Specific modulus explained

Specific modulus is a materials property consisting of the elastic modulus per mass density of a material. It is also known as the stiffness to weight ratio or specific stiffness. High specific modulus materials find wide application in aerospace applications where minimum structural weight is required. The dimensional analysis yields units of distance squared per time squared. The equation can be written as:

specificmodulus=E/\rho

where

E

is the elastic modulus and

\rho

is the density.

The utility of specific modulus is to find materials which will produce structures with minimum weight, when the primary design limitation is deflection or physical deformation, rather than load at breaking—this is also known as a "stiffness-driven" structure. Many common structures are stiffness-driven over much of their use, such as airplane wings, bridges, masts, and bicycle frames.

To emphasize the point, consider the issue of choosing a material for building an airplane. Aluminum seems obvious because it is "lighter" than steel, but steel is stronger than aluminum, so one could imagine using thinner steel components to save weight without sacrificing (tensile) strength. The problem with this idea is that there would be a significant sacrifice of stiffness, allowing, e.g., wings to flex unacceptably. Because it is stiffness, not tensile strength, that drives this kind of decision for airplanes, we say that they are stiffness-driven.

The connection details of such structures may be more sensitive to strength (rather than stiffness) issues due to effects of stress risers.

Specific modulus is not to be confused with specific strength, a term that compares strength to density.

Applications

Specific stiffness in tension

The use of specific stiffness in tension applications is straightforward. Both stiffness in tension and total mass for a given length are directly proportional to cross-sectional area. Thus performance of a beam in tension will depend on Young's modulus divided by density.

Specific stiffness in buckling and bending

Specific stiffness can be used in the design of beams subject to bending or Euler buckling, since bending and buckling are stiffness-driven. However, the role that density plays changes depending on the problem's constraints.

Beam with fixed dimensions; goal is weight reduction

Examining the formulas for buckling and deflection, we see that the force required to achieve a given deflection or to achieve buckling depends directly on Young's modulus.

Examining the density formula, we see that the mass of a beam depends directly on the density.

Thus if a beam's cross-sectional dimensions are constrained and weight reduction is the primary goal, performance of the beam will depend on Young's modulus divided by density.

Beam with fixed weight; goal is increased stiffness

By contrast, if a beam's weight is fixed, its cross-sectional dimensions are unconstrained, and increased stiffness is the primary goal, the performance of the beam will depend on Young's modulus divided by either density squared or cubed. This is because a beam's overall stiffness, and thus its resistance to Euler buckling when subjected to an axial load and to deflection when subjected to a bending moment, is directly proportional to both the Young's modulus of the beam's material and the second moment of area (area moment of inertia) of the beam.

Comparing the list of area moments of inertia with formulas for area gives the appropriate relationship for beams of various configurations.

Beam's cross-sectional area increases in two dimensions

Consider a beam whose cross-sectional area increases in two dimensions, e.g. a solid round beam or a solid square beam.

By combining the area and density formulas, we can see that the radius of this beam will vary with approximately the inverse of the square of the density for a given mass.

By examining the formulas for area moment of inertia, we can see that the stiffness of this beam will vary approximately as the fourth power of the radius.

Thus the second moment of area will vary approximately as the inverse of the density squared, and performance of the beam will depend on Young's modulus divided by density squared.

Beam's cross-sectional area increases in one dimension

Consider a beam whose cross-sectional area increases in one dimension, e.g. a thin-walled round beam or a rectangular beam whose height but not width is varied.

By combining the area and density formulas, we can see that the radius or height of this beam will vary with approximately the inverse of the density for a given mass.

By examining the formulas for area moment of inertia, we can see that the stiffness of this beam will vary approximately as the third power of the radius or height.

Thus the second moment of area will vary approximately as the inverse of the cube of the density, and performance of the beam will depend on Young's modulus divided by density cubed.

