The Sheldon Coin Grading Scale is a 70-point coin grading scale used in the numismatic assessment of a coin's quality. The American Numismatic Association based its Official ANA Grading Standards in large part on the Sheldon scale.[1] The scale was created by William Herbert Sheldon.
In 1949, the original scale was first presented in Dr. William H. Sheldon's Early American Cents, 1793–1814 titled "A Quantitative Scale for condition" as a way to grade Large cents. The scale is known today as the Sheldon scale.[2]
| Grade | |
|---|---|
| 1 | Basal State-1 |
| 2 | Fair |
| 3 | Very Fair |
| 4, 5, 6 | Good |
| 7, 8, 10 | Very Good |
| 12, 15 | Fine |
| 20, 30 | Very Fine |
| 40 | Extremely Fine |
| 50 | About Uncirculated |
| 60 | Mint State |
| 65 | Mint State |
| 70 | Mint State |
By 1953 the original Sheldon scale had become outdated. It was not until the 1970s, however, that the ANA chose to adapt the scale for use on all US coins.[3] The scale used today is a modification of the original Sheldon scale, with added adjustments, additions, deletions, and modifications to it.[4] [5]
Note: Some early American coin varieties are almost always found to be weakly struck in places. This does not bring the grade of these coins down as in some cases no flawless coin exists for the variety. Early coins in general usually have planchet quality issues which depending on severity and market conditions can bring the grade down for other coins.[6] [7]
| Grade | Grade code(s) | Description | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Poor | PO | Clear enough to identify, date may be worn smooth with one side of the coin blanked. Coins that are very badly corroded may also fall under this category. |
| 2 | Fair | FR | Some detail shows |
| 3 | About Good | AG | Readable lettering although very heavily worn. The date and design may be worn smooth. |
| 4 | Good | G, G4 | Rims of the coin are slightly worn, design is visible, but faint in areas, with many parts of the coin worn flat. Peripheral lettering nearly full. |
| 6 | Choice Good | G+, G6 | Rims of the coin are complete. Peripheral lettering is full. |
| 8 | Very Good | VG, VG8 | Slight detail shows, with two to three letters of the word LIBERTY showing in coins with this feature. |
| 10 | Choice Very Good | VG+, VG10 | Slightly clearer design-features, with five or possibly six letters of the word LIBERTY showing in coins with this feature. |
| 12 | Fine | F, F12 | Some deeply recessed areas show detail. All lettering is sharp. The letters in the word LIBERTY show completely in coins with this feature, but may be weak. Moderate to considerable, but even wear throughout the coin. |
| 15 | Choice Fine | F+, F15 | Slightly more detail in the recessed areas of the coin. |
| 20 | Very Fine | VF, VF20 | Moderate wear on the higher surface features. |
| 25 | Very Fine | VF25 | All lettering and major features are sharp. Light to moderate, but even wear is seen on the surface and high points of the coin. |
| 30 | Choice Very Fine | Ch.VF, VF+, VF30 | All lettering and major features are sharp. Light, but even wear is seen on the surface and high points of the coin. |
| 35 | Choice Very Fine | Ch. VF, VF+, VF35 | All lettering and major features are sharp. Light, but even wear is seen on the surface and high points of the coin. Traces of mint luster may show. |
| 40 | Extremely Fine/Extra Fine | Ex. Fine, EF40 | Overall sharpness. Light wear seen at the highest points of the coin. Details of the coin are sharp. Traces of mint luster may show. |
| 45 | Choice Extremely Fine | Ch. Ex. Fine, EF45 | Slight, overall wear is seen at the highest points of the coin (examples being raised features). All the details are full and very sharp. Mint luster may show only in protected areas of the coin's surface (Such as between the star points). |
| 50 | About Uncirculated/Almost Uncirculated | AU, AU50 | Traces of wear at the highest points of the coin. At least half of the original mint luster remains. |
| 55 | Choice About Uncirculated | Ch. AU, AU55 | Three-fourths of the original mint luster remains. |
| 58 | Choice About Uncirculated | Ch. AU, AU58 | Almost all of the original mint luster remains |
Mint State refers to a coin minted for regular distribution that was never actually put into circulation, i.e., it was never used for daily commerce; it is uncirculated.[4] Since individuals never used these coins to purchase goods or services, the coins were not handed from one person to another; they were not jumbled up with other coins in pockets or purses; and they were not repeatedly counted—and touched—by retailers and bank personnel. Consequently, uncirculated coins should not show signs of wear.
