Shoemaker v. United States explained

Litigants:Shoemaker v. United States
Arguedate:November 28–29
Argueyear:1892
Decidedate:January 18
Decideyear:1893
Usvol:147
Uspage:282
Holding:Congress may increase the duties of an existing office without rendering it necessary that the incumbent again be appointed as long as the new duties are germane to those the office already holds.
Majority:Shiras
Joinmajority:unanimous
Lawsapplied:U.S. Const. art. II, § 2, cl. 2

Shoemaker v. United States, 147 U.S. 282 (1893), was a landmark decision of the Supreme Court of the United States on the United States Constitution's Appointments Clause. The Court declared Congress may expand the duties of an existing office without rendering it necessary that the incumbent again be nominated, confirmed and appointed as long as the new duties are "germane" to those already held by the office.

See also