Saturn L series | |
Manufacturer: | Saturn Corporation |
Production: | May 1999 – June 17, 2004 |
Model Years: | 2000–2005 |
Assembly: | Wilmington, Delaware, United States (Wilmington Assembly) |
Class: | Mid-size |
Platform: | GM2900 platform |
Related: | Opel Vectra B Saab 9-3 Saab 9-5 |
Layout: | Transverse front-engine, front-wheel drive |
Wheelbase: | 2705mm |
Length: | 4836mm |
Sp: | us |
Successor: | Saturn Aura |
The Saturn L series is a line of automobiles, sedans and station wagons that were made by Saturn Corporation in Wilmington, Delaware.
Poor sales of the L-series cars caused GM to cancel the line for 2005. The first L-series car was built in May 1999, and the last one rolled off the Wilmington line on June 17, 2004, after a short run of 2005 models. About 406,300 L-series cars were built in this period. The plant was then retooled to build the Pontiac Solstice and Saturn Sky roadsters.
The replacement for the L series, the Saturn Aura, arrived in August 2006 for the 2007 model-year. The Aura was built on the Epsilon platform, also shared by the Pontiac G6, and the Chevrolet Malibu.
The L series was troubled early in production by a number of quality issues, often related to engine failures, transmission failures and overall fit and finish issues. Consumers reported repeat problems with tire noise and vibration linked to poorly designed control arm bushings and nonadjustable rear alignments. A retrofit kit was released to address these concerns.
In 2005, a recall was issued pursuant to a defect petition by the North Carolina Consumers Council, a consumer nonprofit advocacy organization, alleging repeat brake and tail light failures. The resulting recall affected more than 300,000 vehicles in the United States and Canada.[1] Later that same year, the North Carolina Consumers Council petitioned for an investigation into timing chain failures and subsequent engine failures across the model lineup for vehicles using the 2.2L engine. The resulting recall affected only a small number of vehicles built in a four-month period in late 2000 and early 2001. The organization reported that complaints of engine failure due to a defective timing chain design persist to this day and requests for recall expansions have largely been ignored. The organization has gone so far as to make its first recommendation against the purchase of a vehicle in its more than forty-year history due in part to this timing chain defect.[2]
Moderate overlap frontal offset | Acceptable | |
Small overlap frontal offset | Not tested | |
Side impact | Poor | |
Roof strength | Marginal |
Year | Frontal driver | Frontal passenger | Side driver | Side passenger | 4x2 rollover | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
2000 | Not Rated | |||||
2001 | Not Rated | |||||
2002 | ||||||
2003 | ||||||
2004 | ||||||
2005 |