However, caution must be exercised in using this metric. Thin-walled beams are ultimately limited by local buckling and lateral-torsional buckling. These buckling modes depend on material properties other than stiffness and density, so the stiffness-over-density-cubed metric is at best a starting point for analysis. For example, most wood species score better than most metals on this metric, but many metals can be formed into useful beams with much thinner walls than could be achieved with wood, given wood's greater vulnerability to local buckling. The performance of thin-walled beams can also be greatly modified by relatively minor variations in geometry such as flanges and stiffeners.[1] [2] [3]

Stiffness versus strength in bending

Note that the ultimate strength of a beam in bending depends on the ultimate strength of its material and its section modulus, not its stiffness and second moment of area. Its deflection, however, and thus its resistance to Euler buckling, will depend on these two latter values.

Approximate specific stiffness for various materials

Approximate specific stiffness for various materials. No attempt is made to correct for materials whose stiffness varies with their density.
MaterialYoung's modulus (GPa)Density (g/cm3)Young's modulus per density; specific stiffness (106 m2s−2)Young's modulus per density squared (103 m5kg−1s−2)Young's modulus per density cubed (m8kg−2s−2)Reference
Latex foam, low density, 10% compression[4]
Reversible Assembled Cellular Composite Materials[5] [6]
Self Reprogrammable Mechanical Metamaterials[7] [8]
Latex foam, low density, 40% compression[9]
Latex foam, high density, 10% compression[10]
Latex foam, high density, 40% compression[11]
Silica aerogel, medium density[12]
Rubber (small strain)±0.045±0.145[13] ±0.051±0.05655±0.0621
Expanded polystrene (EPS) foam, low density (1lb/ft3)[14]
Silica aerogel, high density[15]
Expanded polystrene (EPS) foam, medium density (3lb/ft3)[16]
Low-density polyethylene±0.015±0.005±0.005±0.015
PTFE (Teflon)
Duocel aluminum foam, 8% density[17]
Extruded polystrene (XPS) foam, medium density (Foamular 400)[18] [19]
Extruded polystrene (XPS) foam, high density (Foamular 1000)[20] [21]
HDPE[22]
Duocel copper foam, 8% density[23]
Polypropylene[24] ±0.3±0.33±0.37±0.41
Polyethylene terephthalate±0.35±0.0425±0.3±0.23±0.225
Nylon±1.0±0.9±0.75±0.65
Polystyrene±0.25±0.2±0.25±0.2
Biaxially-oriented Polypropylene±1.0±1.11±1.23±1.37
Medium-density fibreboard[25]
Titanium foam, low density[26]
Titanium foam, high density[27]
Foam glass[28]
Copper (Cu)
Brass and bronze±12.5±0.165±2.0±0.25±0.03
Zinc (Zn)
Oak wood (along grain)±0.17[29] ±3.5±9.5±20.0
Concrete (under compression)±10±4±1.75±0.7
Glass-reinforced plastic[30] [31] [32] ±14.45±8±4.35±2.5
Pine wood±0.155±6±26±89
Balsa, low density (4.4 lb/ft3)[33]
Tungsten (W)
