Sidewalk Toronto Explained

Sidewalk Toronto was a cancelled urban development project proposed by Sidewalk Labs at Quayside, a waterfront area in Toronto, Ontario, Canada. The project was first initiated by Waterfront Toronto in 2017 by issuing the request for proposal (RFP) for development on the Quayside area. Sidewalk Labs, a subsidiary of Google (formerly its parent company Alphabet Inc.), issued the winning bid in 2017. The Master Innovation Development Plan (MIDP) was created in 2019 through conversations with over 21,000 Toronto residents and had aimed to be an innovative reinvention of Toronto's neglected eastern downtown waterfront.[1]

Alphabet had announced the cancellation of the project on May 7, 2020.[2] Sidewalk Toronto had aimed to utilize technology to create a smart urban area that improves the quality of life of its residents, while also using it as a testing ground for future urban design projects and technology. The high-tech plan drew criticism, particularly over data privacy issues regarding the robust data collection in the proposed community. Alphabet cited economic concerns caused by the uncertainty of the economy experiencing the COVID-19 pandemic.[2]

History

Request for proposal (2017)

Waterfront Toronto holds the right to develop the eastern downtown area of the Toronto waterfront, as the directing agency of the waterfront lands. In March 2017, Waterfront Toronto issued a request for proposal (RFP) to solicit bids for an "Innovation and Funding Partner" that would assist the organization with the planning for the future development of a mixed-use mixed-income project called the Quayside development.[3] The development was envisioned as a pilot project for Toronto's future urban planning as a world-class city. The RFP set objectives to meet C40 Climate Positive sustainability, test cleantech building materials, provide 500–800 units of affordable rental housing, establish a complete community with open public spaces and strong links to adjacent neighborhoods, develop information infrastructures to aid decision-making and attract innovative businesses and talent, and secure funding and investment partnerships. The innovation and funding partner was expected to invest from short-term pre-development research and planning, and could be offered the opportunity to continue to work with Waterfront Toronto in future phases of work, helping to fund infrastructure and pilot projects.[3]

Sidewalk Labs won the RFP in October 2017 and officially launched Sidewalk Toronto. According to their press release, their plan was to "design a new kind of mixed-use, complete community" and apply new digital technology to "create people-centered neighborhoods." Sidewalk Labs committed  million to work with Waterfront Toronto to develop a plan for the Quayside neighborhood and test pilot projects that could potentially be used in Toronto or elsewhere. They began working on a Master Innovation and Development Plan (MIDP) to form the basis for the Quayside development.[4]

Sidewalk Labs' bid had proposed features such as roads optimized for self-driving vehicles, creation of a test-bed for developing future urban planning ideas, and fully integrated physical and digital layers of the urban system. This digital layer would have managed a repository of data and provided an application programming interface for third-party developers.[5] As the planning work progressed, there was an interest in relocating Google's Canadian headquarters to Quayside, and creating 2,500 net new jobs at Google Canada.

Development plan

In the agreement between Waterfront Toronto and Sidewalk Labs, they established eleven different areas of focus, referred to as "pillars" to develop the plan:[6]

A public engagement plan sought feedback from Toronto residents through a series of public talks and round-table meetings, engagement in design, and online engagement.[7]

Additionally, Sidewalk Labs had established its own core principles to guide its projects:

Sidewalk RFP submission

Sidewalk Labs' RFP submission envisioned urban planning in five layers. These were the physical layers of utility infrastructure, transportation infrastructure, the public realm and buildings, plus a digital layer which enabled the physical layers to be more efficient and adaptable. According to the proposal:[5]

Civic data trust

There had been numerous critics concerned of Orwellian privacy control with the Sidewalk project due to the nature of the public systems created.[8] As a result of criticism about the privacy of residents and commodification of data collection, Sidewalk Labs shifted their direction for constructing the digital layer, introducing the concept of a civic data trust.

In an October 2018 press release, Sidewalk Labs renounced the right to own information generated from Quayside. The release argued that "urban data" – community data cleared of personal information – should be considered as a public asset and be freely available. They proposed that the data should be owned and managed by an independent civic data trust, which would steward the data collected in the physical layers of the planned development, and approve and control its collection and dissemination. The proposed trust would be guided by a charter ensuring that data is collected and used in a way that is beneficial to the community, protects privacy, and spurs innovation and investment. If a company wanted to collect or use the data for more proprietary or commercial purposes, or it required personally-identifiable information, approval should be required from the trust.[9]

Sidewalk Labs provided examples of data repositories in other cities: In Barcelona, collected data is pooled into a central repository and access is managed by the city; in Estonia, companies store their own collected data but make it available via standardized protocols.

Data governance

In November 2019, Sidewalk Labs delivered a "Digital Innovation Appendix" to provide real-world examples and flesh out data governance plans for the project, including "responsible artificial intelligence" guidelines and data minimization and clearing of personal data by default. They also incorporated feedback giving Waterfront Toronto the lead on data governance, rather than an independent Urban Data Trust.[10] In February 2020, Waterfront Toronto endorsed 144 of 160 innovation proposals from Sidewalk Labs, saying the other 16 could be dropped, altered or replaced.[11] Waterfront Toronto's advisory panel stated that it was premature to provide advice, and had concerns about the feasibility of some innovations proposed within the project, and desired more clarity on the benefits that might justify the proposed collection and use of data.[12] [13] They subsequently requested additional context for Sidewalk Toronto's earlier allegations regarding data security.

