| Conflict: | Siege of Vyshgorod |
| Partof: | the 1171–1173 Kievan succession crisis |
| Size: | 250 |
| Date: | 8 September – 18/19 December 1173 |
| Place: | near Vyshhorod, Kievan Rus' |
| Result: | Kiev and allies victory; defeat of Andrey Bogolyubsky's coalition |
| Combatant1: | Andrey's coalition |
| Combatant2: | Кiev and allies
|
| Commander1: | Yurievichi (Suzdalia): Yury Bogolyubsky Mikhalko Yurievich Vsevolod "the Big Nest"-----Olgovichi (Chernigov): Sviatoslav Vsevolodich-----Rostislavichi (Smolensk)
|
| Commander2: | Rostislavichi (Smolensk)
|
| Strength1: | 50,000 (per Kievan Chronicle, probably exaggerated) |
| Strength2: | unknown |
The battle and siege of Vyshgorod (modern Vyshhorod) took place in late 1173, during the 1171–1173 Kievan succession crisis.Commanding another broad coalition army, prince Andrey Bogolyubsky of Vladimir-Suzdal launched a second campaign against Kiev (modern Kyiv), capital city of Kievan Rus'. After the conquest and sack of Kiev in March 1169 by an earlier coalition assembled by Andrey, his brother Gleb of Pereyaslavl had been installed as the new grand prince, only to die under suspicious circumstances in January 1171. A series of princes briefly reigned in Kiev thereafter, with Andrey usually managing to put his preferred candidates on its throne, until his brother Vsevolod "the Big Nest" was driven out by the Rostislavichi of Smolensk in April 1172, enthroning Rurik Rostislavich. Andrey was most displeased when he heard about this, and assembled another coalition army under his son Yury to militarily enforce his will on Kiev.
The coalition army, consisting of Yurievichi princes of Suzdalia, the Novgorod Republic, Olgovichi of Chernigov (modern Chernihiv) and various princes from present-day Belarus, approached Kiev by crossing the Dnieper from the northeast, where a pitched battle occurred, the indecisive battle of Vyshgorod. The defending Kievans and Rostislavichi then retreated into the medieval hill fortress of Vyshgorod, beleaguered by coalition forces. Reinforcements from the Iziaslavichi of Volhynia relieved them, delivering a crushing defeat upon the northern coalition, which fell apart in the aftermath. The conflict established a new balance of power, definitively breaking the short-lived Kievan overlordship (March 1169 – January 1171) of Andrey, who was assassinated by his own courtiers the next year.
After the death of Yuri Dolgoruky in 1157, Andrey Bogolyubsky ousted his younger brothers Mikhail "Mikhalko" Yurievich and Vsevolod "the Big Nest" from Rostov and Suzdal in 1162, thus uniting his father's patrimony in Vladimir-Suzdal under his sole rule (samovlastets). He expelled his four brothers to the Byzantine Empire together with their mother, Yuri's second wife. He made the city of Vladimir on the Klyazma his capital, fortifying, beautifying and expanding it, while taking up residence in a castle in the nearby village of Bogolyubovo; hence his nickname "Bogolyubsky". He made several attempts to subjugate the Novgorod Republic to his power as well (but he would be defeated in 1169/70). In 1164 he unsuccessfully tried to create a church metropolitanate for Suzdalia, separate from Kiev, but was overruled by the patriarch of Constantinople.
See main article: Sack of Kiev (1169) and Siege of Novgorod (1170). Andrey's long-standing rivalry with his Mstislavichi cousins reached its peak when Mstislav Iziaslavich, the son of Iziaslav Mstislavich, his father's long-time enemy, was elected prince in Kiev. At the same time, the Novgorod veche expelled prince Sviatoslav Rostislavich, who turned to Andrey for help. The Novgorodians, in turn, allied themselves with Mstislav. This was the beginning of a bloody internecine war. The princes of Murom, Ryazan, Smolensk, Polotsk, Novgorod-Seversk, Chernigov and Dorogobuzh sided with Andrey. Their combined army laid siege to Kiev in 1169, and upon conquering the capital, they sacked Kiev.[1]
Andrey Bogolyubsky, himself not present at the sacking, had ordered his brother Gleb Yurievich of Pereyaslavl to be installed on the Kievan throne. While some scholars have interpreted these events as signifying that Andrey put a weak puppet in Kiev and made it a vassal of Vladimir-Suzdal, other scholars observed that Gleb's position as prince of Pereyaslavl' meant that he was heir apparent to the throne of Kiev, as well as the most senior Yurievichi prince, thereby restoring the order of succession by agnatic seniority that had been disturbed by Mstislav Iziaslavich. However, Andrey's further attempts to increase his influence in Rus' failed – in 1170, his troops were defeated in the Siege of Novgorod (1170) by the young Novgorod prince, Roman Mstislavich.
