Senate Judiciary Committee reviews of nominations to the Supreme Court of the United States explained

Since the creation of the Senate Committee on the Judiciary (Judiciary Committee) in 1816, many, but not all, nominations for the Supreme Court of the United States have been first referred to a committee for review prior to facing a confirmation vote before the full United States Senate.[1] Some nominations have been withdrawn, lapsed, or been postponed without being referred to the Judiciary Committee, while some others up until 1941 had proceeded to full Senate confirmation votes without first being reviewed by the Judiciary Committee. However, ever since 1941, all nominations have been referred to the Judiciary Committee.[1]

In the 19th century and portions of the early 20th century, Judiciary Committee reviews were brief and entailed rather cursory looks at the nominee. However, increasingly since the 1910s, the process became more rigorous. The 1916 nomination of Louis Brandeis was the first to feature public hearings on the nomination and only the second recorded instance of any form of hearings being a part of a Judiciary Committee review of a Supreme Court nomination. From after Brandeis’ 1916 hearings until the mid-1930s, it was regarded as a courtesy to spare nominees from hearings. However, after controversy arose when it was reported shortly after Hugo Black was confirmed in 1937 without much deliberation and without any hearings that he had had association with the Ku Klux Klan, this was changed and it became more common for hearings to be held and for confirmations. The first nominee to testify at hearings on their own nomination was Harlan F. Stone in 1925, but he was the only one to do so until after the controversy surrounding Hugo Black. Since Harold Hitz Burton in 1946, no nominee has proceeded to a confirmation vote without hearings, and only four nominations that have been put forth have since failed to have hearings (all four of which lapsed or were withdrawn without confirmation votes). In more recent confirmations, hearings have often lasted around four or five days.

In more recent practice, between the announcement of the nomination and the start of hearings, the Judiciary Committee undertakes an investigative stage in which committee members and their staffs prepare for the hearings by looking over the background of the nominees and relevant issues. During this stage, nominees are typically prepped by the presidential administration for the hearings, including holding grueling mock-hearings often-dubbed “murder boards”. The nominee also often pays “courtesy call” visits to the offices of individual United States Senators. The American Bar Association's Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary also usually provides their evaluation of the nominee's qualifications in this period before hearings are held.

Typically, at the end of its reviews of nominations, the Judiciary Committee has reported to the full Senate on the nomination. Often these reports have included either a positive or negative assessment of a nomination. The decision of how the Judiciary Committee reports has been conducted by a vote of its members. Historically, the Judiciary Committee had often published printed volumes outlining its members’ views. However, this has not occurred with any nominations in the 21st century.

Overview of the Judiciary Committee review process

Since 1829, many Supreme Court nominations had been referred to the Senate's Judiciary Committee. In 1868, the Senate adopted a rule that nominations needed to be referred to appropriate standing committees, which has resulted in nearly all subsequent Supreme Court nominations being referred to the Judiciary Committee.[1]

In modern practice, the Judiciary Committee assumes the main responsibility of investigating the qualifications and background of each nominee. Judiciary Committee reviews are not mentioned in the United States Constitution, but have become an important intermediary process between the nomination of a nominee by a president and a vote on the confirmation. The most recent nomination to face a confirmation vote without first being referred to the Judiciary Committee was the 1941 nomination of James F. Byrnes.[1]

From the late-1960s onwards, the Judiciary Committee's review process has nearly always consisted first of the pre-hearing investigative stage, followed by public hearings, and ending with a committee decision on what recommendation the committee should make to the full Senate.[2]

The period of time between nominations and confirmation are longer in recent decades than they once were. Before the early 1950s, the average period of time between nominations being made and votes on confirmation was 13.2 days. In contrast, for nominations spanning between the 1954 nomination of Earl Warren to the 2020 nomination of Amy Coney Barrett, the average time was 54.4 days.[3]

Pre-hearing investigative stage

In modern practice, the period between the nomination being made and the beginning of hearings is utilized by the committee as an investigative stage.[2] This period of time is, in modern practice, intended to be utilized by the committee members and their staffs to prepare for the hearings by looking over the background of the nominees and issues that are relevant to their nominations.[1] [2]

For confirmations with hearings, the amount of time that has passed between the receipt of a nomination by the Senate and the start of the first hearing has differed by nomination. The shortest time interval between these was the four days between the receipt of both the 1932 nomination of Benjamin N. Cardozo and the 1939 nomination of William O. Douglas and the beginning of hearings on those nominations. The second-shortest time interval between these occurrences was the five days between the receipt of both the 1938 nomination of Stanley F. Reed and the 1939 nomination of Felix Frankfurter and the beginning of hearings on the nominations. The longest time interval between these occurrences was the 82 days between the receipt of the 1959 nomination of Potter Stewart and the beginning of hearings on that nomination. The second-longest time interval between those occurrences was the 70 days between the receipt of the 1987 nomination of Robert Bork and the beginning of hearings on that nomination. From the 1960s onwards, the amount of time taken between the receipt of nominations and start of hearings increased over what it had tended to be prior. Prior to 1967 there was a median of only ten days between the receipt of nominations and the beginning of hearings on them. For all nominations between Thurgood Marshall's 1967 nomination and Amy Coney Barrett's 2020 nomination, the median was 27 days between the Senate's receipt of nomination and the beginning of confirmation hearings. Since the 1990s, the Judiciary Committee has typically allowed at least four weeks to elapse between the Senate's receipt of a nomination and the beginning of confirmation hearings.[1] Of the twelve confirmations held since the 1990s, the shortest period between the receipt of the nomination and the start of hearings is the 21 days between the receipt of the 2022 nomination of Ketanji Brown Jackson and the beginning of hearings on her nomination. The second-shortest period between nomination and the start of hearings of the twelve nominations since the start of the 1990s is the 28 that elapsed between the receipt of the 1990 nomination of David Souter and the start of hearings on his nomination.[1] [4]

It has become a long-standing tradition for nominees to, during this stage, pay "courtesy call" visits to individual senators at their offices, including those senators not on the Judiciary Committee. Also, in typical modern practice, during this pre-hearing stage, the American Bar Association's Standing Committee on the Federal Judiciary provides their evaluation of the nominee's qualifications.[2] The American Bar Association has provided its analysis and a recommendation on the professional qualifications to sit on the Supreme Court of every nominee since 1952.

