Senatorial courtesy (New Jersey) explained

Senatorial courtesy is an unwritten rule practiced in the Senate of the U.S. state of New Jersey under which a State Senator can indefinitely block consideration of a nomination by the Governor of New Jersey for a gubernatorial nominee from the Senator's home county, without being required to provide an explanation. While the practice is infrequently invoked, it has brought calls for legislation that would forbid its use.[1]

Following the 1973 Democratic landslide, where Democrats won a 29–10 majority (with one independent), the newly elected Senate Democratic leadership—Senate President Frank J. Dodd (D-West Orange) and Majority Leader Matthew Feldman (D-Teaneck) moved to eliminate the Caucus System and Senatorial courtesy rules. The caucus system rule ended for good, but a faction of the Democratic majority led by Senator James P. Dugan (D-Jersey City), the incumbent Democratic State Chairman, teamed with Republican Senators to continue the practice of Senatorial courtesy.[2] In a ruling issued on December 23, 1993, the New Jersey Supreme Court upheld the use of senatorial courtesy, despite the fact that it is an unwritten rule. The vote in the Supreme Court had been 3 - 3, with Chief Justice Robert Wilentz recusing himself because he had made a statement that opposed its use in the case of Judge Murphy.[3]

In a 2014 opinion piece published in The Record, State Senator Kevin J. O'Toole (R-Essex) wrote: "Over the span of six decades, it has morphed into a tool sometimes used as a bargaining chip in bitter partisan battles." O'Toole has called for reform of the practice, saying: "Ultimately, the political desires of 40 members of the Senate should not outweigh the needs of 8 million New Jerseyans."[4]

Examples

See also

Notes and References

  1. Sullivan, Joseph F. "POLITICS; SENATORIAL COURTESY: WHAT ARE ITS LIMITS?", The New York Times, October 9, 1983. Accessed August 9, 2010.
  2. News: Sullivan. Ronald. Power of Senators Facing a New Test; Familiar Role for Feldman Confusion Is Created Senators Power Facing Test. New York Times. 20 December 1973.
  3. Gray, Jerry. "New Jersey Court Upholds 'Courtesy' Blackball", The New York Times, December 24, 1993. Accessed August 9, 2010.
  4. O'Toole, "Opinion: Now's the time to reexamine senatorial courtesy", The Record (Bergen County), August 14, 2014. Accessed December 3, 2014.
  5. News: Wright. George Cable. RICHMAN FOE GETS BID FROM MEYNER; But State Senator Refuses to Make Public Reasons for Opposing Nomination. New York Times. 6 February 1958.
  6. News: Grover C. Richman; Served in New Jersey as Attorney General . . 1983-05-07 . Walter H. . Waggoner.
  7. News: Edge. Wally. David Wildstein. The nomination nobody wanted. 3 December 2014. PolitickerNJ.com. 18 March 2010.
  8. News: Edge. Wally. How to get around senatorial courtesy. 3 December 2014. PolitickerNJ.com. 17 December 2009.
  9. Romano, Jay. "A Senate Tradition Faces Wide Attack", The New York Times, July 18, 1993. Accessed December 3, 2014.
  10. Sullivan, Joseph F. "Florio Fans Public Debate Over Senate's System of Blocking Appointments", The New York Times, May 25, 1993. Accessed July 29, 2010.
  11. Sullivan, John. "Here's One Way to Force a Meeting", The New York Times, October 24, 2004. Accessed August 9, 2010.
  12. Chen, David W. "No Compromise in Sight on Plan to Fight H.I.V.", The New York Times, June 4, 2006. Accessed August 9, 2010.
  13. Jones, Richard J. "Senator Drops Objections to Corzine Court Nominee", The New York Times, June 20, 2007. Accessed August 9, 2010.