Social Democratic Federation election results explained
This article lists the Social Democratic Federation's election results in UK parliamentary elections. It also includes the results of its successor, the British Socialist Party.
Summary of general election performance
Year | Number of Candidates | Total votes | Average voters per candidate | Percentage of vote | Saved deposits | Change (%) | Number of MPs |
---|
1885 | 3 | 657 | 219 | 0.0 | N/A | N/A | 0 |
---|
1886 | 0 | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A | 0 |
---|
1892 | 2 | 659 | 330 | 0.0 | N/A | N/A | 0 |
---|
1895 | 4 | 3,730 | 933 | 0.1 | N/A | +0.1 | 0 |
---|
1900 | 2 | 6,997 | 3,499 | 0.2 | N/A | +0.1 | 0 |
---|
1906 | 8 | 18,446 | 2,310 | 0.4 | N/A | +0.2 | 0 |
---|
Jan 1910 | 9 | 13,479 | 1,498 | 0.2 | N/A | -0.2 | 0 |
---|
Dec 1910 | 2 | 5,733 | 2,867 | 0.1 | N/A | -0.1 | 0 |
---|
1918 | 16 | 71,762 | 4,485 | 0.7 | 13 | +0.6 | 0 | |
---|
Elections results
1885 general election
Constituency | Candidate | Votes | % | Position |
---|
| | 27 | 0.6 | 3 |
| | 32 | 0.5 | 3 |
| | 598 | 5.4 | 3 | |
1892 general election
Constituency | Candidate | Votes | % | Position |
---|
| | 106 | 2.0 | 3 |
| | 553 | 7.5 | 3 | |
1895 general election
Constituency | Candidate | Votes | % | Position |
---|
| | 1,498 | 12.4 | 3 |
| | 1,216 | 6.7 | 5 |
| | 813 | 10.8 | 3 |
| | 203 | 3.8 | 3 | |
By-elections, 1895–1900
By-election | Candidate | Votes | % | Position |
---|
| | 274 | 2.4 | |
| | 270 | 3.1 | | |
1900 general election
Constituency | Candidate | Votes | % | Position |
---|
| | 2,558 | 36.7 | 2 |
| | 4,439 | 44.2 | 2 | |
For the 1900 general election, the Social Democratic Federation stood candidates as part of the Labour Representation Committee.
1906 general election
Constituency | Candidate | Votes | % | Position |
---|
| | 1,935 | 25.1 | 2 |
| | 4,852 | 38.3 | 2 |
| | 3,090 | 22.8 | 3 |
| | 4,932 | 32.5 | 3 |
| | 109 | 1.5 | 3 |
| | 2,366 | 10.9 | 6 |
| | 2,544 | 11.7 | 5 |
| | 2,146 | 8.0 | 5 | |
By-elections, 1906–1910
By-election | Candidate | Votes | % | Position |
---|
| | 276 | 2.6 | 3 |
| | 986 | 17.7 | 3 |
| | 2,971 | 10.4 | 3 | |
January 1910 general election
Constituency | Candidate | Votes | % | Position |
---|
| | 1,344 | 16.9 | 3 |
| | 1,740 | 12.0 | 3 |
| | 4,948 | 30.2 | 3 |
| | 777 | 11.3 | 3 |
| | 701 | 11.1 | 3 |
| | 1,792 | 7.7 | 5 |
| | 1,617 | 7.0 | 6 |
| | 1,755 | 12.6 | 3 |
| | 510 | 4.7 | 3 | |
December 1910 general election
Constituency | Candidate | Votes | % | Position |
---|
| | 3,810 | 23.8 | 3 |
| | 1,901 | 14.5 | 3 | |
By-elections, 1910–1918
By-election | Candidate | Votes | % | Position |
---|
| | 2,580 | 11.4 | 3 |
| | 1,063 | 10.4 | 3 |
| | 893 | 11.6 | 3 | |
The Social Democratic Party merged into the British Socialist Party in 1911. Hartley was endorsed by the Labour Party.
1918 general election
Constituency | Candidate | Votes | % | Position |
---|
| | 8,291 | 30.9 | 2 |
| | 3,575 | 25.7 | 2 |
| | 7,436 | 34.3 | 2 |
| | 3,751 | 19.4 | 2 |
| | 1,845 | 12.8 | 3 |
| | 2,542 | 11.2 | 3 |
| | 9,015 | 33.7 | 2 |
| | 3,556 | 24.1 | 2 |
| | 4,000 | 19.3 | 2 |
| | 4,135 | 23.2 | 3 |
| | 4,004 | 19.1 | 3 |
| | 3,807 | 19.0 | 2 |
| | 643 | 4.0 | 3 |
| | 3,167 | 20.4 | 2 |
| | 7,828 | 10.6 | 4 |
| | 4,167 | 29.3 | 2 | |
All candidates other than Arnall, Hirst and Murray stood for the Labour Party. Hirst stood for the Co-operative Party.
References
- Martin Crick, The History of the Social Democratic Federation, pp.330-332