In modern practice, during this period, the presidential administration usually helps to prepare their nominee for hearings by providing them with legal background materials and by holding mock-hearings with the nominee for practice. These mock-hearings are often called "murder boards" in reference to the grueling demand they place on the nominees.[2]

Hearings

The first recorded instance in which formal hearings are known to have been held by the Judiciary Committee (or any other committee) in regards to a Supreme Court nomination was on December 16, 1873, when the first of two closed-door hearings was held by the committee to review documents and hear relevant testimony from witnesses about a controversy that had arisen about the nomination of George Henry Williams. This controversy, pertaining to a probe into his use of Department of Justice funds for personal household expenses, had arisen after the committee had issued its initial favorable report on his nomination (approved by the committee on December 11, 1873), but the Senate voted on December 15, 1873, to recommit the nomination (sending it back to committee). There were no more recorded instances of formal committee hearings for a Supreme Court nomination until the 1916 nomination of Louis D. Brandeis, when open door hearings were held.[1] [5]

While there was only one recorded instance of a Supreme Court nomination having Judiciary Committee hearings prior to 1916, Judiciary Committee hearings have since become a regular practice for Supreme Court nominations.[5] They became increasingly prevalent between 1925 and 1946. The 1946 nomination of Harold Hitz Burton is the most recent nomination to proceed to a confirmation vote without having had formal hearings while before the Senate Judiciary Committee.[1] Since then only four nominations put forth by presidents have gone without hearings. Two of these instances (the 2005 nominations of John Roberts and Harriet Miers to the associate judgeship being vacated by the retiring Sandra Day O'Connor) saw the nominations be withdrawn before hearings could be held. Another instance was when the 1954 nomination of John Marshall Harlan II was referred to committee only to lapse without hearings. The most recent instance was when the 2016 nomination of Merrick Garland lapsed without any Senate action.[1]

The first nominee to appear before the committee themselves and testify at their own confirmation hearings was Harlan F. Stone in 1925.[1] From after Brandeis' 1916 hearings until the mid-1930s, it had been seen as a courtesy to spare nominees from hearings, particularly as nominees were often already well-regarded individuals, and because hearings were seen as being tied to the appearance of scandal. Additionally, nominees did not appear to testify in-person when hearings did occur (with the exception of Harlan F. Stone).[5] However, this began to change after the confirmation of Hugo Black in 1937.[1] [5] Black had been quickly confirmed after only five days of deliberation, and without any public hearings on the nomination. A month after his confirmation, the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette first reported that Black had been a member of the Ku Klux Klan.[5] President Franklin Roosevelt, who had nominated Black, denied having known this about him. The fact that such an individual had been speedily confirmed without the diligence of having hearings brought concern that the confirmation process was flawed.[5] Time magazine referred to this as, "the prize political scandal of the year."[6] Not too long after, in 1939, Felix Frankfurter became the second Supreme Court nominee to testify at his own confirmation hearings, and was the first to do so at the request of the Judiciary Committee and the first to do so in open session.[5] [7] [8] Frankfurter's testimony only addressed what he regarded to have been slanderous allegations raised against him.[7]

The modern questioning of nominees on their judicial views arose with the nomination hearings for John Marshall Harlan II in 1955. His nomination followed shortly after the landmark Brown v. Board of Education decision by the Supreme Court. Several senators from the Southern United States threatened to obstruct Harlan's confirmation, which persuaded Harlan to provide his testimony at hearings.[9] [10] Most nominees since Harlan have appeared before the Judiciary Committee. In the 1950s, 1960s, and part of the 1970, many hearings were perfunctorily. Few hearings saw extended questioning or comments from members of the Judiciary Committee.[8] In these decades, hearings were not lengthy either, with nominees typically only spending a few hours before the committee.[11]

During the late civil rights and post-Watergate eras, hearings began to see more substantive issues be discussed.[8] This, according to Robert Katzmann, "reflects in part the increasing importance of the Supreme Court to interest groups in the making of public policy." With this transformation have come longer confirmation hearings. In 1967, for example, Thurgood Marshall spent about seven hours in front of the committee. In 1987, Robert Bork was questioned for 30 hours over five days, with the hearings as a whole lasting for 12 days.[12] An estimated 150–300 interest groups were involved in the Bork confirmation process.[13]

Hearing for recent nominations have typically lasted four or five days. The Senate may decide to hold additional hearings if a nomination becomes controversial, an example of this being the eleven days of hearings given to the 1983 nomination of Robert Bork.[2] The first hearings to receive gavel-to-gavel television coverage was those for the 1981 nomination of Sandra Day O'Connor.[2]

Hearings tend to examine the background of the nominee, and directly question the nominee about their own work experiences, views on a variety of constitutional issues, and their general judicial philosophy.[14] [9] The hearings also tend to include testimony from various outside witnesses both in support and opposition to a nomination.[15] Among them is the American Bar Association.[16]

The table below notes the approximate number of hours that media sources estimate Supreme Court nominees since 2005 (excluding those whose nomination was withdrawn) have spent before the Senate Judiciary Committee for public testimony:

Approximate number of hours of public testimony
from Supreme Court nominees since 2005
Year Nominee Hours
2005 17[17]
2006 18[18]
2009 12+[19]
2010 17[20]
2016 0[21]
2017 20[22]
2018 32+[23]
2020 20[24]
2022 24[25]