Sitka spruce green[34] [35] [36] ±0.7±2±5±13
Osmium (Os)
Balsa, medium density (10 lb/ft3)[37]
Steel±0.15±0.5±0.1±0.02
Titanium alloys±7.5±2±0.35±0.08
Balsa, high density (16 lb/ft3)[38]
Wrought iron±10±0.2±2±0.35±0.055
Magnesium metal (Mg)
Sitka spruce dry±0.8±2±5±12
Macor machineable glass-ceramic[39]
Cordierite[40]
Glass±20±0.2[41] ±10±4.8±2.1
Tooth enamel (largely calcium phosphate)[42]
E-Glass fiber[43] [44]
Molybdenum (Mo)
Basalt fiber
Zirconia[45]
Tungsten carbide (WC)±100±6.5±0.4±0.025
S-Glass fiber[46]
Flax fiber[47] [48] [49] [50] ±34±0.15±29.35±25±21
single-crystal Yttrium iron garnet (YIG)[51]
Kevlar 29[52] (tensile only[53])
Steatite L-5[54]
Mullite[55]
Dyneema SK25 Ultra-high-molecular-weight polyethylene (tensile only)[56]
Beryllium, 30% porosity[57]
Kevlar 49 (tensile only)
Silicon[58]
Alumina fiber (Al2O3)[59] [60] ±0.315±7±4±1.74
Syalon 501 Silicon nitride[61]
Sapphire[62]
Alumina[63]
Carbon fiber reinforced plastic (70:30 fibre:matrix, unidirectional, along grain)[64]
Dyneema SK78/Honeywell Spectra 2000 UHMWPE (tensile only)[65] ±11±11±12±12
Silicon carbide (SiC)
Beryllium (Be)
Boron fiber[66]
Boron nitride[67]
Diamond (C)
Dupont E130 carbon fiber[68]
Approximate specific stiffness for various species of wood[69]
MaterialYoung's modulus (GPa)Density (g/cm3)Young's modulus per density; specific stiffness (106 m2s−2)Young's modulus per density squared (103 m5kg−1s−2)Young's modulus per density cubed (m8kg−2s−2)
Applewood or wild apple (Pyrus malus)
Ash, black (Fraxinus nigra)
Ash, blue (quadrangulata)
Ash, green (Fraxinus pennsylvanica lanceolata)
Ash, white (Fraxinus americana)
Aspen (Populus tremuloides)
Aspen, large tooth (Populus grandidentata)
Basswood (Tilia glabra or Tilia americanus)
Beech (Fagus grandifolia or Fagus americana)
Beech, blue (Carpinus caroliniana)
Birch, gray (Betula populifolia)
Birch, paper (Betula papyrifera)
Birch, sweet (Betula lenta)
Buckeye, yellow (Aesculus octandra)
Butternut (Juglans cinerea)
Cedar, eastern red (Juniperus virginiana)
Cedar, northern white (Thuja occidentalis)
Cedar, southern white (Chamaecyparis thvoides)
Cedar, western red (Thuja plicata)
Cherry, black (Prunus serotina)
Cherry, wild red (Prunus pennsylvanica)
Chestnut (Castanea dentata)
Cottonwood, eastern (Populus deltoides)
Cypress, southern (Taxodium distichum)
Dogwood (flowering) (Cornus Florida)
Douglas fir (coast type) (Pseudotsuga taxifolia)
Douglas fir (mountain type) (Pseudotsuga taxifolia)
Ebony, Andaman marble-wood (India) (Diospyros kursii)
Ebony, Ebè marbre (Mauritius, E. Africa) (Diospyros melanida)
Elm, American (Ulmus americana)
Elm, rock (Ulmus racemosa or Ulmus thomasi)
Elm, slippery (Ulmus fulva or pubescens)
Eucalyptus, Karri (W. Australia) (Eucalyptus diversicolor)
Eucalyptus, Mahogany (New South Wales) (Eucalyptus hemilampra)
Eucalyptus, West Australian mahogany (Eucalyptus marginata)
