Sino-Pakistan Agreement Explained

The Boundary Agreement between China and Pakistan, 1963
Date Signed:2 March 1963
Original Signatories:
  • Marshal Chen Yi, Plenipotentiary of the Government of the People's Republic of China
  • Z. Ali Bhutto, Plenipotentiary of the Government of Pakistan
Parties:
  • China
  • Pakistan
Location Signed:Peking
Languages:Chinese, English, Urdu
Citations:https://web.archive.org/web/20211025160757/https://people.unica.it/annamariabaldussi/files/2015/04/China-Pakistan-1963.pdf
Long Name:Agreement on the boundary between China's Sinkiang and the contiguous areas
Date Effective:2 March 1963
Wikisource:中华人民共和国政府和巴基斯坦政府关于中国新疆和由巴基斯坦实际控制其防务的各个地区相接壤的边界的协定

The Sino-Pakistan Agreement is a 1963 document between the governments of Pakistan and China establishing the border between those countries in the disputed Kashmir region.

It resulted in both countries ceding over 1942km2 to the other. Pakistan recognized Chinese sovereignty over land in Northern Areas of Kashmir and Ladakh.[1] [2] However, Indian writers have insisted that in this transaction, Pakistan surrendered approximately 2050order=flipNaNorder=flip of territory to China.[3] India claims the agreement is invalid, and claims sovereignty over part of the land. In addition to increasing tensions with India, the agreement shifted the balance of the Cold War by bringing Pakistan and China closer together while loosening ties between Pakistan and the United States.

Issue and result

In 1959, Pakistan became concerned that Chinese maps showed areas of Pakistan in China. In 1961, Ayub Khan sent a formal note to China, there was no reply.

After Pakistan voted to grant China a seat in the United Nations, the Chinese withdrew the disputed maps in January 1962, agreeing to enter border talks in March. The willingness of the Chinese to enter the agreement was welcomed by the people of Pakistan. Negotiations between the nations officially began on October 13, 1962, and resulted in an agreement being signed on 2 March 1963. It was signed by foreign ministers Chen Yi for the Chinese and Zulfikar Ali Bhutto for the Pakistani.

China was accommodating to Pakistan's positions during the negotiations.[4] For example, according to Pakistani diplomat Abdul Sattar, after the border alignment was already agreed, the Pakistan side realized that grazing lands falling on the Chinese side had historically been used by inhabitants of Hunza. Zhou Enlai agreed to amend the boundary to add 750 square miles to the Pakistan side to preserve this historic use. China's accommodating approach in the negotiations was motivated not just by the desire to resolve boundary issues; China also wanted to demonstrate its desire for calm borders, its peaceful intentions generally, and China wanted to use a successful conclusion to the boundary issues with Pakistan to portray its border issues with India as a result of India's intransigence.

The agreement resulted in China and Pakistan each withdrawing from about 750order=flipNaNorder=flip of territory, and a boundary on the basis of the 1899 British Note to China as modified by Lord Curzon in 1905. Indian writers have insisted that in this transaction, Pakistan surrendered approximately 2050order=flipNaNorder=flip of territory to China (to which they believe it had no right in the first place). The claim given up by Pakistan was the area north of the Uprang Jilga River which also included the Raksam Plots where the Mir of Hunza had enjoyed taxing and grazing rights throughout much of the late 19th Century as part of agreements with Chinese authorities in Sinkiang. Despite this, sovereignty over area was never challenged by the Mir of Hunza, the British or the State of Jammu and Kashmir.[5]

Significance

The agreement was moderately economically advantageous to Pakistan, which received grazing lands in the deal, but of far more significance politically, as it both diminished potential for conflict between China and Pakistan and, Syed indicates, "placed China formally and firmly on record as maintaining that Kashmir did not, as yet, belong to India.[6] Time, reporting on the matter in 1963, expressed the opinion that by signing the agreement Pakistan had further "dimmed hopes of settlement" of the Kashmir conflict between Pakistan and India. Under this Sino-Pakistan Agreement, Pakistani control to a part of northern Kashmir was recognized by China.[7]

During this period, China was in dispute with India regarding Kashmir's eastern boundary, with India making claims of the border having been demarcated beforehand and China making claims that such demarcations had never happened. Pakistan and China recognized in their agreement that the border had been neither delimited nor demarcated, providing support to the Chinese position.

