Spectral risk measure explained

A Spectral risk measure is a risk measure given as a weighted average of outcomes where bad outcomes are, typically, included with larger weights. A spectral risk measure is a function of portfolio returns and outputs the amount of the numeraire (typically a currency) to be kept in reserve. A spectral risk measure is always a coherent risk measure, but the converse does not always hold. An advantage of spectral measures is the way in which they can be related to risk aversion, and particularly to a utility function, through the weights given to the possible portfolio returns.[1]

Definition

X

(denoting the portfolio payoff). Then a spectral risk measure

M\phi:l{L}\toR

where

\phi

is non-negative, non-increasing, right-continuous, integrable function defined on

[0,1]

such that
1
\int
0

\phi(p)dp=1

is defined by

M\phi(X)=

1
-\int
0

\phi(p)

-1
F
X

(p)dp

where

FX

is the cumulative distribution function for X.[2]

If there are

S

equiprobable outcomes with the corresponding payoffs given by the order statistics

X1:S,...XS:S

. Let

\phi\inRS

. The measure

M\phi:RSR

defined by

M\phi

S\phi
(X)=-\delta\sum
sX

s:S

is a spectral measure of risk if

\phi\inRS

satisfies the conditions
  1. Nonnegativity:

\phis\geq0

for all

s=1,...,S

,
  1. Normalization:
S\phi
\sum
s=1
,
  1. Monotonicity :

\phis

is non-increasing, that is
\phi
s1
\geq\phi
s2
if

{s1}<{s2}

and

{s1},{s2}\in\{1,...,S\}

.

Properties

Spectral risk measures are also coherent. Every spectral risk measure

\rho:l{L}\toR

satisfies:
  1. Positive Homogeneity: for every portfolio X and positive value

λ>0

,

\rho(λX)=λ\rho(X)

;
  1. Translation-Invariance: for every portfolio X and

\alpha\inR

,

\rho(X+a)=\rho(X)-a

;
  1. Monotonicity: for all portfolios X and Y such that

X\geqY

,

\rho(X)\leq\rho(Y)

;
  1. Sub-additivity: for all portfolios X and Y,

\rho(X+Y)\leq\rho(X)+\rho(Y)

;
  1. Law-Invariance: for all portfolios X and Y with cumulative distribution functions

FX

and

FY

respectively, if

FX=FY

then

\rho(X)=\rho(Y)

;
  1. Comonotonic Additivity: for every comonotonic random variables X and Y,

\rho(X+Y)=\rho(X)+\rho(Y)

. Note that X and Y are comonotonic if for every

\omega1,\omega2\in\Omega:(X(\omega2)-X(\omega1))(Y(\omega2)-Y(\omega1))\geq0

.[3] In some texts the input X is interpreted as losses rather than payoff of a portfolio. In this case, the translation-invariance property would be given by

\rho(X+a)=\rho(X)+a

, and the monotonicity property by

X\geqY\implies\rho(X)\geq\rho(Y)

instead of the above.

Examples

See also

Notes and References

  1. Extreme spectral risk measures: An application to futures clearinghouse margin requirements. John. Cotter. Kevin. Dowd. Journal of Banking & Finance. 30. 12. December 2006. 3469–3485. 10.1016/j.jbankfin.2006.01.008. 1103.5653.
  2. Spectral Risk Measures: Properties and Limitations. Kevin. Dowd. John. Cotter. Ghulam. Sorwar. 2008. CRIS Discussion Paper Series. 2. October 13, 2011.
  3. Spectral risk measures and portfolio selection. 2007. Alexandre. Adam. Mohamed. Houkari. Jean-Paul. Laurent. October 11, 2011.