Fir, balsam (Abies balsamea)
Fir, silver (Abies amabilis)
Gum, black (Nyssa sylvatica)
Gum, blue (Eucalyptus globulus)
Gum, red (Liquidambar styraciflua)
Gum, tupelo (Nyssa aquatica)
Hemlock eastern (Tsuga canadensis)
Hemlock, mountain (Tsuga martensiana)
Hemlock, western (Tsuga heterophylla)
Hickory, bigleaf shagbark (Hicoria laciniosa)
Hickory, mockernut (Hicoria alba)
Hickory, pignut (Hicoria glabra)
Hickory, shagbark (Hicoria ovata)
Hornbeam (Ostrya virginiana)
Ironwood, black (Rhamnidium ferreum)±1.64±2.78±3.56
Larch, western (Larix occidentalis)
Locust, black or yellow (Robinia pseudacacia)
Locust honey (Gleditsia triacanthos)
Magnolia, cucumber (Magnolia acuminata)
Mahogany (W. Africa) (Khaya ivorensis)
Mahogany (E. India) (Swietenia macrophylla)
Mahogany (E. India) (Swietenia mahogani)
Maple, black (Acer nigrum)
Maple, red (Acer rubrum)
Maple, silver (Acer saccharinum)
Maple, sugar (Acer saccharum)
Oak, black (Quercus velutina)
Oak, bur (Quercus macrocarpa)
Oak, canyon live (Quercus chrysolepis)
Oak, laurel (Quercus Montana)
Oak, live (Quercus virginiana)
Oak, post (Quercus stellata or Quercus minor)
Oak, red (Quercus borealis)
Oak, swamp chestnut (Quercus Montana (Quercus prinus))
Oak swamp white (Quercus bicolor or Quercus platanoides)
Oak, white (Quercus alba)
Paulownia (P. tomentosa)
Persimmon (Diospyros virginiana)
Pine, eastern white (Pinus strobus)
Pine, jack (Pinus banksiana or Pinus divericata)
Pine, loblolly (Pinus taeda)
Pine, longleaf (Pinus palustris)
Pine, pitch (Pinus rigida)
Pine, red (Pinus resinosa)
Pine, shortleaf (Pinus echinata)
Poplar, balsam (Populus balsamifera or Populus candicans)
Poplar, yellow (Liriodendron tulipifera)
Redwood (Sequoia sempervirens)
Sassafras (Sassafras uariafolium)
Satinwood (Ceylon) (Chloroxylon swietenia)
Sourwood (Oxydendrum arboreum)
Spruce, black (Picea mariana)
Spruce, red (Picea rubra or Picea rubens)
Spruce, white (Picea glauca)
Sycamore (Platanus occidentalis)
Tamarack (Larix laricina or Larix americana)
Teak (India) (Tectona grandis)
Walnut, black (Juglans nigra)
Willow, black (Salix nigra)
Specific stiffness of the elements[70] [71]
MaterialYoung's modulus (GPa)Density (g/cm3)Young's modulus per density; specific stiffness (106 m2s−2)Young's modulus per density squared (103 m5kg−1s−2)Young's modulus per density cubed (m8kg−2s−2)
Thallium
Cesium
Arsenic
Lead
Indium
Rubidium
Selenium
Bismuth
Europium
Ytterbium
Barium
Gold
Plutonium
Cerium
Praseodymium
Cadmium
Neodymium
Hafnium
Lanthanum
Promethium
Thorium
Samarium
Lutetium
Terbium
Tin
Tellurium
Gadolinium
Dysprosium
Holmium
Erbium
Platinum
Thulium
Silver
Antimony
Lithium
Palladium
Zirconium
Sodium
Uranium
Tantalum
Niobium
Calcium
Yttrium
Copper
Zinc
Silicon
Vanadium
Tungsten
Rhenium
Rhodium
Nickel
Iridium
Cobalt
Scandium
Titanium
Magnesium
Aluminum
Manganese
Iron
Molybdenum
Ruthenium
Chromium
Beryllium

