(M,\theta)
g
(M,g)
(M x {\R}>0)
of
M
{\R}>0
t2g+dt2,
where
t
{\R}>0
A manifold
M
\theta
d(t2\theta)=t2d\theta+2tdt\wedge\theta
on its cone is symplectic (this is one of the possibledefinitions of a contact structure). A contact Riemannian manifold is Sasakian, if its Riemannian cone with the cone metric is a Kähler manifold withKähler form
t2d\theta+2tdt\wedge\theta.
As an example consider
S2n-1\hookrightarrow{\R}2n={\C}n
where the right hand side is a natural Kähler manifold and read as the cone over the sphere (endowed with embedded metric). The contact 1-form on
S2n-1
i\vec{N}
\vec{N}
i
{\C}n
Another non-compact example is
{{\R}2n+1
(\vec{x},\vec{y},z)
\theta= | 12 |
dz+\sum |
iyidxi
and the Riemannian metric
g=\sumi
2+\theta | |
(dx | |
i) |
2.
As a third example consider:
{P}2n-1{R}\hookrightarrow{\C}n/{\Z}2
where the right hand side has a natural Kähler structure, and the group
{\Z}2
Sasakian manifolds were introduced in 1960 by the Japanese geometer Shigeo Sasaki.[1] There was not much activity in this field after the mid-1970s, until the advent of String theory. Since then Sasakian manifolds have gained prominence in physics and algebraic geometry, mostly due to a string of papers by Charles P. Boyer and Krzysztof Galicki and their co-authors.
The homothetic vector field on the cone over a Sasakian manifold is defined to be
t\partial/\partialt.
As the cone is by definition Kähler, there exists a complex structure J. The Reeb vector field on the Sasaskian manifold is defined to be
\xi=-J(t\partial/\partialt).
It is nowhere vanishing. It commutes with all holomorphic Killing vectors on the cone and in particular with all isometries of the Sasakian manifold. If the orbits of the vector field close then the space of orbits is a Kähler orbifold. The Reeb vector field at the Sasakian manifold at unit radius is a unit vector field and tangential to the embedding.
A Sasakian manifold
M
M
M
If M is positive-scalar-curvature Kähler–Einstein manifold, then, by an observation of Shoshichi Kobayashi, the circle bundle S in its canonical line bundle admits a Sasaki–Einstein metric, in a manner that makes the projection from S to M into a Riemannian submersion. (For example, it follows that there exist Sasaki–Einstein metrics on suitable circle bundles over the 3rd through 8th del Pezzo surfaces.) While this Riemannian submersion construction provides a correct local picture of any Sasaki–Einstein manifold, the global structure of such manifolds can be more complicated. For example, one can more generallyconstruct Sasaki–Einstein manifolds by starting from a Kähler–Einstein orbifold M. Using this observation, Boyer, Galicki, and János Kollár constructed infinitely many homeotypes of Sasaki-Einstein 5-manifolds. The same construction shows that the moduli space of Einstein metrics on the 5-sphere has at least several hundred connected components.