Siege of Mount Tabor explained

Conflict:Siege of Mount Tabor (1217)
Partof:the Fifth Crusade
Date:30 November – 7 December 1217
Place:Mount Tabor
Result:Ayyubid victory
Combatant1:
Duchy of Austria
Kingdom of Jerusalem
Kingdom of Cyprus
Principality of Antioch
Knights Templar
Knights Hospitaller
Teutonic Order
Combatant2: Ayyubid Dynasty
Commander1:John of Brienne
Bohemond IV of Antioch
Guérin de Montaigu
Commander2:Badr al-Din Muhammad Al-Hakkari
Strength1:Unknown
Strength2:2,000 men
Casualties1:Heavy
Casualties2:Unknown

The siege of Mount Tabor was a military engagement between the Crusader armies of the Fifth Crusade and the Ayyubids. The combined Crusader armies laid siege to Mount Tabor, which was the objective of the Hungarian Crusade. The crusaders ultimately failed to capture the fort.

Background

In 1215, Pope Innocent III held a council on November 1215 to declare a new crusade, calling to liberate the Christian prisoners and to capture the Muslim fortress at Mount Tabor. The Hungarian king, Andrew II, and the Austrian Duke, Leopold VI, answered the call and began assembling and equipping their armies. Both armies gathered in the Croatian city of Spalato. The Austrians first set sail and arrived in Acre, and 16 days later, the Hungarians arrived in late September 1217.[1] [2]

Leopold invited Bohemond IV of Antioch and his vassals to join him, which he did. The king of Cyprus, Hugh I, arrived in Acre with a large number of Turcopoles.[3] The Austrian and Hungarian armies, along with the King of Jerusalem, Cyprus, Antiochian troops, and the three military orders, launched an offensive to enhance the security of Acre.[4] [5]

They left on November 4 and explored the area around the Mount Tabor fortress. On November 10, they crossed the Jordan River close to the Sea of Galilee and headed north along the shore. They crossed Jacob's ford once more and made their way back to Acre. They had amassed a sizable amount of loot; they sacked Baisan and looted the city. They had also fulfilled their promise to make a pilgrimage, going to such sacred locations and taking a bath in Jordan.[6]

Siege

After a brief rest, the Crusader armies, without the king of Hungary, launched an attack against Mount Tabor. Led by King John of Brienne, they arrived there on November 30. The fortress at Mount Tabor consisted of 77 towers and had a garrison of 2,000 men, led by Badr al-Din Muhammad Al-Hakkari. It was regarded by Muslims as unconquerable, and only the help of a local convert boy who knew a hidden path to the fort encouraged the Crusaders to attack it. On December 3, Sunday, the Crusaders climbed up the mountain during heavy fog. The Patriarch of Jerusalem led the way while the clergy sang and prayed. The Crusaders came so close to those walls that their lances could touch the walls; however, the Ayyubid garrison quickly became alerted to what was happening and launched a sortie that successfully pushed the Crusaders down the mountain, despite the bravery that King John showed during the fight.[7] [8] [9] [10]

Upon their descent, King John held a council with the Master of Hospitallers and Bohemond, along with the Syrian Barons, who both had disputes regarding the continuation of the siege. Bohemond strongly advocated for abandoning the attack. On December 5, some of the Crusaders, including the Templars and Hospitallers, unsatisfied with the decision of their leaders, decided to launch another attack on the fortress. This time, they placed ladders against the walls; however, the Ayyubids counter-attacked using Greek fire and scattered the Crusaders with heavy losses. Disheartened by this failure, the Crusaders decided to abandon the siege, and on December 7, they withdrew from Mount Tabor and headed to Acre.[11] [12] [13] [14]

Aftermath

Few months later, the Muslims decided to give up the fortress. They destroyed the fort and left, thinking it would be worthless to defend in the long run.[15] [16] [17]

Sources

32.6872°N 35.3903°W

Notes and References

  1. László Veszprémy, p. 93–94
  2. Kenneth Setton, p. 386-388
  3. Kenneth Setton, p. 388
  4. László Veszprémy, p. 94
  5. Kenneth Setton, p. 388-389
  6. László Veszprémy, p. 95
  7. László Veszprémy, p. 95-96
  8. Kenneth Setton, p. 391-392
  9. David Cook, p. 135-136
  10. R. Stephen Humphreys, p. 157
  11. László Veszprémy, p. 96
  12. Kenneth Setton, p. 392
  13. David Cook, p. 136
  14. R. Stephen Humphreys, p. 157-158
  15. László Veszprémy, p. 96
  16. Kenneth Setton, p. 392
  17. David Cook, p. 136