Reports

The Judiciary Committee generally gives a report to the Senate in modern practice.[1] Typically, the committee meets in open session within a week of the end of hearings in order to determine what their report will be. Typical practice is to report even on nominations the majority of the committee opposes, in order to allow for the full Senate to make a final decision on whether to confirm or not.[2] Without an affirmative vote, a nomination cannot proceed to the floor of the Senate unless the Senate votes to discharge it from the committee. The rarely needed parliamentary procedure of discharging a nomination from committee was used to move the 2022 nomination of Ketanji Brown Jackson forward after the Judiciary Committee deadlocked along party lines in a vote on whether to give it a favorable recommendation.[26] [27]

While early reports typically did not include an assessment or recommendation, it had since become common practice for reports to.[1] The 1991 nomination of Clarence Thomas was the most recent instance in which the Judiciary Committee voted to report without a recommendation (which it did only after an earlier committee vote on whether to report positively on his nomination had failed to pass).[1] The most recent instance where no recommendation was given, however, was the 2022 confirmation of Ketanji Brown Jackson, with the aforementioned move by the Senate to vote without a Judiciary Committee recommendation after the committee deadlocked. However, unlike with Thomas' nomination, the move to advance from committee review to full-Senate consideration of the confirmation without a recommendation was not made by a vote of the Judiciary Committee, but rather by a vote of the full Senate.[27]

Seven nominations have received negative committee report (either an “unfavorable” recommendation, an “adverse” report, or a report featuring a “recommendation not to act”). The only two instances in which the Senate has confirmed a nominee that had received a negative committee report were the nominations of Stanley Matthews in 1881 and Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar in 1888. The most recent instance in which the committee gave a nomination a negative report was the 1987 nomination of Robert Bork, whose nomination was rejected by the Senate.[1]

Only six nominations that have received favorable committee reports have failed to result in a confirmation.[1]

While, previously, the Senate Judiciary Committee regularly provided printed committee reports, from the 2005 nomination of John Roberts onwards, nominations have gone without one. Printed reports were prepared behind closed doors after the committee had held their vote and provided a single volume outlining the views of committee members on the nomination as well as supplemental minority or additional views.[2]

Judiciary Committee chairs

The Judiciary Committee is led by a chair.

Two Judiciary Committee chairs (Martin Van Buren and Joe Biden) would subsequently serve as president of the United States. Both put forward nominations to the Supreme Court during their presidencies. However, of the two, only Biden had any nominations referred to the Judiciary Committee during his tenure as its chair.[1]

One Judiciary Committee chair, John J. Crittenden, was subsequently nominated to the Supreme Court. Crittenden was not confirmed, however, as his nomination lapsed after a recommendation from the Judiciary Committee that the Senate not act on the nomination. During Crittenden's tenure as Judiciary Committee chair, no nominations were recorded as having been formally reviewed by the committee. In fact, his own subsequent nomination is the first recorded instance of the committee receiving a nomination for review.[1]

Below is a table listing chairs of the Senate Judiciary Committee, with the number of nominations that were referred to the committee during their tenure(s) as chair:

Chairs of the Senate Judiciary Committee
Name Party Tenure Total number of
nominations
referred to
Judiciary
Committee
during tenure
Cumulative
total for
all tenures
1816–1817 style=text-align:center0 style=text-align:center0
1817–1818 style=text-align:center0 style=text-align:center0
1818–1819 style=text-align:center0 style=text-align:center0
1819–1823 style=text-align:center0 style=text-align:center0
1823–1828 style=text-align:center0 style=text-align:center0

(first tenure)
1829–1831 style=text-align:center0 style=text-align:center7
1829–1831 style=text-align:center1 style=text-align:center1
1831–1832 style=text-align:center0 style=text-align:center0
1832–1833 style=text-align:center0 style=text-align:center0
1833–1836 style=text-align:center1 style=text-align:center1
1836–1838 style=text-align:center5 style=text-align:center5
1838–1841 style=text-align:center0 style=text-align:center0

(second tenure)
1841–1845 style=text-align:center7 style=text-align:center7
1845–1847 style=text-align:center3 style=text-align:center3
1847–1857 style=text-align:center4 style=text-align:center4
1857–1861 style=text-align:center1 style=text-align:center1
1861–1872 style=text-align:center8 style=text-align:center8
1872 style=text-align:center0 style=text-align:center0

(first tenure)
1872–1879 style=text-align:center4 style=text-align:center12
1879–1881 style=text-align:center2 style=text-align:center2

(second tenure)
1881–1891 style=text-align:center8 style=text-align:center12

(first tenure)
1891–1893 style=text-align:center2 style=text-align:center6
1893–1895 style=text-align:center3 style=text-align:center3

(second tenure)
1895–1904 style=text-align:center4 style=text-align:center6
1904–1905 style=text-align:center0 style=text-align:center0
1905–1912 style=text-align:center6 style=text-align:center6
1912–1919 style=text-align:center3 style=text-align:center3
1919–1923 style=text-align:center3 style=text-align:center3
1923–1924 style=text-align:center0 style=text-align:center0
1924–1926 style=text-align:center1 style=text-align:center1
1926–1933 style=text-align:center4 style=text-align:center4
1933–1941 style=text-align:center5 style=text-align:center5
1941–1945 style=text-align:center3 style=text-align:center3

(first tenure)
1945–1947 style=text-align:center2 style=text-align:center4
1947–1949 style=text-align:center0 style=text-align:center0

(second tenure)
1949–1953 style=text-align:center2 style=text-align:center4
1953–1955 style=text-align:center3 style=text-align:center3
1955–1956 style=text-align:center1 style=text-align:center1
1956–1978 style=text-align:center16 style=text-align:center16
1978–1981 style=text-align:center0 style=text-align:center0
1981–1987 style=text-align:center3 style=text-align:center3
1987–1995 style=text-align:center6 style=text-align:center6

