| SMART-1 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mission Type: | Technology Lunar orbiter | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Operator: | ESA | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Cospar Id: | 2003-043C | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Satcat: | 27949 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Website: | SMART-1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Mission Duration: | 2 years, 11 months, 6 days, 6 hours, 27 minutes, 36 seconds | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Manufacturer: | Swedish Space Corporation | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Dry Mass: | 287kg (633lb) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Launch Mass: | 367kg (809lb)[1] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Launch Date: | UTC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Launch Rocket: | Ariane 5G | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Launch Site: | Kourou ELA-3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Launch Contractor: | Arianespace | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Decay Date: | UTC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Orbit Epoch: | 18 July 2005, 11:14:28 UTC | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Orbit Reference: | Selenocentric | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Orbit Periapsis: | 2205km (1,370miles) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Orbit Apoapsis: | 4600km (2,900miles) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Orbit Inclination: | 90.26 degrees | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Orbit Eccentricity: | 0.352054 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Orbit Period: | 4.95 hours | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Apsis: | selene | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Interplanetary: |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Instruments List: |
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Insignia: | File:SMART-1 insignia.png | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Insignia Caption: | Legacy ESA insignia for the SMART-1 mission | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Insignia Alt: | ISO legacy mission insignia | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Insignia Size: | 180x180px | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SMART-1 was a Swedish-designed European Space Agency satellite that orbited the Moon. It was launched on 27 September 2003 at 23:14 UTC from the Guiana Space Centre in Kourou, French Guiana. "SMART-1" stands for Small Missions for Advanced Research in Technology-1. On 3 September 2006 (05:42 UTC), SMART-1 was deliberately crashed into the Moon's surface, ending its mission.[3]
SMART-1 was about one meter across (3.3 ft), and lightweight in comparison to other probes. Its launch mass was 367 kg or 809 pounds, of which 287 kg (633 lb) was non-propellant.
It was propelled by a solar-powered Hall effect thruster (Snecma PPS-1350-G) using 82 Kg of xenon gas contained in a 50 litres tank at a pressure of 150 bar at launch. The ion engine thruster used an electrostatic field to ionize the xenon and accelerate the ions achieving a specific impulse of 16.1 kN·s/kg (1,640 seconds), more than three times the maximum for chemical rockets. One kg of propellant (1/350 to 1/300 of the total mass of the spacecraft) produced a delta-v of about 45 m/s. The electric propulsion subsystem weighted 29 kg with a peak power consumption of 1,200 watts. SMART-1 was the first in the program of ESA's Small Missions for Advanced Research and Technology.
The solar arrays made capable of 1850W at the beginning of the mission, were able to provide the maximum set of 1,190 W to the thruster, giving a nominal thrust of 68 mN, hence an acceleration of 0.2 mm/s2 or 0.7 m/s per hour (i.e., just under 0.00002 g of acceleration). As with all ion-engine powered craft, orbital maneuvers were not carried out in short bursts but very gradually. The particular trajectory taken by SMART-1 to the Moon required thrusting for about one third to one half of every orbit. When spiraling away from the Earth thrusting was done on the perigee part of the orbit. At the end of the mission, the thruster had demonstrated the following capability:
As part of the European Space Agency's strategy to build very inexpensive and relatively small spaceships, the total cost of SMART-1 was a relatively small 110 million euros (about 170 million U.S. dollars). SMART-1 was designed and developed by the Swedish Space Corporation on behalf of ESA. Assembly of the spacecraft was carried out by Saab Space in Linköping. Tests of the spacecraft were directed by Swedish Space Corporation and executed by Saab Space. The project manager at ESA was Giuseppe Racca until the spacecraft achieved the moon operational orbit. He was then replaced by Gerhard Schwehm for the Science phase. The project manager at the Swedish Space Corporation was Peter Rathsman. The Principal Project Scientist was Bernard Foing. The Ground Segment Manager during the preparation phase was Mike McKay and the Spacecraft Operations manager was Octavio Camino.
The Advanced Moon micro-Imager Experiment was a miniature colour camera for lunar imaging. The CCD camera with three filters of 750, 900 and 950 nm was able to take images with an average pixel resolution of 80 m (about 260 ft). The camera weighed 2.1 kg (about 4.5 lb) and had a power consumption of 9 watts.[4]
The Demonstration of a Compact X-ray Spectrometer was an X-ray telescope for the identification of chemical elements on the lunar surface. It detected the x-ray fluorescence (XRF) of crystal compounds created through the interaction of the electron shell with the solar wind particles to measure the abundance of the three main components: magnesium, silicon and aluminium. The detection of iron, calcium and titanium depended on the solar activity. The detection range for x-rays was 0.5 to 10 keV. The spectrometer and XSM (described below) together weighed 5.2 kg and had a power consumption of 18 watts.
The X-ray solar monitor studied the solar variability to complement D-CIXS measurements.