In modern-day United States numismatics, collectors, coin dealers, and third-party grading services grade mint state coins using a number from 60 to 70 inclusive, with 70 representing a perfect coin with no visible blemishes. Coins in the lower grade range (60-63), are usually unworn, and may suffer from weak striking, bag marks and other defects that make them less attractive to the collector. Some Mint State early coins appear to be circulated due to weak strikes, die cracks, planchet problems, or metal quality. There are a few United States coins for which no mint state specimens exist,[8] [9] such as the 1792 silver dime, and the 1802 Draped Bust (Heraldic Eagle reverse) silver half dime.[10] [11] [12]
Coin dealers and individual coin collectors often use adjectives—with or without an accompanying Sheldon numerical grade—to describe an uncirculated coin's grade. The term Brilliant Uncirculated (often abbreviated as BU) is probably the most common—and the most ambiguous—of such adjectives.[13] [14] While Brilliant Uncirculated (BU) ought to refer to an uncirculated coin that retains its original mint luster, some equate BU with Uncirculated, i.e., they might refer to an MS-60 coin with little or no effulgence (brightness) as Brilliant Uncirculated. Along these lines, some numismatists argue that an unscrupulous subset of coin dealers mislead customers by using adjectival grades without defining their terms.[15] At the same time, there appears to be at least some consensus[16] [17] [18] [19] [20] [21] in the numismatic community for the following definitions.
| Uncirculated | MS-60, MS-61, MS-62 | |
| Select or Choice Uncirculated | MS-63 | |
| Choice Uncirculated | MS-63, MS-64 | |
| Gem Uncirculated | MS-65, MS-66 | |
| Superb Gem Uncirculated | MS-67, MS-68, MS-69 | |
| Perfect Uncirculated | MS-70 |
| Grade | Grade code | Description | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60 | Mint State 60 | MS60 | Unattractive, dull or washed-out, mint luster typify this coin. There may be many large detracting contact marks (bag nicks), or damage spots, but absolutely no trace of wear. There could be a heavy concentration of hairlines (minute scratches to a coin's surface), or unattractive large areas of scuff-marks. Rim nicks may be present, and eye appeal is very poor. Copper coins may be dark, dull and spotted. |
| 61 | Mint State 61 | MS61 | Mint luster may be diminished or noticeably impaired, and the surface has clusters of small contact marks throughout. Hairlines could be very noticeable. Scuff-marks may show as unattractive patches on large areas or major features. Small rim nicks, striking or planchet defects may show, and the quality may be noticeably poor. Eye appeal is unattractive. Copper pieces will be generally dull, dark and possibly spotted. |
| 62 | Mint State 62 | MS62 | Impaired or dull luster may be evident. Clusters of small marks may be present throughout with a few large marks or bag nicks in prime focal areas. Hairlines may be very noticeable. Large unattractive scuff-marks might be seen on major features. The strike, rim and planchet quality may be noticeably below average. Overall eye-appeal is generally acceptable. Copper coins will show a diminished color and tone. |
| 63 | Mint State 63 | MS63 | Mint luster may be slightly impaired. Numerous small contact marks, and a few scattered, heavy marks may be seen. Small hairlines are visible without magnification. Several detracting scuff marks or defects may be present throughout the design or in the fields. The general quality is average, but overall, the coin is rather attractive. Copper pieces may be darkened or dull. |
| 64 | Mint State 64 | MS64 | Coin has good, overall average luster and even strike for the type. Several small contact marks in groups, as well as one or two moderately heavy marks may be present. One or two small patches of hairlines may show under low, (3-4x) magnification. Noticeable, light, scuff marks or defects may be seen within the design or in the field. Attractive overall quality with a pleasing eye appeal. Copper coins may be slightly dull. |
| 65 | Mint State 65 | MS65 | Coin shows an attractive high quality of luster and strike for the date and originating mint. A few, small, scattered, contact marks, or two larger marks may be present, and one or two small patches of hairlines may show under (5x+) magnification. Noticeable, light, scuff marks may show on the highest points of the design features. Overall quality is above average and eye appeal is very pleasing. Copper coins have full luster with original or darkened color. |
| 66 | Mint State 66 | MS66 | Coin has above average quality of strike and full original mint luster, with no more than two or three minor, but noticeable, contact marks. A few very light hairlines may show under (6x+) magnification, or there may be one or two light, scuff marks showing on frosted surfaces or in the field. The eye appeal must be above average and very pleasing for the date and originating mint. Copper coins display full original or lightly toned color. |
| 67 | Mint State 67 | MS67 | Coin has a sharp strike with full, original luster, May have three or four very small contact marks and a single, more noticeable, but not detracting mark. On comparable coins, one or two small single hairlines may show under (6x+) magnification, or one or two partially hidden scuff marks or flaws may be present. Eye appeal is exceptional. Copper coins have lustrous original color. |
| 68 | Mint State 68 | MS68 | Coin has a sharp strike with full original luster, with no more than four, lightly-scattered, contact marks or flaws. No hairlines or scuff marks show. Copper coins have lustrous original color. Eye appeal is exceptional. |
| 69 | Mint State 69 | MS69 | Coin has a sharp strike with full original luster, with no more than two small non-detracting contact marks or flaws. No hairlines or scuff marks are visible. Eye appeal is exceptional. |
| 70 | Mint State 70 | MS70 | The "perfect coin", as minted. Has no trace of wear, handling, scratches or contact with other coins from a (5x) magnification. Coins in this grade are almost non-existent in older coins with very few examples known. Copper coins are bright with full original color and luster. Eye appeal is exceptional. |
See also: Proof coinage.