(first tenure)
1995–2001 style=text-align:center0 style=text-align:center0

(first tenure)
2001 style=text-align:center0 style=text-align:center2

(second tenure)
2001 style=text-align:center0 style=text-align:center0

(second tenure)
2001–2003 style=text-align:center0 style=text-align:center2

(third tenure)
2003–2005 style=text-align:center0 style=text-align:center0
2005–2007 style=text-align:center4 style=text-align:center4

(third tenure)
2007–2015 style=text-align:center2 style=text-align:center2
2015–2019 style=text-align:center3 style=text-align:center3
2019–2021 style=text-align:center1 style=text-align:center1
2021–presentstyle=text-align:center1 style=text-align:center1
General sources:

List of Judiciary Committee actions

The following is a list of Senate Judiciary Committee actions on nominations for the Supreme Court of the United States. Excluded from this list are nominations for which there either was no committee referral or for which no record exists of any committee referral.

President Party Committee chair Public hearing date(s) Final vote date Final vote
No record of hearing Reported with recommendation not to act data-sort-value="Postponed" bgcolor="#c0c0c0" Postponed by Senate (23–17) on February 12, 1829
No record of hearing Reported data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on January 9, 1835
(second nomination) No record of hearing Reported data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (29–15) on March 15, 1836
No record of hearing Reported data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (30–11) on March 15, 1836
No record of hearing Reported data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (23–18) on March 8, 1937
No record of hearing Reported data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (28–15) on March 8, 1937
No record of hearing Reported data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on September 25, 1837
None No record of hearing Reported data-sort-value="Rejected" bgcolor="#c0c0c0"Rejected by Senate (21–26) on January 31, 1844
No record of hearing Reported data-sort-value="Withdrawn" bgcolor="#c0c0c0"Tabled (postponed) by Senate on June 15, 1844 (27–20); nomination withdrawn on June 17, 1844
No record of hearing Reported data-sort-value="Postponed" bgcolor="#c0c0c0" Tabled (postponed) by Senate on June 15, 1844 (29–18)
No record of hearing Reported data-sort-value="Withdrawn" bgcolor="#c0c0c0" Tabled (postponed) by Senate on January 21, 1845; nomination withdrawn on February 6, 1845
No record of hearing Reported data-sort-value="Withdrawn" bgcolor="#c0c0c0" Tabled (postponed) by Senate on January 21, 1845; nomination withdrawn on February 8, 1845
No record of hearing Reported data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on February 14, 1845
No record of hearing Reported Lapsed
No record of hearing Reported data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on January 3, 1846
No record of hearing Reported data-sort-value="Rejected" bgcolor="#c0c0c0"Rejected by Senate (20–29) on January 22, 1846
No record of hearing Reported data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on August 4, 1846
No record of hearing Reported data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on December 23, 1851
No record of hearing Reported data-sort-value="lapsed" bgcolor="#c0c0c0" Tabled by Senate; lapsed
No record of hearing style=text-align:center data-sort-value=1853-02-24N/A data-sort-value="none"On February 24, 1853 (the same day the Senate referred the nomination to committee), the Senate ordered the committee to discharge the nomination Lapsed
No record of hearing Reported data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on March 22, 1853
No record of hearing Reported data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (26–23) on January 12, 1858
No record of hearing Reported data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (38–1) on January 24, 1862
No record of hearing Reported data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on December 8, 1862
No record of hearing Reported data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on March 10, 1863
No record of hearing data-sort-value=1866 style=text-align:centerN/A data-sort-value=noneReferred to Judiciary Committee on April 16, 1866, but no record exists of any committee vote data-sort-value="Lapsed" bgcolor="#c0c0c0"Lapsed
No record of hearing Reported adversely data-sort-value="Rejected" bgcolor="#c0c0c0"Rejected by Senate (24–33) on February 3, 1870
No record of hearing Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on February 18, 1870
No record of hearing Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (46–9) on March 21, 1870
No record of hearing Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on December 11, 1872
No record of hearing Reported favorably Recommitted (returned to the committee) on December 15, 1873; nomination withdrawn on January 8, 1874
data-sort-value=1873-12-16Closed hearings on Dec 16 and 17, 1873 N/A
No record of hearing Reported favorably data-sort-value="Withdrawn" bgcolor="#c0c0c0"Nomination withdrawn on January 13, 1874
No record of hearing Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (63–0) on January 21, 1874
No record of hearing Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on November 29, 1877
No record of hearing Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (39–8) on December 21, 1880
No record of hearing data-sort-value="Reported"Considered Lapsed
No record of hearing Postponed
No record of hearing Reported adversely (6–1) data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (24–23) on May 12, 1881
Split No record of hearing Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (51–5) on December 20, 1881
No record of hearing Reported favorably data-sort-value="Declined" bgcolor="#f8f8f1"Confirmed (39–12) on March 2, 1882
No record of hearing Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on March 22, 1882
No record of hearing Reported adversely (5–4) data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (32–28) on January 16, 1888
No record of hearing data-sort-value="Reported"Reported without recommendation data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (41–20) on July 20, 1888
No record of hearing Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (53–11) on December 18, 1889
No record of hearing Reported favorablydata-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on December 29, 1890
No record of hearing Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on July 26, 1892
No record of hearing Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on February 18, 1893
No record of hearing data-sort-value="Reported"Considered Lapsed
No record of hearing data-sort-value="Reported"Considered Rejected (24–30) on January 15, 1894
No record of hearing Reported adversely
No record of hearing data-sort-value="Reported"Committee divided (5–5) in vote on question of reporting favorability; ultimately reported without recommendation data-sort-value="Rejected" bgcolor="#c0c0c0"Rejected (32–41) on February 16, 1894
No record of hearing Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on December 9, 1895
No record of hearing Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on January 21, 1898
No record of hearing Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on December 4, 1902
No record of hearing Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on February 23, 1903
No record of hearing Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on December 12, 1906
No record of hearing Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on December 20, 1909
No record of hearing Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on May 2, 1910
No record of hearing Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on December 15, 1910
No record of hearing Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on December 15, 1910
No record of hearing Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (50–26) on March 13, 1912
No record of hearing Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (44–6) on August 29, 1914
data-sort-value="1916-02-09"Feb. 9–10, 1916;
Feb. 15–18, 1916;
Feb. 24–26, 1916;
Feb. 29 – March 4, 1916;
March 6–8, 1916;
March 14–15, 1916
Reported favorably (10–8) data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (47–22) on June 1, 1916
No record of hearing Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on July 24, 1916
No record of hearing Reported favorably Lapsed
data-sort-value="1922-12-12"Closed hearings held on Dec 12 and 13, 1922 Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Motion to recommit defeated (7–63) on December 21, 1922; confirmed (61–8) on December 21, 1922
No record of hearing Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on January 29, 1923
data-sort-value="1925-01-12"Closed hearing held on January 12, 1925 Reported favorably Recommitted (returned to committee) on January 26, 1925;
confirmed (71–6) on February 5, 1925
data-sort-value="1925-01-28"Closed hearing held on January 28, 1925 Reported favorably
No record of hearing data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably (10–2) data-sort-value="Confirmed"Motion to recommit defeated (3–49) on February 13, 1930; confirmed (52–26) on February 13, 1930
data-sort-value="1930-04-05"April 5, 1930 Reported adversely data-sort-value="Rejected" bgcolor="#c0c0c0" Rejected (39–41) on May 7, 1930
No record of hearing Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on May 20, 1930
data-sort-value="1932-02-19"February 19, 1932 Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on February 24, 1932
