Solid partition explained

In mathematics, solid partitions are natural generalizations of integer partitions and plane partitions defined by Percy Alexander MacMahon.^[1] A solid partition of

n is a three-dimensional array of non-negative integers n _{i,j,k} (with indices i, j, k\geq 1 ) such that \sum _{i,j,k} n _{i,j,k} = n andn _{i+1,j,k} \leq n _{i,j,k} , n _{i,j+1,k} \leq n _{i,j,k} and n _{i,j,k+1} \leq n _{i,j,k} for all i, j and k. Let p _{3(n)} denote the number of solid partitions of n . As the definition of solid partitions involves three-dimensional arrays of numbers, they are also called three-dimensional partitions in notation where plane partitions are two-dimensional partitions and partitions are one-dimensional partitions. Solid partitions and their higher-dimensional generalizations are discussed in the book by Andrews.^[2]

Ferrers diagrams for solid partitions

Another representation for solid partitions is in the form of Ferrers diagrams. The Ferrers diagram of a solid partition of

n is a collection of n points or nodes, λ= ( y _{1,y} _{2,\ldots,y} _{n)} , with y _{i\in} Z ^{4} _{\geq 0} satisfying the condition:^[3]

Condition FD: If the node

a = (a _{1,a} _{2,a} _{3,} a _{4)\in} λ , then so do all the nodes y = (y _{1,y} _{2,y} _{3,y} _{4)} with 0 \leq y _{i\leq} a _{i} for all i =1 , 2 , 3 , 4 .

For instance, the Ferrers diagram

\left( \begin{smallmatrix} 0 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \end{smallmatrix} \begin{smallmatrix} 0 \ 0 \ 1 \ 0 \end{smallmatrix} \begin{smallmatrix} 0 \ 1 \ 0 \ 0 \end{smallmatrix} \begin{smallmatrix} 1 \ 0 \ 0 \ 0 \end{smallmatrix} \begin{smallmatrix} 1 \ 1 \ 0 \ 0 \end{smallmatrix} \right) , where each column is a node, represents a solid partition of 5 . There is a natural action of the permutation group S _{4} on a Ferrers diagram – this corresponds to permuting the four coordinates of all nodes. This generalises the operation denoted by conjugation on usual partitions.

Equivalence of the two representations

Given a Ferrers diagram, one constructs the solid partition (as in the main definition) as follows.

Let

n _{i,j,k} be the number of nodes in the Ferrers diagram with coordinates of the form (i -1 ,j -1 ,k -1 ,*) where * denotes an arbitrary value. The collection n _{i,j,k} form a solid partition. One can verify that condition FD implies that the conditions for a solid partition are satisfied.

Given a set of

n _{i,j,k} that form a solid partition, one obtains the corresponding Ferrers diagram as follows.

Start with the Ferrers diagram with no nodes. For every non-zero

n _{i,j,k} , add n _{i,j,k} nodes (i -1 ,j -1 ,k -1 ,y _{4)} for 0 \leq y _{4<} n _{i,j,k} to the Ferrers diagram. By construction, it is easy to see that condition FD is satisfied.

For example, the Ferrers diagram with

5 nodes given above corresponds to the solid partition with n _{1,1,1} = n _{2,1,1} = n _{1,2,1} = n _{1,1,2} = n _{2,2,1} =1 with all other n _{i,j,k} vanishing.

Generating function

Let

p _{3(0)\equiv} 1 . Define the generating function of solid partitions, P _{3(q)} , byP _{3(q)} : = \sum ^{inf ty} _{n =0} p _{3(n)} q ^{n} = 1 + q + 4 q ^{2} + 10 q ^{3} + 26 q ^{4} + 59 q ^{5} + 140 q ^{6} + … . The generating functions of integer partitions and plane partitions have simple product formulae, due to Euler and MacMahon, respectively. However, a guess of MacMahon fails to correctly reproduce the solid partitions of 6. It appears that there is no simple formula for the generating function of solid partitions; in particular, there cannot be any formula analogous to the product formulas of Euler and MacMahon.^[4]

Exact enumeration using computers

Given the lack of an explicitly known generating function, the enumerations of the numbers of solid partitions for larger integers have been carried out numerically. There are two algorithms that are used to enumerate solid partitions and their higher-dimensional generalizations. The work of Atkin. et al. used an algorithm due to Bratley and McKay.^[5] In 1970, Knuth proposed a different algorithm to enumerate topological sequences that he used to evaluate numbers of solid partitions of all integers

n\leq 28 .^[6] Mustonen and Rajesh extended the enumeration for all integers n\leq 50 .^[7] In 2010, S. Balakrishnan proposed a parallel version of Knuth's algorithm that has been used to extend the enumeration to all integers n\leq 72 .^[8] One finds p _{3(72)=3464} 27497 40651 72792 , which is a 19 digit number illustrating the difficulty in carrying out such exact enumerations.

Asymptotic behavior

It is conjectured that there exists a constant

c such that^{[9] [10]}

$$\backslash lim\_\; \backslash frac\; =\; c.$$

External links

• • The Solid Partitions Project of IIT Madras
• The Mathworld entry for Solid Partitions

Notes and References

1. P. A. MacMahon, Combinatory Analysis. Cambridge Univ. Press, London and New York, Vol. 1, 1915 and Vol. 2, 1916; see vol. 2, p 332.
2. G. E. Andrews, The theory of partitions, Cambridge University Press, 1998.
3. A. O. L. Atkin, P. Bratley, I. G. McDonald and J. K. S. McKay, Some computations for m-dimensional partitions, Proc. Camb. Phil. Soc., 63 (1967), 1097–1100.
4. Book: Stanley, Richard P.. Richard P. Stanley. Enumerative Combinatorics, volume 2. Cambridge University Press. 1999. 402.
5. P. Bratley and J. K. S. McKay, "Algorithm 313: Multi-dimensional partition generator", Comm. ACM, 10 (Issue 10, 1967), p. 666.
6. D. E. Knuth, "A note on solid partitions", Math. Comp., 24 (1970), 955–961.
7. Ville Mustonen and R. Rajesh, "Numerical Estimation of the Asymptotic Behaviour of Solid Partitions of an Integer", J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 36 (2003), no. 24, 6651.cond-mat/0303607
8. Srivatsan Balakrishnan, Suresh Govindarajan and Naveen S. Prabhakar, "On the asymptotics of higher-dimensional partitions", J.Phys. A: Math. Gen. 45 (2012) 055001 arXiv:1105.6231.
9. Destainville, N., & Govindarajan, S. (2015). Estimating the asymptotics of solid partitions. Journal of Statistical Physics, 158, 950-967
10. D P Bhatia, M A Prasad and D Arora, "Asymptotic results for the number of multidimensional partitions of an integer and directed compact lattice animals", J. Phys. A: Math. Gen. 30 (1997) 2281