The Smart-1 Infrared Spectrometer was an infrared spectrometer for the identification of mineral spectra of olivine and pyroxene. It detected wavelengths from 0.93 to 2.4 μm with 256 channels. The package weighed 2.3 kg and had a power consumption of 4.1 watts.[5]
The Electric Propulsion Diagnostic Package was to acquire data on the new propulsion system on SMART-1. The package weighed 0.8 kg and had a power consumption of 1.8 watts.[6]
The Spacecraft Potential, Electron and Dust Experiment. The experiment weighed 0.8 kg and had a power consumption of 1.8 watts. Its function was to measure the properties and density of the plasma around the spacecraft, either as a Langmuir probe or as an electric field probe. SPEDE observed the emission of the spacecraft's ion engine and the "wake" the Moon leaves to the solar wind. Unlike most other instruments that have to be shut down to prevent damage, SPEDE could keep measuring inside radiation belts and in solar storms, such as the Halloween 2003 solar storms.[7] [8] It was built by Finnish Meteorological Institute and its name was intentionally chosen so that its acronym is the same as the nickname of Spede Pasanen, a famous Finnish movie actor, movie producer, and inventor. The algorithms developed for SPEDE were later used in the ESA lander Philae.
Ka band TT&C (telemetry, tracking and control) Experiment. The experiment weighed 6.2 kg and had a power consumption of 26 watts. The Ka-band transponder was designed as precursor for BepiColombo to perform radio science investigations and to monitor the dynamical performance of the electric propulsion system.
SMART-1 was launched 27 September 2003 together with Insat 3E and eBird 1, by an Ariane 5 rocket from the Guiana Space Centre in French Guiana. After 42 minutes it was released into a geostationary transfer orbit of 7,035 × 42,223 km. From there it used its Solar Electric Primary Propulsion (SEPP) to gradually spiral out during thirteen months.
The orbit can be seen up to 26 October 2004 at spaceref.com, when the orbit was 179,718 × 305,214 km. On that date, after the 289th engine pulse, the SEPP had accumulated a total on-time of nearly 3,648 hours out of a total flight time of 8,000 hours, hence a little less than half of its total mission. It consumed about 58.8 kg of xenon and produced a delta-v of 2,737 m/s (46.5 m/s per kg xenon, 0.75 m/s per hour on-time). It was powered on again on 15 November for a planned burn of 4.5 days to enter fully into lunar orbit. It took until February 2005 using the electric thruster to decelerate into the final orbit 300–3,000 km above the Moon's surface.[9] The end of mission performance demonstrated by the propulsion system is stated above.
| Epoch (UTC) | Perigee (km) | Apogee (km) | Eccentricity | Inclination (deg) (to Earth equator) | Period (h) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 27 September 2003 | ~7,035 | ~42,223 | ~0.714 | ~6.9 | ~10.6833 | |
| 26 October 2003, 21:20:00.0 | 8,687.994 | 44,178.401 | 0.671323 | 6.914596 | 11.880450 | |
| 19 November 2003, 04:29:48.4 | 10,843.910 | 46,582.165 | 0.622335 | 6.861354 | 13.450152 | |
| 19 December 2003, 06:41:47.6 | 13,390.351 | 49,369.049 | 0.573280 | 6.825455 | 15.366738 | |
| 29 December 2003, 05:21:47.8 | 17,235.509 | 54,102.642 | 0.516794 | 6.847919 | 18.622855 | |
| 19 February 2004, 22:46:08.6 | 20,690.564 | 65,869.222 | 0.521936 | 6.906311 | 24.890737 | |
| 19 March 2004, 00:40:52.7 | 20,683.545 | 66,915.919 | 0.527770 | 6.979793 | 25.340528 | |
| 25 August 2004, 00:00:00 | 37,791.261 | 240,824.363 | 0.728721 | 6.939815 | 143.738051 | |
| 19 October 2004, 21:30:45.9 | 69,959.278 | 292,632.424 | 0.614115 | 12.477919 | 213.397970 | |
| 24 October 2004, 06:12:40.9 | 179,717.894 | 305,214.126 | 0.258791 | 20.591807 | 330.053834 |
| Epoch (UTC) | Periselene (km) | Aposelene (km) | Eccentricity | Inclination (deg) (to Moon equator) | Period (h) | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 15 November 2004, 17:47:12.1 | 6,700.720 | 53,215.151 | 0.776329 | 81.085 | 129.247777 | |
| 4 December 2004 10:37:47.3 | 5,454.925 | 20,713.095 | 0.583085 | 83.035 | 37.304959 | |
| 9 January 2005, 15:24:55.0 | 2,751.511 | 6,941.359 | 0.432261 | 87.892 | 8.409861 | |
| 28 February 2005, 05:18:39.9 | 2,208.659 | 4,618.220 | 0.352952 | 90.063603 | 4.970998 | |
| 25 April 2005, 08:19:05.4 | 2,283.738 | 4,523.111 | 0.328988 | 90.141407 | 4.949137 | |
| 16 May 2005, 09:08:52.9 | 2,291.250 | 4,515.857 | 0.326807 | 89.734929 | 4.949919 | |
| 20 June 2005, 10:21:37.1 | 2,256.090 | 4,549.196 | 0.336960 | 90.232619 | 4.947432 | |
| 18 July 2005, 11:14:28.0 | 2,204.645 | 4,600.376 | 0.352054 | 90.263741 | 4.947143 |
SMART-1 impacted the Moon's surface, as planned, on 3 September 2006 at 05:42:22 UTC, ending its mission. Moving at approximately 2,000 m/s (4,500 mph), SMART-1 created an impact visible with ground telescopes from Earth. It is hoped that not only will this provide some data simulating a meteor impact, but also that it might expose materials in the ground, like water ice, to spectroscopic analysis.
