Selection theorem explained

In functional analysis, a branch of mathematics, a selection theorem is a theorem that guarantees the existence of a single-valued selection function from a given set-valued map. There are various selection theorems, and they are important in the theories of differential inclusions, optimal control, and mathematical economics.[1]

Preliminaries

Given two sets X and Y, let F be a set-valued function from X and Y. Equivalently,

F:Xl{P}(Y)

is a function from X to the power set of Y.

A function

f:XY

is said to be a selection of F if

\forallx\inX:f(x)\inF(x).

In other words, given an input x for which the original function F returns multiple values, the new function f returns a single value. This is a special case of a choice function.

The axiom of choice implies that a selection function always exists; however, it is often important that the selection have some "nice" properties, such as continuity or measurability. This is where the selection theorems come into action: they guarantee that, if F satisfies certain properties, then it has a selection f that is continuous or has other desirable properties.

Selection theorems for set-valued functions

The Michael selection theorem[2] says that the following conditions are sufficient for the existence of a continuous selection:

The approximate selection theorem[3] states the following:

Suppose X is a compact metric space, Y a non-empty compact, convex subset of a normed vector space, and Φ: X →

lP(Y)

a multifunction all of whose values are compact and convex. If graph(Φ) is closed, then for every ε > 0 there exists a continuous function f : XY with graph(f) ⊂ [graph(Φ)]ε.
Here,

[S]\varepsilon

denotes the

\varepsilon

-dilation of

S

, that is, the union of radius-

\varepsilon

open balls centered on points in

S

. The theorem implies the existence of a continuous approximate selection.

Another set of sufficient conditions for the existence of a continuous approximate selection is given by the Deutsch–Kenderov theorem,[4] whose conditions are more general than those of Michael's theorem (and thus the selection is only approximate):

V

of

0

there exists a neighborhood

U

of

x

such that

In a later note, Xu proved that the Deutsch–Kenderov theorem is also valid if

Y

is a locally convex topological vector space.[5]

The Yannelis-Prabhakar selection theorem[6] says that the following conditions are sufficient for the existence of a continuous selection:

The Kuratowski and Ryll-Nardzewski measurable selection theorem says that if X is a Polish space and

lB

its Borel σ-algebra,

Cl(X)

is the set of nonempty closed subsets of X,

(\Omega,lF)

is a measurable space, and

F:\Omega\toCl(X)

is an measurable map (that is, for every open subset

U\subseteqX

we have then

F

has a selection that is [7]

Other selection theorems for set-valued functions include:

Selection theorems for set-valued sequences

References

  1. Book: Border, Kim C.. Fixed Point Theorems with Applications to Economics and Game Theory. Cambridge University Press. 1989. 0-521-26564-9.
  2. Michael. Ernest. 1956. Continuous selections. I. Annals of Mathematics. Second Series. 63. 2. 361–382. 10.2307/1969615. 1969615. 0077107. Ernest Michael. 10338.dmlcz/119700. free.
  3. Book: Shapiro, Joel H. . A Fixed-Point Farrago . 2016 . Springer International Publishing . 978-3-319-27978-7 . 68–70 . 984777840.
  4. Deutsch. Frank. Kenderov. Petar. January 1983. Continuous Selections and Approximate Selection for Set-Valued Mappings and Applications to Metric Projections. SIAM Journal on Mathematical Analysis. 14. 1. 185–194. 10.1137/0514015.
  5. Xu. Yuguang. December 2001. A Note on a Continuous Approximate Selection Theorem. Journal of Approximation Theory. 113. 2. 324–325. 10.1006/jath.2001.3622. free.
  6. Yannelis. Nicholas C.. Prabhakar. N. D.. 1983-12-01. Existence of maximal elements and equilibria in linear topological spaces. Journal of Mathematical Economics. 12. 3. 233–245. 10.1016/0304-4068(83)90041-1. 0304-4068. 10.1.1.702.2938.
  7. V. I. Bogachev, "Measure Theory" Volume II, page 36.