See also

References

  1. Web site: Archived copy . 2010-11-22 . https://web.archive.org/web/20110627003741/http://nptel.iitm.ac.in/courses/IIT-MADRAS/Design_Steel_Structures_II/5_cold_form_steel/3_local_buckling.pdf . 2011-06-27 . dead .
  2. Web site: Flange Local Buckling . 2010-11-22 . https://web.archive.org/web/20100527070319/http://www.bgstructuralengineering.com/BGSCM/BGSCM008/Flexure/BGSCM0080205.htm . 2010-05-27 . dead .
  3. Book: Local buckling and crippling of composite stiffener sections. David L.. Bonanni. Eric R.. Johnson. James H.. Starnes. 31 July 1988. College of Engineering, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University. National Library of Australia (new catalog). Nasa-Tm.
  4. Web site: A Density — Compression Modulus Relationship For Latex Foam.
  5. Web site: 2013-08-16 . Toylike blocks make lightweight, strong structures . 2024-03-21 . en-US.
  6. Schaedler . Tobias A. . Jacobsen . Alan J. . Carter . Wiliam B. . 2013-09-13 . Toward Lighter, Stiffer Materials . Science . en . 341 . 6151 . 1181–1182 . 10.1126/science.1243996 . 24031005 . 2013Sci...341.1181S . 0036-8075.
  7. Web site: Coldewey . Devin . 2024-01-17 . NASA's robotic, self-assembling structures could be the next phase of space construction . 2024-03-21 . TechCrunch . en-US.
  8. Web site: 2024-01-17 . Robot Team Builds High-Performance Digital Structure for NASA - NASA . 2024-03-21 . en-US.
  9. Web site: A Density — Compression Modulus Relationship For Latex Foam.
  10. Web site: A Density — Compression Modulus Relationship For Latex Foam.
  11. Web site: A Density — Compression Modulus Relationship For Latex Foam.
  12. Alaoui. Adil Hafidi. Woignier. Thierry. Scherer. George W.. Phalippou. Jean. Comparison between flexural and uniaxial compression tests to measure the elastic modulus of silica aerogel. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 354. 40–41. 2008. 4556–4561. 0022-3093. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.06.014. 2008JNCS..354.4556A.
  13. Web site: Densities of Solids. www.engineeringtoolbox.com.
  14. Web site: Polystyrene Foam (EPS) Physical Data Sheet.
  15. Alaoui. Adil Hafidi. Woignier. Thierry. Scherer. George W.. Phalippou. Jean. Comparison between flexural and uniaxial compression tests to measure the elastic modulus of silica aerogel. Journal of Non-Crystalline Solids. 354. 40–41. 2008. 4556–4561. 0022-3093. 10.1016/j.jnoncrysol.2008.06.014. 2008JNCS..354.4556A.
  16. Web site: Polystyrene Foam (EPS) Physical Data Sheet.
  17. Web site: Physical Characteristics of Duocel® Aluminum Foam* (8% Nominal Density 6101-T6).
  18. Web site: FOAMULAR® Extruded Polystyrene (XPS) Insulation SI and I-P Units for Selected Properties - Technical Bulletin.
  19. Web site: High Density Extruded Polystyrene Rigid Insulation.
  20. Web site: FOAMULAR® Extruded Polystyrene (XPS) Insulation SI and I-P Units for Selected Properties - Technical Bulletin.
  21. Web site: High Density Extruded Polystyrene Rigid Insulation.
  22. Web site: Archived copy . dynalabcorp.com . 15 January 2022 . https://web.archive.org/web/20031118100625/http://dynalabcorp.com/technical_info_hd_polyethylene.asp . 18 November 2003 . dead.
  23. Web site: Physical Characteristics of Duocel® Copper Foam* (8% Nominal Density C10100).
  24. Web site: Polypropylene - online catalogue source - supplier of research materials in small quantities - Goodfellow. www.goodfellow.com. www.goodfellow.com.
