Shearlet Explained

In applied mathematical analysis, shearlets are a multiscale framework which allows efficient encoding of anisotropic features in multivariate problem classes. Originally, shearlets were introduced in 2006 for the analysis and sparse approximation of functions

f\inL2(\R2)

. They are a natural extension of wavelets, to accommodate the fact that multivariate functions are typically governed by anisotropic features such as edges in images, since wavelets, as isotropic objects, are not capable of capturing such phenomena.

Shearlets are constructed by parabolic scaling, shearing, and translation applied to a few generating functions. At fine scales, they are essentially supported within skinny and directional ridges following the parabolic scaling law, which reads length² ≈ width. Similar to wavelets, shearlets arise from the affine group and allow a unified treatment of the continuum and digital situation leading to faithful implementations. Although they do not constitute an orthonormal basis for

L2(\R2)

, they still form a frame allowing stable expansions of arbitrary functions

f\inL2(\R2)

.

One of the most important properties of shearlets is their ability to provide optimally sparse approximations (in the sense of optimality in) for cartoon-like functions

f

. In imaging sciences, cartoon-like functions serve as a model for anisotropic features and are compactly supported in

[0,1]2

while being

C2

apart from a closed piecewise

C2

singularity curve with bounded curvature. The decay rate of the

L2

-error of the

N

-term shearlet approximation obtained by taking the

N

largest coefficients from the shearlet expansion is in fact optimal up to a log-factor:

\|f-fN

2
\|
L2

\leqCN-2(logN)3,N\toinfty,

where the constant

C

depends only on the maximum curvature of the singularity curve and the maximum magnitudes of

f

,

f'

and

f''

. This approximation rate significantly improves the best

N

-term approximation rate of wavelets providing only

O(N-1)

for such class of functions.

Shearlets are to date the only directional representation system that provides sparse approximation of anisotropic features while providing a unified treatment of the continuum and digital realm that allows faithful implementation. Extensions of shearlet systems to

L2(\Rd),d\ge2

are also available. A comprehensive presentation of the theory and applications of shearlets can be found in.

Definition

Continuous shearlet systems

The construction of continuous shearlet systems is based on parabolic scaling matrices

Aa=\begin{bmatrix}a&0\ 0&a1/2\end{bmatrix},a>0

as a mean to change the resolution, on shear matrices

Ss=\begin{bmatrix}1&s\ 0&1\end{bmatrix},s\in\R

as a means to change the orientation, and finally on translations to change the positioning. In comparison to curvelets, shearlets use shearings instead of rotations, the advantage being that the shear operator

Ss

leaves the integer lattice invariant in case

s\in\Z

, i.e.,

Ss\Z2\subseteq\Z2.

This indeed allows a unified treatment of the continuum and digital realm, thereby guaranteeing a faithful digital implementation.

For

\psi\inL2(\R2)

the continuous shearlet system generated by

\psi

is then defined as

\operatorname{SH}cont(\psi)=\{\psia,s,t=a3/4\psi(SsAa(-t))\mida>0,s\in\R,t\in\R2\},

and the corresponding continuous shearlet transform is given by the map

f\mapstol{SH}\psif(a,s,t)=\langlef,\psia,s,t\rangle,f\inL2(\R2),(a,s,t)\in\R>0 x \R x \R2.

Discrete shearlet systems

A discrete version of shearlet systems can be directly obtained from

\operatorname{SH}cont(\psi)

by discretizing the parameter set

\R>0 x \R x \R2.

There are numerous approaches for this but the most popular one is given by

\{(2j,k,

-1
A
2j
-1
S
k

m)\midj\in\Z,k\in\Z,m\in\Z2\}\subseteq\R>0 x \R x \R2.

From this, the discrete shearlet system associated with the shearlet generator

\psi

is defined by

\operatorname{SH}(\psi)=\{\psij,k,m=23j/4\psi(Sk

A
2j

{}-m)\midj\in\Z,k\in\Z,m\in\Z2\},

and the associated discrete shearlet transform is defined by

f\mapstol{SH}\psif(j,k,m)=\langlef,\psij,k,m\rangle,f\inL2(\R2),(j,k,m)\in\Z x \Z x \Z2.

Examples

Let

\psi1\inL2(\R)

be a function satisfying the discrete Calderón condition, i.e.,

\sumj

-j
|\hat\psi
1(2

\xi)|2=1,fora.e.\xi\in\R,

with

\hat\psi1\inCinfty(\R)

and

\operatorname{supp}\hat\psi1\subseteq[-\tfrac{1}{2},-\tfrac{1}{16}]\cup[\tfrac{1}{16},\tfrac{1}{2}],

where

\hat\psi1

denotes the Fourier transform of

\psi1.