For Pakistan, which had border disputes on its eastern and western borders, the agreement provided relief by securing its northern border from any future contest. The Treaty also provided for clear a demarcation of the boundary for Pakistan, which would continue to serve as the boundary even after Kashmir dispute might be resolved.[8]

According to Jane's International Defence Review, the agreement was also of significance in the Cold War, as Pakistan had ties with the United States and membership in the Central Treaty Organization and the Southeast Asian Treaty Organization.[9] The agreement was part of an overall tightening of association with China for Pakistan, which resulted in Pakistan's distancing from the United States.[9] [10] [11] After defining borders, the two countries also entered into agreements with respect to trade and air-travel, the latter of which was the first such international agreement China had entered with a country that was not Communist.[12]

Modification of Treaty

Article six states that pending the final settlement of the Kashmir dispute between India and Pakistan, a fresh treaty will be drawn up.

Relation to the claim by the Republic of China

See also: One China, Foreign relations of Taiwan and Pakistan–Taiwan relations. The Republic of China now based in and commonly known as Taiwan does not recognize any Chinese territorial changes based on any border agreements signed by the People's Republic of China with any other countries, including this one, in accordance to the Constitution of the Republic of China and its Additional Articles.[13] However, due to political status of Taiwan, Pakistan and PRC do not recognize the legitimacy of ROC in Taiwan.[14]

See also

Notes and references

Notes
Citations
Bibliography

Further reading

Notes and References

  1. News: Noorani. A.G.. Jan 14, 2012. Map fetish. Frontline. 29. 01. 24 January 2020. 24 January 2020. https://web.archive.org/web/20200124215834/https://frontline.thehindu.com/static/html/fl2901/stories/20120127290108200.htm. dead.
  2. "As a friendly gesture some territory in the northern areas was surrendered to China and a treaty was signed which stated that there were no border disputes between the two countries."

  3. Web site: Trivei. Abishek. 8 July 2019. Why the 1963 Sino-Pakistan Boundary Agreement Is Unlawful in Light of the Recent ICJ Advisory Opinion on the Chagos Archipelago, 2019. 2021-11-07. www.jurist.org. 7 November 2021. https://web.archive.org/web/20211107023606/https://www.jurist.org/commentary/2019/07/abhishek-trivedi-sino-pakistan-boundary/. live.
  4. Book: Rifaat Hussain, Syed . The new great game : China and South and Central Asia in the era of reform . 2016 . . Thomas Fingar . 978-0-8047-9764-1 . Stanford, California . 120 . Sino-Pakistan Ties . 939553543.
  5. Lamb, Alastair (1991). "Kashmir A Disputed Legacy 1846-1990" (2nd Impression). Oxford University Press. pp.40, 51, 70. .
  6. News: Factbox: India and China border dispute festers . . 2006-11-15 . 13 March 2009 . 7 June 2009 . https://web.archive.org/web/20090607100101/http://www.alertnet.org/thenews/newsdesk/DEL108225.htm . live .
  7. 15 March 1963. Signing with the Red Chinese. dead. Time (magazine). https://web.archive.org/web/20130824040920/http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,870184,00.html. 24 August 2013. 28 October 2019.
  8. Book: Yousafzai, Usman Khan . 1963 Sino-Pak Treaty: A Legal Study into the Border Delimitation between Pakistan and China . 13 August 2020 . 979-8675050000.
  9. Strategic and security issues: Pakistan-China defense co-operation an enduring relationship . Jane's International Defence Review . 1993-02-01 . 28 October 2019 . https://archive.today/20130127023014/http://www.janes.com/extract/idr93/idr00903.html . dead . 2013-01-27.
  10. Book: Dixit, Jyotindra Nath . India-Pakistan in War & Peace . Routledge . 2002 . 0-415-30472-5 . 141.
  11. Book: Mitra, Subrata Kumar . Mike Enskat . Clemens Spiess . Political parties in South Asia . Greenwood Publishing Group . 2004 . 0-275-96832-4 . 157.
  12. Syed, 93-94.
  13. Web site: ROC Chronology: Jan 1911 – Dec 2000 . 23 April 2009 . https://web.archive.org/web/20101229224745/http://www.gio.gov.tw/taiwan-website/5-gp/yearbook/2001/appendix1-1.htm#1950 . 29 December 2010 . dead. “The Ministry of Foreign Affairs declares border agreements signed between the Peking regime and Outer Mongolia and Pakistan illegal and not binding on the ROC.“
  14. News: Islamuddin . Sajid . Pakistan reiterates support for China over Taiwan, South China Sea issues . 2023-05-07 . Anadolu Ajansı.