| Satta | |
| Director: | Madhur Bhandarkar |
| Producer: | Metalight Productions Pvt Ltd. |
| Starring: | Raveena Tandon Sameer Dharmadhikari Atul Kulkarni Vipin Sharma |
| Music: | Raju Singh |
| Editing: | Deepak Wirkud |
| Cinematography: | Madhu Rao |
| Studio: | Metalight Productions Pvt Ltd |
| Country: | India |
| Language: | Hindi |
Satta is a 2003 Indian Hindi-language political drama film co-written and directed by Madhur Bhandarkar. It stars Raveena Tandon in the lead role and Atul Kulkarni, Govind Namdev and Sameer Dharmadhikari appear in the supporting roles.[1] The film narrates the story of a persecuted wife of a greedy politician who takes on his role after he lands up in jail because of murder charges.[2] Released on 7 February 2003, Satta received critical acclaim upon release and is considered one of the best performances of Tandon.[3] [4] The film was released on the same day as Khushi, and Kash Aap Hamare Hote.[5]
Anuradha Sehgal re-locates to Mumbai, finds employment, meets and weds Mumbai's aspiring Chief Minister, Vivek Chauhan. She soon finds out that Vivek is a womanizer and an alcoholic. She then faces physical abuse. Vivek is arrested for murder and is jailed. The Chauhan family persuades her to stand for elections in her husband's place, which she does. She then witnesses the nexus between the underworld, businessmen, corrupt policemen, and politicians.
Satta opened to generally positive reviews. Deepa Gumaste of Rediff.com wrote: "Raveena Tandon has obviously landed the role of a lifetime and she makes the most of it. She portrays the firebrand Anuradha with the kind of passion you wouldn't have expected from the heroine who once danced to the tune of Tu cheez badi hai mast."[6] Taran Adarsh in his review wrote: "Raveena Tandon delivers a bravura performance. The actress takes giant strides as a performer, giving the right touches to her character. Here's a performance that's bound to be noticed."[7] Komal Nahta in a less favourable review wrote: "On the whole, Satta is a non-starter. Pretending to be an intellectual film, it would not even appeal to the intelligentsia because it offers nothing new."[8]