For instance, one can choose

\psi1

to be a Meyer wavelet. Furthermore, let

\psi2\inL2(\R)

be such that

\hat\psi2\inCinfty(\R),

\operatorname{supp}\hat\psi2\subseteq[-1,1]

and
1
\sum
k=-1

|\hat\psi2(\xi+k)|2=1,fora.e.\xi\in\left[-1,1\right].

One typically chooses

\hat\psi2

to be a smooth bump function. Then

\psi\inL2(\R2)

given by

\hat\psi(\xi)=\hat\psi1(\xi1)\hat\psi2\left(\tfrac{\xi2}{\xi1}\right),\xi=(\xi1,\xi2)\in\R2,

is called a classical shearlet. It can be shown that the corresponding discrete shearlet system

\operatorname{SH}(\psi)

constitutes a Parseval frame for

L2(\R2)

consisting of bandlimited functions.

Another example are compactly supported shearlet systems, where a compactly supported function

\psi\inL2(\R2)

can be chosen so that

\operatorname{SH}(\psi)

forms a frame for

L2(\R2)

. In this case, all shearlet elements in

\operatorname{SH}(\psi)

are compactly supported providing superior spatial localization compared to the classical shearlets, which are bandlimited. Although a compactly supported shearlet system does not generally form a Parseval frame, any function

f\inL2(\R2)

can be represented by the shearlet expansion due to its frame property.

Cone-adapted shearlets

One drawback of shearlets defined as above is the directional bias of shearlet elements associated with large shearing parameters.This effect is already recognizable in the frequency tiling of classical shearlets (see Figure in Section

  1. Examples
), where the frequency support of a shearlet increasingly aligns along the

\xi2

-axis as the shearing parameter

s

goes to infinity. This causes serious problems when analyzing a function whose Fourier transform is concentrated around the

\xi2

-axis.

To deal with this problem, the frequency domain is divided into a low-frequency part and two conic regions (see Figure):

\begin{align} l{R}&=\left\{(\xi1,\xi2)\in\R2\mid|\xi1|,|\xi2|\leq1\right\},\\ l{C}h&=\left\{(\xi1,\xi2)\in\R2\mid|\xi2/\xi1|\leq1,|\xi1|>1\right\},\\ l{C}v&=\left\{(\xi1,\xi2)\in\R2\mid|\xi1/\xi2|\leq1,|\xi2|>1\right\}. \end{align}

The associated cone-adapted discrete shearlet system consists of three parts, each one corresponding to one of these frequency domains.It is generated by three functions

\phi,\psi,\tilde\psi\inL2(\R2)

and a lattice sampling factor

c=(c1,c2)\in(\R>)2:

\operatorname{SH}(\phi,\psi,\tilde\psi;c)=\Phi(\phi;c1)\cup\Psi(\psi;c)\cup\tilde\Psi(\tilde\psi;c),

where

\begin{align} \Phi(\phi;c1)&=\{\phim=\phi({}-c1m)\midm\in\Z2\},\\ \Psi(\psi;c)&=\{\psij,k,m=23j/4\psi(Sk

A
2j

{}-Mcm)\midj\geq0,|k|\leq\lceil2j/2\rceil,m\in\Z2\},\\ \tilde\Psi(\tilde\psi;c)&=\{\tilde{\psi}j,k,m=23j/4\psi(\tilde{S}k

\tilde{A}
2j

{}-\tilde{M}cm)\midj\geq0,|k|\leq\lceil2j/2\rceil,m\in\Z2\}, \end{align}

with

\begin{align} &\tilde{A}a=\begin{bmatrix}a1/2&0\ 0&a\end{bmatrix},a>0,\tilde{S}s=\begin{bmatrix}1&0\s&1\end{bmatrix},s\in\R, Mc=\begin{bmatrix}c1&0\ 0&c2\end{bmatrix},and\tilde{M}c=\begin{bmatrix}c2&0\ 0&c1\end{bmatrix}. \end{align}

The systems

\Psi(\psi)

and

\tilde\Psi(\tilde\psi)

basically differ in the reversed roles of

x1

and

x2

. Thus, they correspond to the conic regions

l{C}h

and

l{C}v

, respectively. Finally, the scaling function

\phi

is associated with the low-frequency part

l{R}

.

Applications

Generalizations and extensions

\alpha

-Shearlets

See also

External links