  25. Web site: Material Properties Data: Medium Density Fiberboard (MDF) . 2010-11-11 . https://web.archive.org/web/20110519140920/http://www.makeitfrom.com/data/?material=MDF . 2011-05-19 . dead .
  26. Dunand. D. C.. Processing of Titanium Foams. Advanced Engineering Materials. 6. 6. 2004. 369–376. 1438-1656. 10.1002/adem.200405576. 15118192 .
  27. Dunand. D. C.. Processing of Titanium Foams. Advanced Engineering Materials. 6. 6. 2004. 369–376. 1438-1656. 10.1002/adem.200405576. 15118192 .
  28. Web site: PHYSICAL AND THERMAL PROPERTIES OF FOAMGLAS® ONE™ INSULATION.
  29. Web site: Mass, Weight, Density or Specific Gravity of Wood. www.simetric.co.uk.
  30. Web site: Polyester Matrix Composite reinforced by glass fibers (Fiberglass) [SubsTech]]. www.substech.com.
  31. Web site: MatWeb - The Online Materials Information Resource. www.matweb.com.
  32. Web site: V-Rod fiberglass rebar - Retaining walls. VROD.
  33. Sabate . Borrega . Gibson . Lorna J. . May 2015 . Mechanics of balsa (Ochroma pyramidale) wood . Mechanics of Materials . 84 . 75–90 . 10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.01.014 . 2015MechM..84...75B . 1721.1/108580 . 54736632 . 2019-08-09 . free .
  34. Web site: Touchwood BV - Sitka Spruce. www.sitkaspruce.nl.
  35. http://www.allbusiness.com/education-training/academic-standards-testing-academic/11677688-1.html
  36. Web site: Sitka Spruce . 2010-11-11 . https://web.archive.org/web/20110716073337/https://fp.auburn.edu/sfws/sfnmc/class/ss.html . 2011-07-16 . dead .
  37. Sabate . Borrega . Gibson . Lorna J. . May 2015 . Mechanics of balsa (Ochroma pyramidale) wood . Mechanics of Materials . 84 . 75–90 . 10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.01.014 . 2015MechM..84...75B . 1721.1/108580 . 54736632 . 2019-08-09 . free .
  38. Sabate . Borrega . Gibson . Lorna J. . May 2015 . Mechanics of balsa (Ochroma pyramidale) wood . Mechanics of Materials . 84 . 75–90 . 10.1016/j.mechmat.2015.01.014 . 2015MechM..84...75B . 1721.1/108580 . 54736632 . 2019-08-09 . free .
  39. Web site: Archived copy . 2015-04-13 . https://web.archive.org/web/20150413161426/http://www.corning.com/assets/0/965/3557/3577/3615/71759a443535431395eb34ebead091cb.pdf . 2015-04-13 . dead .
  40. Web site: Ceramic Industry 2013 Material Properties Chart. 2019-08-12. https://web.archive.org/web/20160222023911/http://www.ceramicindustry.com/ext/resources/pdfs/2013-CCD-Material-Charts.pdf. 2016-02-22. dead.
  41. Web site: Density of glass. Shaye. Storm. 2004. The Physics Factbook. Elert. Glenn. 2022-01-24.
  42. J. A.. Weatherell. 1 May 1975. British Medical Bulletin. 31. 2. 115–119. 10.1093/oxfordjournals.bmb.a071263. 1164600. Composition of Dental Enamel.
  43. Web site: Reinforcement types . 2010-11-11 . https://web.archive.org/web/20101220143522/http://www.rapra.net/composites/material-selection/reinforcement-types.asp . 2010-12-20 . dead .
  44. Web site: E-Glass Fibre. 30 August 2001. AZoM.com.
  45. Web site: Ceramic Industry 2013 Material Properties Chart. 2019-08-12. https://web.archive.org/web/20160222023911/http://www.ceramicindustry.com/ext/resources/pdfs/2013-CCD-Material-Charts.pdf. 2016-02-22. dead.
  46. Web site: S-Glass Fibre. 30 August 2001. AZoM.com.
  47. Web site: Metapress - A Fast Growing Resource for Young Entrepreneurs. 14 December 2017. 11 November 2010. https://web.archive.org/web/20120312053152/http://resources.metapress.com/pdf-preview.axd?code=t068n73845p4185r&size=largest. 12 March 2012. dead.