ESA originally estimated that impact occurred at .[13] In 2017, the impact site was identified from Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter data at -34.262°N -46.193°W. At the time of impact, the Moon was visible in North and South America, and places in the Pacific Ocean, but not Europe, Africa, or western Asia.
This project has generated data and know-how that will be used for other missions, such as the ESA's BepiColombo mission to Mercury.
Smart-1 operations were conducted from the ESA European Space Operations Center ESOC in Darmstadt Germany led by the Spacecraft Operations Manager Octavio Camino.
The ground segment of Smart-1 was a good example of infrastructure reuse at ESA: Flight Dynamics infrastructure and Data distribution System (DDS) from Rosetta, Mars Express and Venus Express. The generic mission control system software SCOS 2000, and a set of generic interface elements use at ESA for the operations of their missions.
The use of CCSDS TLM and TC standards permitted a cost effective tailoring of seven different terminals of the ESA Tracking network (ESTRACK) plus Weilheim in Germany (DLR).
The components that were developed specifically for Smart-1 were: the simulator; a mix of hardware and software derived from the Electrical Ground Support Equipment EGSE equipment, the Mission Planning System and the Automation System developed from MOIS (this last based on a prototype implemented for Envisat) and a suite of engineering tools called MUST. This last permitted the Smart-1 engineers to do anomaly investigation through internet, pioneering at ESA monitoring of spacecraft TLM using mobile phones and PDAs and receiving spacecraft alarms via SMS.
The first and most critical problem came after the first revolution when a failure in the onboard Error Detection and Correction (EDAC) algorithm triggered an autonomous switch to the redundant computer in every orbit causing several reboots, finding the spacecraft in SAFE mode after every pericenter passage. The analysis of the spacecraft telemetry pointed directly to a radiation-triggered problem with the EDAC interrupt routine.
Other anomalies during this period were a combination of environmental problems: high radiation doses, especially in the star trackers and onboard software anomalies: the Reed Solomon encoding became corrupt after switching data rates and had to be disabled. It was overcome by procedures and changes on ground operations approach.The star trackers were also subject of frequent hiccups during the earth escape and caused some of the Electric Propulsion (EP) interruptions.[15] They were all resolved with several software patches.
The EP showed sensitivity to radiation inducing shutdowns. This phenomenon identified as the Opto-coupler Single Event Transient (OSET), initially seen in LEOP during the first firing using cathode B, was characterized by a rapid drop in Anode Current triggering the alarm 'Flame Out' bit causing the shutdown of the EP. The problem was identified to be radiation induced Opto-coupler sensitivity. The recovery of such events was to restart the thruster. This was manually done during several months until an On Board Software Patch (OBSW) was developed to detect it and initiate an autonomous thruster restart. Its impact was limited to the orbit prediction calculation used for the Ground Stations to track the spacecraft and the subsequent orbit corrections.
The different kind of anomalies and the frequent interruptions in the thrust of the Electric Propulsion led to an increase of the ground stations support and overtime of the flight operations team who had to react quickly. Their recovery was sometimes time consuming, especially when the spacecraft was found in SAFE mode. Overall, they impeded to run the operations as originally planned having one 8 hours pass every 4 days.The mission negotiated the use the ESTRACK network spare capacity. This concept permitted about eight times additional network coverage at no extra cost but originated unexpected overheads and conflicts. It ultimately permitted additional contacts with the spacecraft during the early stage of the mission and an important increase of science during the Moon phase. This phase required a major reconfiguration of the on-board stores and its operation. This change designed by the flight control team at ESOC and implemented by the Swedish Space Corporation in a short time required to re-write part of the Flight Control Procedures FOP for the operations at the Moon.
The Operations during the Moon phase become highly automated: the flight dynamics pointing was "menu driven" allowing more than 98% of commanding being generated by the Mission Planning System MPS. The extension of the MPS system with the so called MOIS Executor, became the Smart-1 automation system. It permitted to operate 70% of the passes unmanned towards the end of the mission and allowed the validation of the first operational "spacecraft automation system" at ESA.
The mission achieved all its objectives: getting out of the radiation belts influence 3 months after launch, spiraling out during 11 months and being captured by the Moon using resonances, the commissioning and operations of all instruments during the cruise phase and the optimization of the navigation and operational procedures required for Electric Propulsion operation.[16] The efficient operations of the Electric Propulsion at the Moon allowed the reduction of the orbital radius benefiting the scientific operations and extending this mission by one extra year.
A detailed chronology of the operations events is provided in ref.
The full mission phases from the operations perspective is documented in including the performance of the different subsystems.