Criticisms

According to open-government advocate Bianca Wylie, the fundamental problem of this project is the smart city model itself. She argues that the model is formulated because "corporations are seeking to exert influence on urban spaces and democratic governance."[14] She claims that not just Sidewalk Labs, but elected officials and politicians of Toronto considered the plan as a way of boosting the economy and brand the city as a world leader supported by a leading tech company.[15] Moreover, she argues that these kinds of development projects, especially digital government projects, have been considered as stable financial revenue for the companies involved. By embedding a technical product in a government system, it would be extremely difficult to pull out from the system, thus making the government market highly attractive.[16]

There have also been various criticisms about the proposed civic data trust. Opposing the argument that data cleared of personal information is safe to be publicly available, a study published in Science has found that this data can be restored to its original state when a dataset is associated with different datasets.[17] If a company gained access to that public data, then only the company would earn the revenue.

In November 2019, in response to feedback, the proposal for data governance was shifted from recommending an independent Urban Data Trust, to vesting authority in the existing Waterfront Toronto government partnership.

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Sidewalk Toronto. 2019. Toronto Tomorrow: A new approach for inclusive growth. November 1, 2019. https://web.archive.org/web/20190921010547/https://storage.googleapis.com/sidewalk-toronto-ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/06/23202306/MIDP_Volume0_AccessibleDocument.pdf. September 21, 2019. live.
  2. Web site: Sidewalk Labs cancels plan to build high-tech neighbourhood in Toronto amid COVID-19 CBC News.
  3. Web site: Request for Proposals: Innovation and Funding Partner for the Quayside Development Opportunity. Waterfront Toronto. March 17, 2017. November 1, 2019. Waterfront Toronto. https://web.archive.org/web/20190916152355/https://quaysideto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/04/Waterfront-Toronto-Request-for-Proposals-March-17-2017.pdf. September 16, 2019. live.
  4. New District in Toronto Will Tackle the Challenges of Urban Growth. Webb. Carol. Levitan. Dan. October 17, 2017. November 1, 2019. Canadian Newswire. https://web.archive.org/web/20180131063437/https://www.newswire.ca/news-releases/new-district-in-toronto-will-tackle-the-challenges-of-urban-growth-651305763.html. January 31, 2018. live.
  5. Web site: Vision Sections of RFP Submission. Sidewalk Toronto. October 17, 2017. Sidewalk Toronto. November 28, 2018. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20181127044606/https://sidewalktoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/05/Sidewalk-Labs-Vision-Sections-of-RFP-Submission.pdf. November 27, 2018.
  6. Web site: Plan Development Agreement between Toronto Waterfront Revitalization Corporation and Sidewalk Labs LLC. Waterfront Toronto and Sidewalk Labs LLC. July 31, 2018. Sidewalk Toronto. November 12, 2018. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20181127094844/https://sidewalktoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/07/Plan-Development-Agreement_July312018_Fully-Executed.pdf. November 27, 2018.
  7. Web site: Public Engagement Plan. Sidewalk Labs LLC. February 2, 2018. November 28, 2018. dead. https://web.archive.org/web/20180725204345/https://sidewalktoronto.ca/wp-content/uploads/2018/04/Sidewalk-Toronto-Public-Engagement-Plan.pdf. July 25, 2018.
  8. News: Opinion The fight against Google's smart city. Washington Post. en. November 28, 2018. https://web.archive.org/web/20181113210050/https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/theworldpost/wp/2018/08/08/sidewalk-labs/. November 13, 2018. live.
  9. An Update on Data Governance for Sidewalk Toronto. Dawson. Alyssa Harvey. October 15, 2018. Sidewalk Talk. November 28, 2018. https://web.archive.org/web/20181126183946/https://medium.com/sidewalk-talk/an-update-on-data-governance-for-sidewalk-toronto-d810245f10f7. November 26, 2018. live.
  10. Web site: Sidewalk Labs releases appendix to Toronto neighborhood plan. November 15, 2019. StateScoop. en. May 3, 2020.
  11. Web site: Waterfront Toronto extends Sidewalk Labs approval deadline due to COVID-19. March 26, 2020. BetaKit. en-CA. May 3, 2020.
  12. Web site: Sidewalk Labs urged to justify digital solutions. February 27, 2020. Smart Cities World. En. May 3, 2020.
  13. Web site: Waterfront Toronto advisory panel still has concerns about Sidewalk Labs' data collection, new report says. February 26, 2020. thestar.com. en. May 3, 2020.
  14. Web site: Wylie . Bianca . Searching for the Smart City's Democratic Future . Centre for International Governance Innovation . January 18, 2020.
  15. News: Google Is Still Planning a 'Smart City' in Toronto Despite Major Privacy Concerns. August 1, 2018. Motherboard. November 28, 2018. en-us. https://web.archive.org/web/20181125154313/https://motherboard.vice.com/en_us/article/xwkv9z/google-planning-smart-city-toronto-despite-privacy-concerns. November 25, 2018. live.
  16. Centre for Ethics. Ethics in the City: Bianca Wylie, Countering the Digital Consensus. March 16, 2018. November 28, 2018. https://web.archive.org/web/20190927042326/https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XG_AxMuI2do. September 27, 2019. live.
  17. Montjoye. Yves-Alexandre de. Radaelli. Laura. Singh. Vivek Kumar. Pentland. Alex "Sandy". January 30, 2015. Unique in the shopping mall: On the reidentifiability of credit card metadata. Science. en. 347. 6221. 536–539. 10.1126/science.1256297. 0036-8075. 25635097. 2015Sci...347..536D. free. 1721.1/96321. free.