No record of hearing data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably (13–4) data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (63–16) on August 17, 1937
data-sort-value="1938-01-20"January 20, 1938 Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on January 25, 1938
data-sort-value="1939-01-10"Jan. 10–12, 1939 Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on January 17, 1939
data-sort-value="1939-03-24"March 24, 1939 Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (62–4) on April 4, 1939
data-sort-value="1940-01-11"January 11, 1940 Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on January 16, 1940
data-sort-value="1941-06-21"June 21, 1941Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on June 27, 1941
data-sort-value="1941-06-21"June 21, 1941;
June 23, 1941;
June 27, 1941;
June 30, 1941
Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on July 7, 1941
data-sort-value="1943-01-22"January 22, 1943 Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on February 8, 1943
No record of hearing Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on September 19, 1945
data-sort-value="1946-06-14"June 14, 1946 Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on June 20, 1946
data-sort-value="1949-08-09"Aug. 9–11, 1949 Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (73–8) on August 18, 1949
data-sort-value="1949-09-27"September 27, 1949 data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably (9–2) data-sort-value="Confirmed"Motion to recommit defeated on October 4, 1949; confirmed (48–16) on October 4, 1949
data-sort-value="1954-02-02"February 2, 1954;
February 19, 1954
data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably (12–3) data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on March 1, 1954
No hearing held N/A data-sort-value=noneReferred to Judiciary Committee on September 9, 1945, but no record exists of any committee vote Lapsed
data-sort-value="1955-02-25"February 25, 1955 data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably (10–4) data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (71–11) on March 16, 1955
nowrap data-sort-value="1957-02-26"Feb 26 and 27, 1957 Reported favorablydata-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on March 19, 1957
data-sort-value="1957-03-18"March 18, 1957 Reported favorablydata-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by voice vote on March 19, 1957
data-sort-value="1959-04-09"Apr 9 and 14, 1959 data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably (12–3) data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (70–17) on May 5, 1959
data-sort-value="1962-04-11"April 11, 1962 data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by unanimous consent on April 11, 1962
data-sort-value="1962-09-11"Sep 11 and 13, 1962 data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by unanimous consent on September 25, 1962
data-sort-value="1965-08-05"August 5, 1965 data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed by unanimous consent on August 11, 1965
data-sort-value="1967-07-13"July 13, 14, 18, 19 and 24, 1967 data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably (11–5) data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (69–11) on August 30, 1967
data-sort-value="1968-07-11"Jul 11 and 12, 1968;
Jul. 16–20, 1968;
Jul 22 and 23, 1968;
September 13, 1968
September 16, 1968
data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably (11–6) data-sort-value="withdrawn" bgcolor="#c0c0c0" Cloture motion rejected (45–43) on October 1, 1968; nomination withdrawn on October 2, 1968
data-sort-value="1968-07-11"Jul 11 and 12, 1968;
Jul. 16–20, 1968;
Jul 22 and 23, 1968;
September 13, 1968
September 16, 1968
data-sort-value="n/a"N/A data-sort-value=noneNo committee vote taken data-sort-value="withdrawn" bgcolor="#c0c0c0" Nomination withdrawn on October 2, 1968
data-sort-value="1969-06-03"June 3, 1969 data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (74–3) on June 9, 1969
data-sort-value="1969-09-16"Sep. 16–19, 1969;
Sep. 23–26, 1969
data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably (10–7) data-sort-value="Rejected" bgcolor="#c0c0c0"Rejected (45–55) on November 21, 1969
data-sort-value="1970-01-27"Jan. 7–9, 1970;
Feb 2 and 3, 1970
data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably (13–4) data-sort-value="Rejected" bgcolor="#c0c0c0"Rejected (45–51) on April 8, 1970
data-sort-value="1970-04-29"April 29, 1970 data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably (17–0) data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (94–0) on May 12, 1970
data-sort-value="1971-11-03"Nov 3 and 4, 1971;
Nov. 8–10, 1971
data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably (17–0)data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (89–1) on December 6, 1971
data-sort-value="1971-11-03"Nov 3 and 4, 1971;
Nov. 8–10, 1971
data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably (12–4)data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (68–26) on December 10, 1971
data-sort-value="1975-12-08"Dec. 8–10, 1975data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably (13–0) data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (98–0) on December 17, 1975
data-sort-value="1981-09-09"Sep. 9–11, 1981data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably (17–1)data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (99–0) on September 21, 1981
data-sort-value="1986-07-29"Jul. 29 – August 1, 1986 data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably (13–5)data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (65–33) on September 17, 1986
data-sort-value="1986-08-05"Aug 5 and 6, 1986 data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably (18–0)data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (98–0) on September 17, 1986
data-sort-value="1987-09-15"Sep. 15–19, 1987;
Sep. 21–23, 1987;
September 25, 1987;
Sep. 29–30, 1987
Motion to report favorably rejected (5–9); reported unfavorably (9–5) data-sort-value="Rejected" bgcolor="#c0c0c0"Rejected (42–58) on October 23, 1987
data-sort-value="1987-11-30"Dec. 14–16, 1987 data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably (14–0)data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (97–0) on February 3, 1988
data-sort-value="1990-09-13"Sep 13 and 14, 1990;
Sep. 17–19, 1990
data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably (13–1)data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (90–9) on October 2, 1990
data-sort-value="1991-07-08"Sep. 10–13, 1991;
Sep. 16–17, 1991;
Sep 19 and 20, 1991;
Oct. 11–13, 1991
data-sort-value="Reported"Motion to report favorably failed (7–7); reported without recommendation (13–1) data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (52–48) on October 15, 1991
data-sort-value="1993-07-20"Jul, 20–23, 1993 data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably (18–0)data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (96–3) on August 3, 1993
data-sort-value="1990-09-13"Jul. 12–15, 1994 data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably (18–0)data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (87–9) on July 29, 1994
No hearing held style=text-align:center data-sort-value=2005-07-29N/A data-sort-value=noneNomination referred to Judiciary Committee on July 29, 2005. No committee vote taken. data-sort-value="Withdrawn" bgcolor="#c0c0c0"Nomination withdrawn on September 6, 2005
data-sort-value="2005-09-12"Sep. 12–15, 2005 data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably (13–5)data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (78–22) on September 29, 2005
No hearing held style=text-align:center data-sort-value=2005-07-29N/A data-sort-value=noneNomination referred to Judiciary Committee on October 7, 2005. No committee vote taken. data-sort-value="Withdrawn" bgcolor="#c0c0c0"Nomination withdrawn on October 28, 2005
data-sort-value="2006-01-09"Jan. 9–13, 2006 data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably (10–8)data-sort-value="Confirmed"
data-sort-value="2009-07-13"Jul. 13–16, 2009 data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably (13–6)data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (68–31) on August 6, 2009
data-sort-value="2010-05-10"Jun. 28 – Jul 1, 2010data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably (13–6)data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (63–37) on August 5, 2010
No hearing held style=text-align:center data-sort-value=2016-03-16N/A data-sort-value=noneNomination referred to Judiciary Committee on March 16, 2016. No committee vote taken. Lapsed
data-sort-value="2017-03-20"Mar. 20–23, 2017 data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably (11–9) data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (54–45) on April 7, 2017
data-sort-value="2017-03-20"Sep. 4–7, 2018;
September 27, 2018
data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably (11–9) data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (50–48) on October 6, 2018
data-sort-value="2020-10-12"Oct. 12–15, 2020 data-sort-value="Reported favorably" style="background: PaleGreen; color: black"Reported favorably (12–0) data-sort-value="Confirmed"Confirmed (52–48) on October 26, 2020
[29] [30] data-sort-value="2022-04-03"April 3, 2022 data-sort-value="deadlocked"Motion to report favorably deadlocked (11–11), thus failing.[31] Senate subsequently voted 53–47 on April 4, 2022, to discharge the nomination from committee[32] Confirmed 53–47 on April 7, 2022
General sources:[33] [34]

