Shuanghuan Laibao | |
Production: | 2003–2010 |
Model Years: | 2004–2010 (Shuanghuan Laibao S-RV) |
Class: | Mid-size SUV |
Body Style: | 5-door SUV |
Layout: | Front-engine, rear-wheel-drive |
Aka: | Shuanghuan Laibao S-RV Shuanghuan Rabo S-RV Shuanghuan Rabo Xinkai S-RV |
Assembly: | Shijiazhuang, Hebei, China |
Engine: | EQ491i 2.0L petrol I4 JM491Q-ME 2.2L petrol I4 4G63V16 2.4L petrol I4 |
Transmission: | 5-speed manual |
Wheelbase: | 2850NaN |
Length: | 4600NaN |
Width: | 1770NaN |
Height: | 1720NaN |
Predecessor: | Shuanghuan Laiwang |
The Shuanghuan Laibao (来宝) or Shuanghuan Laibao S-RV is a midsize SUV with the design inspired by the Honda CR-V. It was manufactured by Shuanghuan from 2003 to 2010,[1] with the chassis based on the chassis of Shuanghuan Laiwang, which was designed based on the chassis of the fifth generation 1992 Toyota Hilux.[2]
The engine options of the Laibao S-RV includes a 2.0 liter inline-four engine producing 112hp and 163Nm of torque, a 2.2 liter inline-four engine producing 103hp and 193Nm of torque, and a 2.4 liter inline-four engine producing 125hp and 190Nm of torque, with all engines mated to a 5-speed manual gearbox.[3]
Prices before discontinuation of the Laibao S-RV in 2004 ranges from 96,800 yuan to 115,800 yuan.[4] [5]
The design of the updated 2003 Shuanghuan Laibao S-RV is controversial as the midsize SUV heavily resembles the second generation Honda CR-V compact crossover.
On November 13, 2003, Honda filed a lawsuit stating that the Shuanghuan Laibao is a violation of the intellectual property of Honda, as the Shuanghuan Laibao heavily resembles the second generation Honda CR-V. In March 2006, China's State Intellectual Property Office made the decision stating that Honda's patent for the design of the Honda CR-V compact crossover is invalid.
In 2010, the Beijing People's High Court finally made the decision that the Shuanghuan Laibao of Shijazhuang Shuanghuan Automobile Co. had infringed the design patent of the Honda CR-V. Shijazhuang Shuanghuan Automobile Co. has been fined 16 million yuan (equivalent to $2.4 million at that time), the final claim was 45 million yuan.[6] [7]