  48. http://www.wolframalpha.com/entities/common_materials/flax_fiber/x5/z7/3v/
  49. Web site: Microsoft PowerPoint - Ulven Natural Fiber Presentation.ppt . 2018-08-01.
  50. Web site: Archived copy . 2010-11-11 . https://web.archive.org/web/20110707093937/http://www.agrofibrecomposites.com/thesisBos.pdf . 2011-07-07 . dead .
  51. Web site: YIG properties . 2010-11-11 . https://web.archive.org/web/20090225155636/http://www.isowave.com/pdf/materials/Yttrium_Iron_Garnet.pdf . 2009-02-25 . dead .
  52. Web site: Kevlar® Properties - Kevlar® Technical Guide - DuPont USA. admin. www2.dupont.com.
  53. 10.1007/BF00550757 . 1980JMatS..15.2523P . 15 . 10 . Compression strength of carbon, glass and Kevlar-49 fibre reinforced polyester resins . 1980 . Journal of Materials Science . 2523–2538 . Piggott . M. R. . Harris . B.. 133594285 .
  54. Web site: Ceramic Industry 2013 Material Properties Chart. 2019-08-12. https://web.archive.org/web/20160222023911/http://www.ceramicindustry.com/ext/resources/pdfs/2013-CCD-Material-Charts.pdf. 2016-02-22. dead.
  55. Web site: Ceramic Industry 2013 Material Properties Chart. 2019-08-12. https://web.archive.org/web/20160222023911/http://www.ceramicindustry.com/ext/resources/pdfs/2013-CCD-Material-Charts.pdf. 2016-02-22. dead.
  56. Web site: Home - Dyneema®. www.dyneema.com.
  57. Billone. M.C. Donne. M.Dalle. Macaulay-Newcombe. R.G. Status of beryllium development for fusion applications. Fusion Engineering and Design. 27. 1995. 179–190. 0920-3796. 10.1016/0920-3796(95)90125-6. 1995FusED..27..179B .
  58. Web site: Physical properties of Silicon (Si). www.ioffe.ru.
  59. Web site: Alumina (Al2O3) - Physical and Mechanical Properties of Aluminium Oxide Ceramics by Superior Technical Ceramics . www.azom.com . 3 February 2022 . https://archive.today/20120721025408/http://www.azom.com/Details.asp?ArticleID=5464 . 21 July 2012 . dead.
  60. Web site: saffil. www.saffil.com.
  61. Web site: Physical property data for Syalon 501. 18 October 2017 .
  62. Web site: Ceramic Industry 2013 Material Properties Chart. 2019-08-12. https://web.archive.org/web/20160222023911/http://www.ceramicindustry.com/ext/resources/pdfs/2013-CCD-Material-Charts.pdf. 2016-02-22. dead.
  63. Web site: Ceramic Industry 2013 Material Properties Chart. 2019-08-12. https://web.archive.org/web/20160222023911/http://www.ceramicindustry.com/ext/resources/pdfs/2013-CCD-Material-Charts.pdf. 2016-02-22. dead.
  64. Web site: Epoxy Matrix Composite reinforced by 70% carbon fibers [SubsTech]]. www.substech.com.
  65. Web site: Product info . 2000 . www51.honeywell.com .
  66. Web site: Boron Fiber Properties. www.specmaterials.com.
  67. Web site: Ceramic Industry 2013 Material Properties Chart. 2019-08-12. https://web.archive.org/web/20160222023911/http://www.ceramicindustry.com/ext/resources/pdfs/2013-CCD-Material-Charts.pdf. 2016-02-22. dead.
  68. 10.1007/BF01184586 . 30 . 9 . Mechanical and physical properties of post-creep, pitch-based carbon filaments . 1995 . Journal of Materials Science . 2352–2357 . Lavin . J. Gerard . Kogure . Kei . Sines . G.. 1995JMatS..30.2352L . 137212713 .
  69. Web site: Physical Properties of Common Woods . 2010-11-22 . https://web.archive.org/web/20100609005909/http://www.csudh.edu/oliver/chemdata/woods.htm . 2010-06-09 . dead .
  70. Web site: Young Modulus of the elements.
  71. Web site: Density of the elements.