hamiltonian is given by

HRWA=-\hbar\DeltaP|1\rangle\langle1|+\hbar\DeltaS|3\rangle\langle3|+

\hbar\OmegaP
2

(|1\rangle\langle2|+h.c.)+

\hbar\OmegaS
2

(|3\rangle\langle2|+h.c.)

The energy ordering of the states is not critical, and here it is taken so that

E1<E2<E3

only for concreteness. Ʌ and V configurations can be realized by changing the signs of the detunings. Shifting the energy zero by

\DeltaP

allows the Hamiltonian to be written in the more configuration independent form

HRWA=\hbar\begin{pmatrix}0&

\OmegaP
2

&0\\

\OmegaP
2

&\Delta&

\OmegaS
2

\\ 0&

\OmegaS
2

&\delta\end{pmatrix}

Here

\Delta

and

\delta

denote the single and two-photon detunings respectively. STIRAP is achieved on two-photon resonance

\delta=0

. Focusing to this case, the energies upon diagonalization of

HRWA

are given by

E0,\pm=0,

\Delta\pm\sqrt{\Delta2+\Omega2
}

where

\Omega2=

2
\Omega
P

+

2
\Omega
S
. Solving for the

E0

eigenstate

(c1c2

T
c
3)
, it is seen to obey the condition

c2=0,\OmegaPc1+\OmegaSc3=0

The first condition reveals that the critical two-photon resonance condition yields a dark state which is a superposition of only the initial and target state. By defining the mixing angle

\tan\theta=\OmegaP/\OmegaS

and utilizing the normalization condition
2
|c
1|

+

2
|c
3|

=1

, the second condition can be used to express this dark state as

|dark\rangle=\cos\theta|1\rangle-\sin\theta|3\rangle

From this, the STIRAP counter-intuitive pulse sequence can be deduced. At

\theta=0

which corresponds the presence of only the Stokes field (

\OmegaS\gg\OmegaP

), the dark state exactly corresponds to the initial state

|1\rangle

. As the mixing angle is rotated from

0

to

\pi/2

, the dark state smoothly interpolates from purely state

|1\rangle

to purely state

|3\rangle

. The latter

\theta=\pi/2

case corresponds to the opposing limit of a strong pump field (

\OmegaP\gg\OmegaS

). Practically, this corresponds to applying Stokes and pump field pulses to the system with a slight delay between while still maintaining significant temporal overlap between pulses; the delay provides the correct limiting behavior and the overlap ensures adiabatic evolution. A population initially prepared in state

|1\rangle

will adiabatically follow the dark state and end up in state

|3\rangle

without populating state

|2\rangle

as desired. The pulse envelopes can take on fairly arbitrary shape so long as the time rate of change of the mixing angle is slow compared to the energy splitting with respect to the non-dark states. This adiabatic condition takes its simplest form at the single-photon resonance condition

\Delta=0

where it can be expressed as

\Omega(t)\gg|

\theta

(t)|=

|\Omega
\Omega
P(t)-\OmegaP(t)
\Omega
S(t)|
S(t)
\Omega(t)2

Notes and References

  1. Vitanov. Nikolay V.. Rangelov. Andon A.. Shore. Bruce W.. Bergmann. Klaas. Stimulated Raman adiabatic passage in physics, chemistry, and beyond. Reviews of Modern Physics. 89. 1. 2017. 015006 . 0034-6861. 10.1103/RevModPhys.89.015006. 1605.00224. 2017RvMP...89a5006V. 118612686 .
  2. Bergmann. Klaas. Vitanov. Nikolay V.. Shore. Bruce W.. Perspective: Stimulated Raman adiabatic passage: The status after 25 years. The Journal of Chemical Physics. 142. 17. 2015. 170901. 0021-9606. 10.1063/1.4916903. 25956078 . 2015JChPh.142q0901B. free.
  3. Unanyan. R.. Fleischhauer. M.. Shore. B.W.. Bergmann. K.. Robust creation and phase-sensitive probing of superposition states via stimulated Raman adiabatic passage (STIRAP) with degenerate dark states. Optics Communications. 155. 1–3. 1998. 144–154. 0030-4018. 10.1016/S0030-4018(98)00358-7. 1998OptCo.155..144U.
  4. Book: Schwager, Heike . A quantum memory for light in nuclear spin of quantum dot. 2008 . Max-Planck-Institute of Quantum Optics.
  5. Marte. P.. Zoller. P.. Hall. J. L.. Coherent atomic mirrors and beam splitters by adiabatic passage in multilevel systems. Physical Review A. 44. 7. 1991. R4118–R4121. 1050-2947. 10.1103/PhysRevA.44.R4118. 9906446 . 1991PhRvA..44.4118M.