Nevertheless, Andrey retained significant power and influence within the realm, enabling him to put some of his allies on several princely thrones of Rus' cities. In 1171 (20 January 1171 according to Jaroslaw Pelenski), Gleb died, probably due to being poisoned, thus triggering yet another succession crisis for the Kievan throne. At the invitation of the younger Rostislavichi of Smolensk, Vladimir Mstislavich (the youngest son of Mstislav the Great) sat down in Kiev, but died soon after. Andrey then gave Kiev to the elder Rostislavich, Roman Rostislavich in July 1171. But some time after, a conflict arose between them, and Roman was forced to return to Smolensk. Andrey sent his brother, Mikhail "Mikhalko" Yurievich, to Kiev, but he did not want to go to the Rus' land (the region around Kiev), and sent his brother Vsevolod "the Big Nest" and nephew Yaropolk Rostislavich instead. Vsevolod reigned in Kiev for 5 weeks, but a coalition of deposed Rostislavichi and Mstislav Rostislavich of Volhynia successfully recaptured Kiev on 1 April 1172, with Vsevolod being imprisoned by Davyd Rostislavich, and his brother, Rurik Rostislavich, becoming the new grand prince. This way, the junior generation again seized power, upsetting the senior princes including Andrey. When Andrey learned about this, he ordered the Rostislavichi to leave the Rus' land and return to Smolensk. However, they refused and cut the ambassador's beard, which led to the outbreak of hostilities. Senior princes formed another coalition led by Andrey, and marched on Kiev.
In History of Ukraine-Rusʹ Volume 2 (1899), Ukrainian historian Mykhailo Hrushevsky tentatively reconstructed the events of the Kiev campaign of 1173 in the Kievan Chronicle, remarking that it had 'an epic tone and a pompous, rhetorical style.' Polish historian Jaroslaw Pelenski analysed in 1988 that the 1171–1173 Kievan succession crisis and Kiev campaign of 1173 were 'described in three interrelated narrations incorporated in the Kievan Chronicle:
Pelenski noted that the Kievan skazanie is highly partisan, heavily criticising Andrey Bogolyubsky in religious-ideological terms, including Biblical quotations, for being under the influence of the devil, committing the cardinal sin of pride, arrogance, haughtiness, and boasting, for which God supposedly punished him with a humiliating defeat.
By comparison, the Suzdalian Chronicle has very little to say, limiting itself to a few sentences in half a column. On the one hand, the editor(s) of the Kievan Chronicle apparently had no issues with including ideologically contradictory narratives in its compilation – blaming the 1169 Sack of Kiev ordered by Andrey on the city's inhabitants' own "sins", and glorifying Andrey's piety after his assassination in 1174, but virulently rebuking him for his 1173 Kiev campaign and siege of Vyshgorod – as long as it gave an inclusive history of all of Kievan Rus'. On the other hand, Pelenski argued that the compilers of the Suzdalian Chronicle were much more selective, usually limiting themselves to events concerning Vladimir-Suzdal, and giving them their own political and ideological twists as needed.
The Novgorod First Chronicle (NPL) has an even shorter account than the Suzdalian. The only significant differences include that, according to the NPL, the coalition forces – consisting of only Novgorodians and Rostovians, and mentioning only Andrey's son Yury, then prince of Novgorod – are said to have besieged Vyshgorod for 7 weeks rather than 9, and that the Novgorodian troops 'came back all well to Novgorod', apparently not having suffered heavy casualties, and not saying anything about having been defeated.