Motions to refer nominations to the Judiciary Committee

Several times the Senate has held votes on whether to have the Judiciary Committee review a nomination.

Motions to recommit

Several votes have been held on whether to return a nomination to committee for further review.

Cite
President Party of President Date of vote Outcome "Yea" votes "Nay" votes Majority party Vote by party
Total % Total % Other Parties
Total "yaes" Total "nays" Total "yaes" Total "nays" Party name Total "yaes" Total "nays"
Recommitted Voice vote
Motion defeated 7 10.00% 63 90.00%
Recommitted Voice vote [35]
Motion defeated 31 38.75% 49 61.25% 19 11 12 38 0 0 [36]
Motion defeated 1518.52% 66 81.48% 6 59 9 5 0 1 [37]
0 1
Independents0 0
Motion defeated 21 27.63% 45 59.21% 2 36 19 9 [38]
General source:

Other motions

The 1826 nomination of Robert Trimble by John Quincy Adams saw a successful effort to first refer the nomination to the Judiciary Committee, with the Senate voting to reject the motion to do so. The Senate defeated a motion to refer this nomination to the Judiciary Committee by a 7–25 vote on May 9, 1826. The Senate confirmed the nomination later that day.[1]

Nominations that were not referred to the Judiciary Committee

The following outlines United States Supreme Court nominations that were not referred to the Judiciary Committee