Like circulated grades, proof coins are graded on the Sheldon scale from 1 to 70, and are preceded by the abbreviation ‘PF’ or ‘PR’ to distinguish them from circulation strikes. Proof coins graded 60 to 70 are mirrored to those of Uncirculated grades with the difference that the coin was not made for circulation. Proof coins with the grade of PR-63 are sometimes called "Choice Proofs".[22] Proof coins that are below the grade of 60 and show signs of circulation or mishandling have been classified as Impaired Proofs, these are not included alongside circulated coins as they were never issued or intended for circulation in the first place.[23] Coins in impaired proof condition include coin patterns which accidentally found their way into circulation.
| Grade | Grade code(s) | Description | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 - 59 | Impaired Proof | PR-45 | Grades for impaired proofs mirror those for circulated grades. |
| 60 | Proof | PR, PR-60 | Grade mirrors uncirculated grade. (See chart in above section) |
| 63 | Proof | PR-63 | Grade mirrors uncirculated grade. |
| 65 | Proof | PR-65 | Grade mirrors uncirculated grade. |
| 67 | Proof | PR-67 | Grade mirrors uncirculated grade. |
| 70 | Proof | PR-70 | Grade mirrors uncirculated grade. |
The following table shows coins that have detracting features. Coin dealers will normally grade these coins at or below the ones shown for that respective type, the grades here depend on how bad the issue or issues are.[24] Grading services typically label these coins as "authentic" with x grade "details" (ex: "EF details"). Coins that are uncirculated as mentioned above can not go below an MS-60 grade.
| Type | Grade usually given | Description | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Adjustment Marks | MS66 and lower | These include mostly early coins, excess metal (such as silver and gold) was cut from overweight coins to conform to weight laws.[25] | |
| Planchet defects | MS65 and lower | Planchet defects such as die cracks or lamination are caused by flaws in a coin's metal before it was struck. Some "established planchet defects on early copper" may be more accepting by grading services.[26] | |
| Striking defects | MS64 and lower | Examples include coins that are struck off center, have porosity, color impurity, or are weakly struck. The issue or issues are dependent on severity, and the resulting grade is caused by the "reality of the market". (see entry below) | |
| Unattractive toning | MS64 and lower | Depending on conditions. Coins that have very low eye appeal will be affected as the market value of these coins cannot warrant a higher grade.[27] | |
| Carbon streaks | MS64 and lower | Carbon streaks are a flaw caused by environmental conditions. Some contributing factors include coin storage in a damp place, or exposure to cigar or cigarette smoke.[28] | |
| Fingermarks | MS63 and lower | Oils exist in human fingerprints which can leave marks on the surface of a coin. These marks are usually the result of mishandling.[29] | |
| PVC damage | MS63 and lower | Improperly stored coins in vinyl 2x2 flips, older albums, and coin holders. Green and gray streaks and/or spots appear on the surface of an affected coin.[30] | |
| Black spots | MS63 and lower | Also known as sulfur spots, these coins are given dark brown to black spots by sulfur in the environment. These black spots have also been incorrectly dubbed as carbon spots, but carbon does not contribute to oxidation.[31] | |
| Slide marks (aka "rub") | MS63 and lower | Slide marks are caused by improperly placing a coin into an album that contains plastic strip slides. The marks are given as the plastic slides or rubs across the surface of a given coin.[32] | |
| Overdipping | MS62 and lower | These coins were dipped into a dilute acid solution too many times which stripped the coin's surface of luster.[33] | |
| Cleaning marks | MS62 and lower | See: Cleaning (coinage) | |
| Corrosion spots | MS62 and lower | Copper coins can turn green, while silver coins turn black from oxidation. | |
| Wear | AU58 and lower | By definition an uncirculated coin will show no trace of wear. | |
| Whizzing | AU50 and lower | These coins were gone over with a metal or wire brush to "enhance" the uncirculated details. Whizzing causes damage and wear to the surface of a coin which lowers its grade to "circulated" status.[34] |