The Shaqshaqiya sermon (Arabic: الخطبة الشقشقية||lit=roar of the camel) is a controversial text in, the best-known collection of sermons, letters, and sayings attributed to Ali ibn Abi Talib, who was the fourth Rashidun caliph, the first Shia imam, and the cousin and son-in-law of the Islamic prophet Muhammad. The sermon is highly critical of the predecessors of Ali, namely, Abu Bakr, Umar, and Uthman, accusing them of usurping the right of Ali to the caliphate.
The sermon also appears in some sources that predate, and a number of Shia authorities have furnished it with multiple chains of transmission, while other Shia scholars accept its authenticity without labeling it as, which is the highest level of credibility in the hadith terminology. By contrast, Sunni figures believe that the sermon was authored by Sharif al-Radi, the prominent Shia scholar often credited with compiling .
See also: Saqifa, Election of Uthman and Election of Ali to the caliphate.
Immediately after the death of the Islamic prophet Muhammad in 632 CE, a group of the Ansar (Medinan Muslims) met at the Saqifa and elected as his successor Abu Bakr, who was a senior companion of the prophet and his father-in-law. The accession of Abu Bakr was met with little resistance in Medina, even though the majority of the Muhajirun (Meccan Muslims) were not present at the Saqifa.
Also absent from the Saqifa were Muhammad's clan, the Banu Hashim. They and some companions of Muhammad gathered in protest in the residence of his cousin and son-in-law Ali ibn Abi Talib, whom they considered as the rightful successor of Muhammad. This soon led to a violent confrontation with Abu Bakr. According to the Shia, later also followed a violent raid on Ali's house in which his pregnant wife Fatima was badly injured and subsequently miscarried. Most likely, Ali did not pledge his allegiance to Abu Bakr until Fatima died within six months of her father Muhammad.
In contrast with the lifetime of Muhammad, Ali did not play any significant public role during the caliphates of Abu Bakr and his successors, namely, Umar, and Uthman, That there were disagreements between Ali and the first two caliphs in this period is well-documented, though they are largely downplayed or ignored in Sunni sources. By contrast, these conflicts are often emphasized in Shia sources. Their differences were epitomized during the proceedings of the council convened by Umar to elect his successor in 644, where Ali refused to be bound by the precedence of the first two caliphs. In Shia sources, Ali views the succession of Abu Bakr as a digression which paved the way for a full-blown deviation with the rebellion of Mu'awiya during his own caliphate. By contrast, he mounts only a passing resistance to the caliphate of Abu Bakr (if any at all) in often apologetic Sunni reports. Ali was also highly critical of the conduct of Uthman, and he was joined in this criticism by most senior companions. The controversial policies of Uthman eventually led to a rebellion and his assassination in 656, after which Ali was elected caliph by the Medinans and the dissidents present there.
Some experts report that Ali shows no inclination to legitimism in Sunni sources, while others point to Shia and some Sunni evidence that Ali considered the caliphate to be his right after Muhammad by virtue of his merits and his kinship with the prophet. There is some evidence that Ali further considered himself as the designated successor of Muhammad, probably a reference to Muhammad's announcement at the Ghadir Khumm. Soon after his death, however, it became clear that Ali did not enjoy popular support, which is perhaps why he resigned himself to the caliphate of Abu Bakr, likely for the sake of the unity of a nascent Islam.
In view of its sometimes sensitive content, the authenticity of has long been a subject of polemic debates, though recent academic research suggests that most of its contents can indeed be attributed to Ali by tracking the texts in sources that predate its compiler Sharif al-Radi . As for the Shaqshaqiya sermon, Sunni sources reject it as the work of al-Radi, himself a prominent Shia scholar. Their verdict is in line with the Sunni tendency to neutralize the conflicts among the companions after the death of Muhammad. By contrast, among other Shia scholars, the traditionist Abdul Hosein Amini provided several chains of transmission for this sermon, some of which predate al-Radi. Other Shia authorities accept the authenticity of the Shaqshaqiya sermon but do not claim, which is the highest level of credibility in hadith terminology. Among this last group is the Shia philosopher al-Bahrani, who also authored a commentary on . This lack of leaves the possibility that some sensitive words in the sermon were not uttered by Ali, according to the Islamic author Reza Shah-Kazemi. Alternatively, the Islamicist Husain M. Jafri suggests that the sermon is authentic for it was also quoted in works that predate, including by the Shia traditionist, by the Shia historian, and by the Mu'tazilite theologian Abu al-Qasim al-Balkhi .