Nominations predating the creation of the Judiciary Committee

List of nominations predating the creation of the Judiciary Committee
President Party
None data-sort-value="Confirmed" bgcolor=white Confirmed by voice vote on September 26, 1789
data-sort-value="Confirmed" bgcolor=white Confirmed by voice vote September 26, 1789
data-sort-value="Confirmed" bgcolor=white Confirmed by voice vote on September 26, 1789
data-sort-value="Confirmed" bgcolor=white Confirmed by voice vote on September 26, 1789
data-sort-value="Confirmed" bgcolor=white Confirmed by voice vote on September 26, 1789
data-sort-value="Declined" bgcolor="#f8f8f1" Confirmed by voice vote on September 26, 1789
data-sort-value="Confirmed" bgcolor=white Confirmed by voice vote on February 10, 1790
data-sort-value="Confirmed" bgcolor=white Confirmed by voice vote on November 7, 1791
data-sort-value="Withdrawn" bgcolor="#c0c0c0" Nomination withdrawn on February 28, 1793
data-sort-value="Confirmed" bgcolor="#ffffff" Confirmed by voice vote on March 4, 1793
data-sort-value="Rejected" bgcolor="#c0c0c0" Rejected (10–14) on December 15, 1795[39]
data-sort-value="Declined" bgcolor="#f8f8f1" Confirmed by voice vote on January 27, 1796
data-sort-value="Confirmed" bgcolor="#ffffff" Confirmed by voice vote on January 27, 1796
data-sort-value="Confirmed" bgcolor="#ffffff" Confirmed (21–1) on March 4, 1796[40]
data-sort-value="Confirmed" bgcolor="#ffffff" Confirmed by voice vote on December 20, 1798
data-sort-value="Confirmed" bgcolor="#ffffff" Confirmed by voice vote on December 10, 1799
data-sort-value="Declined" bgcolor="#f8f8f1" Confirmed by voice vote on December 19, 1800
data-sort-value="Confirmed" bgcolor="#ffffff" Confirmed by voice vote on January 27, 1801
data-sort-value="Confirmed" bgcolor="#ffffff" Confirmed by voice vote on March 24, 1804
data-sort-value="Confirmed" bgcolor="#ffffff" Confirmed by voice vote on December 17, 1806
data-sort-value="Confirmed" bgcolor="#ffffff" Confirmed by voice vote on March 2, 1807
data-sort-value="Declined" bgcolor="#f8f8f1" Confirmed by voice vote on January 3, 1811
data-sort-value="Rejected" bgcolor="#c0c0c0" Rejected (9–24) on February 13, 1811[41]
data-sort-value="Declined" bgcolor="#f8f8f1" Confirmed by voice vote on February 22, 1811
data-sort-value="Confirmed" bgcolor="#ffffff" Confirmed by voice vote on November 18, 1811
data-sort-value="Confirmed" bgcolor="#ffffff" Confirmed by voice vote on November 18, 1811
General sources:

After the creation of the Judiciary Committee

List of nominations that were not referred to the Judiciary Committee
President Party
data-sort-value="Confirmed" bgcolor="#ffffff" Confirmed by voice vote on December 9, 1823
data-sort-value="Confirmed" bgcolor="#ffffff" Confirmed (27–5) on May 9, 1826
data-sort-value="Confirmed" bgcolor="#ffffff" Confirmed by voice vote on March 7, 1829
data-sort-value="Confirmed" bgcolor="#ffffff"Confirmed (41–2) on January 6, 1830[42]
(first nomination) Postponed (23–22) on March 3, 1835[43]
data-sort-value="Confirmed" bgcolor="#ffffff" Confirmed (25–5) on March 2, 1841[44]
Postponed (26–15) on February 11, 1853[45]
Lapsed
data-sort-value="Confirmed" bgcolor="#ffffff" Confirmed by voice vote on July 16, 1862
data-sort-value="Confirmed" bgcolor="#ffffff" Confirmed by voice vote on December 6, 1864
data-sort-value="Died" bgcolor="#f8f8f1" Confirmed (46–11) by voice vote on December 20, 1869[46]
data-sort-value="Confirmed" bgcolor="#ffffff" Confirmed by voice vote on February 19, 1894
Confirmed by voice vote on December 12, 1910
data-sort-value="Confirmed" bgcolor="#ffffff" Confirmed by voice vote on June 30, 1921
data-sort-value="Confirmed" bgcolor="#ffffff" Confirmed by voice vote on September 5, 1922
data-sort-value="Confirmed" bgcolor="#ffffff" Confirmed by voice vote on June 12, 1941
General sources:

