The Signorini problem is an elastostatics problem in linear elasticity: it consists in finding the elastic equilibrium configuration of an anisotropic non-homogeneous elastic body, resting on a rigid frictionless surface and subject only to its mass forces. The name was coined by Gaetano Fichera to honour his teacher, Antonio Signorini: the original name coined by him is problem with ambiguous boundary conditions.
The problem was posed by Antonio Signorini during a course taught at the Istituto Nazionale di Alta Matematica in 1959, later published as the article, expanding a previous short exposition he gave in a note published in 1933. himself called it problem with ambiguous boundary conditions,[1] since there are two alternative sets of boundary conditions the solution must satisfy on any given contact point. The statement of the problem involves not only equalities but also inequalities, and it is not a priori known what of the two sets of boundary conditions is satisfied at each point. Signorini asked to determine if the problem is well-posed or not in a physical sense, i.e. if its solution exists and is unique or not: he explicitly invited young analysts to study the problem.[2]
Gaetano Fichera and Mauro Picone attended the course, and Fichera started to investigate the problem: since he found no references to similar problems in the theory of boundary value problems,[3] he decided to approach it by starting from first principles, specifically from the virtual work principle.
During Fichera's researches on the problem, Signorini began to suffer serious health problems: nevertheless, he desired to know the answer to his question before his death. Picone, being tied by a strong friendship with Signorini, began to chase Fichera to find a solution: Fichera himself, being tied as well to Signorini by similar feelings, perceived the last months of 1962 as worrying days.[4] Finally, on the first days of January 1963, Fichera was able to give a complete proof of the existence of a unique solution for the problem with ambiguous boundary condition, which he called the "Signorini problem" to honour his teacher. A preliminary research announcement, later published as, was written up and submitted to Signorini exactly a week before his death. Signorini expressed great satisfaction to see a solution to his question.
A few days later, Signorini had with his family Doctor, Damiano Aprile, the conversation quoted above.[5]
The solution of the Signorini problem coincides with the birth of the field of variational inequalities.[6]
\scriptstyle\boldsymbol{u}(\boldsymbol{x})=\left(u1(\boldsymbol{x}),u2(\boldsymbol{x}),u3(\boldsymbol{x})\right)
A
\scriptstyle\partialA
n
\Sigma
\scriptstyle\boldsymbol{f}(\boldsymbol{x})=\left(f1(\boldsymbol{x}),f2(\boldsymbol{x}),f3(\boldsymbol{x})\right)
\scriptstyle\boldsymbol{g}(\boldsymbol{x})=\left(g1(\boldsymbol{x}),g2(\boldsymbol{x}),g3(\boldsymbol{x})\right)
\scriptstyle\partialA\setminus\Sigma
A
\Sigma
\partial\sigmaik | |
\partialxk |
-fi=0 fori=1,2,3
written using the Einstein notation as all in the following development, the ordinary boundary conditions on
\scriptstyle\partialA\setminus\Sigma
\sigmaiknk-gi=0 fori=1,2,3
and the following two sets of boundary conditions on
\Sigma
\scriptstyle\boldsymbol{\sigma}=\boldsymbol{\sigma}(\boldsymbol{u})
If
\scriptstyle\boldsymbol{\tau}=(\tau1,\tau2,\tau3)
\Sigma
\begin{cases} uini&=0\\ \sigmaiknink&\geq0\\ \sigmaikni\tauk&=0 \end{cases}
\begin{cases} uini&>0\\ \sigmaiknink&=0\\ \sigmaikni\tauk&=0 \end{cases}
Let's analyze their meaning:
n
n
\tau
\Sigma
\scriptstyle+1
\scriptstyle-1
\Sigma
u
n
n
u
n
n
Each system expresses a unilateral constraint, in the sense that they express the physical impossibility of the elastic body to penetrate into the surface where it rests: the ambiguity is not only in the unknown values non-zero quantities must satisfy on the contact set but also in the fact that it is not a priori known if a point belonging to that set satisfies the system of boundary conditions or . The set of points where is satisfied is called the area of support of the elastic body on
\Sigma
\Sigma
The above formulation is general since the Cauchy stress tensor i.e. the constitutive equation of the elastic body has not been made explicit: it is equally valid assuming the hypothesis of linear elasticity or the ones of nonlinear elasticity. However, as it would be clear from the following developments, the problem is inherently nonlinear, therefore assuming a linear stress tensor does not simplify the problem.
The form assumed by Signorini and Fichera for the elastic potential energy is the following one (as in the previous developments, the Einstein notation is adopted)
W(\boldsymbol{\varepsilon})=aik,jh(\boldsymbol{x})\varepsilonik\varepsilonjh
where
\scriptstyle\boldsymbol{a}(\boldsymbol{x})=\left(aik,jh(\boldsymbol{x})\right)
\scriptstyle\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}=\boldsymbol{\varepsilon}(\boldsymbol{u})=\left(\varepsilonik(\boldsymbol{u})\right)=\left(
1 | |
2 |
\left(
\partialui | |
\partialxk |
+
\partialuk | |
\partialxi |
\right)\right)
\sigmaik=-
\partialW | |
\partial\varepsilonik |
fori,k=1,2,3
and it is linear with respect to the components of the infinitesimal strain tensor; however, it is not homogeneous nor isotropic.
As for the section on the formal statement of the Signorini problem, the contents of this section and the included subsections follow closely the treatment of Gaetano Fichera in,, and also : obviously, the exposition focuses on the basics steps of the proof of the existence and uniqueness for the solution of problem,,, and, rather than the technical details.
The first step of the analysis of Fichera as well as the first step of the analysis of Antonio Signorini in is the analysis of the potential energy, i.e. the following functional
I(\boldsymbol{u})=\intAW(\boldsymbol{x},\boldsymbol{\varepsilon})dx-\intAuifidx-\int\partialuigid\sigma
where
u
\scriptstylel{U}\Sigma
was able to prove that the admissible displacement
u
I(u)
C1
\scriptstyle\barA
A
\scriptstyle\boldsymbol{u}\inl{U}\Sigma
\left.
d | |
dt |
I(\boldsymbol{u}+t\boldsymbol{v})\right\vertt=0=-\intA\sigmaik(\boldsymbol{u})\varepsilonik(\boldsymbol{v})dx-\intAvifidx-\int\partialvigid\sigma\geq0 \forall\boldsymbol{v}\inl{U}\Sigma
Defining the following functionals
B(\boldsymbol{u},\boldsymbol{v})=-\intA\sigmaik(\boldsymbol{u})\varepsilonik(\boldsymbol{v})dx \boldsymbol{u},\boldsymbol{v}\inl{U}\Sigma
and
F(\boldsymbol{v})=\intAvifidx+\int\partialvigid\sigma \boldsymbol{v}\inl{U}\Sigma
the preceding inequality is can be written as
B(\boldsymbol{u},\boldsymbol{v})-F(\boldsymbol{v})\geq0 \forall\boldsymbol{v}\inl{U}\Sigma
This inequality is the variational inequality for the Signorini problem.