Notes and References

  1. Web site: McMillion. Barry J.. Rutkus. Denis Steven. July 6, 2018. Supreme Court Nominations, 1789 to 2017: Actions by the Senate, the Judiciary Committee, and the President. Congressional Research Service. Washington, D.C.. March 9, 2022.
  2. Web site: Supreme Court Appointment Process: Consideration by the Senate Judiciary Committee . crsreports.congress.gov . Congressional Research Service . April 21, 2022 . February 22, 2021.
  3. Web site: DeSilver . Drew . Up until the postwar era, U.S. Supreme Court confirmations usually were routine business . Pew Research Center . April 21, 2022 . February 7, 2022.
  4. Press Release: Nominations Sent to the Senate . February 28, 2022 . The White House . Washington, D.C. .
  5. Web site: Waxman . Olivia B. . Supreme Court Confirmation Hearings Weren't Always Such a Spectacle. There's a Reason That Changed . Yahoo! News . April 18, 2022 . September 6, 2018.
  6. The Time Vault: September 27, 1937 . Time . April 18, 2022 . September 27, 1937.
  7. News: A guide to the Supreme Court nomination. https://web.archive.org/web/20210120011145/https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna6694744. dead. January 20, 2021. Tom. Curry. November 5, 2005. NBC News. March 20, 2022.
  8. Web site: Early Supreme Court hearings little resembled their modern counterparts. March 13, 2017. Scott. Bomboy. Constitution Daily. National Constitution Center. Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. March 20, 2022.
  9. News: Let the Nominee Stay Home. Carter. Stephen L.. May 9, 2009. The New York Times. May 14, 2019.
  10. Web site: About Judicial Nominations: Historical Overview. United States Senate. Washington, D.C.. March 13, 2022.
  11. News: Republicans Speak of Respect of Roberts's Peers, and Democrats Issue Warnings. The New York Times. September 16, 2005. April 9, 2022.
  12. Book: Katzmann, Robert A.. Courts and Congress. Robert A. Katzmann. 1997. Brookings Institution Press. Washington, D.C.. 0-8157-4866-3. 18. April 9, 2022.
  13. Frank. Guliuzza III. Daniel J.. Reagan. David M.. Barrett. Character, Competency, and Constitutionalism: Did the Bork Nomination Represent a Fundamental Shift in Confirmation Criteria?. 75. 2. 1992. 409–437. Marquette Law Review. March 16, 2022.
  14. News: What is the process for Supreme Court nominations? Here's what's next and how long it could take. Rick. Rouan. January 26, 2022. USA Today. March 13, 2022.
  15. Supreme Court Appointment Process: Consideration by the Senate Judiciary Committee. McMillion. Barry J.. February 22, 2021. Congressional Research Service. Washington, D.C.. March 7, 2022.
  16. Web site: How Do Supreme Court Nominations Work?. Josephine (Jo). Bahn. After the Bar: Essentials. American Bar Association.
  17. News: Kenneth. Jost. Roberts' Confirmation Hearings Conclude. September 15, 2005. NPR. April 9, 2022.
  18. News: Liptak . Adam . Few Glimmers of How Conservative Judge Alito Is . October 15, 2020 . The New York Times . January 13, 2006.
  19. News: Sotomayor ends Senate testimony . July 16, 2009 . . AP. June 25, 2022.
  20. News: Doyle . Michael . Lightman . David . Kagan hearings delivered a little something for everyone . July 3, 2010 . June 25, 2022 . The Seattle Times.
  21. The History of 'Stolen' Supreme Court Seats. Erick. Trickey. March 20, 2017. September 25, 2020. Smithsonian. March 10, 2022.
  22. News: Flegenheimer. Matt. Liptak. Adam. Savage. Charlie. Hulse. Carl. Gorsuch Completes His 20-Hour Test. So how did he do?. March 23, 2017. The New York Times. April 9, 2022.
  23. Paschal. Olivia. Carlisle. Madeleine. The 17 Most Striking Moments From the Kavanaugh Hearing. September 27, 2018. The Atlantic. April 9, 2022.
  24. News: Walsh. Deirdre. October 15, 2020. Takeaways From Amy Coney Barrett's Judiciary Confirmation Hearings. NPR. April 5, 2022.
  25. News: Ketanji Brown Jackson confirmed to the Supreme Court. Gary. Martin. April 7, 2022. Las Vegas Review-Journal. April 9, 2022.
  26. News: Senate forces Jackson nomination out of committee with bipartisan vote. Cathey. Libby. April 4, 2022. ABC News. April 7, 2022.
  27. Web site: Hayes . Mike . Live updates: Jackson nomination advances after Senate committee deadlocks . CNN . April 18, 2022 . en . April 4, 2022.
  28. Web site: Party Division. Office of the Secretary, United States Senate. Washington, D.C.. May 14, 2019.
  29. Web site: Sneed . Tierney . Chowdhury . Maureen . Macaya . Melissa . Berman . Dan . Ketanji Brown Jackson's confirmation hearing: Day 1 . CNN . April 18, 2022 . March 21, 2022.
  30. News: Wagner . John . Wang . Amy B. . Alfaro . Mariana . Scott . Eugene . Sonmez . Felicia . Confirmation hearings for Jackson conclude after testimony from outside witnesses . Washington Post . April 18, 2022 . en . March 24, 2022.
  31. Web site: Durkee . Alison . Ketanji Brown Jackson Supreme Court Vote Deadlocks In Senate Committee—Here's Why She'll Still Be Confirmed . Forbes . April 18, 2022 . en.
  32. News: April 4, 2022 . Collins, Murkowski, Romney help break deadlock on Jackson's nomination . en-US . The Hill . April 4, 2022.
  33. Web site: Previous Committee Chairmen United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary . www.judiciary.senate.gov . United States Senate Committee on the Judiciary . March 4, 2022 . en.
  34. Web site: Capps . Meredith . Research Guides: Supreme Court Nominations and Background Information from ProQuest: Nomination Hearings . researchguides.library.vanderbilt.edu . Vanderbilt University . October 28, 2022 . en . December 22, 2021.
  35. Web site: SENATE IN SECRET SENDS STONE'S NAME BACK TO COMMITTEE; Motion Is Made by Wheeler After a Conference at the White House. COMMITTEE TO HEAR STONE Attorney General Is Expected to Explain His New Move to Reindict Senator. DELAY ACTION ON WARREN Senators Wrangle in Executive Session Over "Leaks" of Proceedings Behind Closed Doors. SENDS STONE'S NAME BACK TO COMMITTEE . The New York Times . March 13, 2022 . January 27, 1925.
  36. Web site: TO RECOMMIT TO THE COMMITTEE ON THE JUDICIARY THE NOMINATION … -- Senate Vote #174 -- Feb 13, 1930 . GovTrack.us . March 13, 2022 . en.
  37. Web site: TO RECOMMIT THE NOMINATION OF HUGO BLACK TO THE SUPREME … -- Senate Vote #70 -- Aug 17, 1937 . GovTrack.us . March 13, 2022 . en.
  38. Web site: NOMINATION OF JUDGE SHERMAN MINTON TO BE ASSOC. JUDGE OF … -- Senate Vote #207 -- Oct 4, 1949 . GovTrack.us . March 13, 2022 . en.
  39. .
  40. .
  41. .
  42. .
  43. .
  44. .
  45. .
  46. .