Saltopus Explained

Saltopus ("hopping foot") is a genus of very small bipedal dinosauriform containing the single species Saltopus elginensis from the late Triassic period of Scotland. It is one of the most famous Elgin Reptiles.

Description

Saltopus elginensis is known only from a single partial skeleton lacking the skull, but including parts of the vertebral column, the forelimbs, the pelvis and the hindlimbs. These have been mainly preserved as impressions or natural casts in the sandstone; very little bone material is present.[1] It was about the size of a domestic cat, and would have been roughly 80cm-100cmcm (30inches-00inchescm) long. It had hollow bones like those of birds and other dinosaurs. It may have weighed around 1kg (02lb). In 2016, it was estimated to be 50 cm long, 15 cm high at the hips, and 110 g.[2] Most of the length was accounted for by the tail. It had five-fingered hands, with the fourth and fifth finger reduced in size. Contrary to the original description, in 2011 it was established that the sacrum (hip vertebrae) was made up of two vertebrae, the primitive ancestral condition, not four.

History

The only known fossil of Saltopus was discovered in 1867 by William Taylor in the Lossiemouth West & East Quarries. It was initially named as a specimen of Telerpeton elginense (now Leptopleuron lacertinum) by Thomas Henry Huxley in 1867,[3] and it was later named and described by Friedrich von Huene in 1910 as the type species Saltopus elginensis.

The generic name is derived from Latin saltare, "to jump" and Greek πούς, pous, "foot". The specific name refers to its provenance near Elgin, which yields the Elgin Reptiles. The holotype NHMUK R.3915, was excavated from the Lossiemouth Sandstone Formation dating from the Carnian-Norian stage.[1]

Classification

Saltopus has been variously identified as a saurischian (lizard-hipped) dinosaur, a more advanced theropod, and a close relative of the herrerasaurs, but its taxonomy has been in dispute because only fragmentary remains have been recovered.[4] Some researchers, such as Gregory S. Paul,[5] have suggested it may represent a juvenile specimen of a coelophysid theropod such as Coelophysis or Procompsognathus. Rauhut and Hungerbühler in 2000 concluded it is a primitive dinosauriform, not a true dinosaur, closely related to Lagosuchus.[6] Michael Benton, continuing the studies of the late Alick Walker redescribing the fossil in 2011, found it to be a dinosauriform more derived than Lagosuchus.[7]

A large phylogenetic analysis of early dinosaurs and dinosauromorphs by Matthew Baron, David B. Norman and Paul Barrett (2017) recovered Saltopus near the base of the dinosaur lineage, suggesting that it may represent the closest relative of true dinosaurs.[8]

External links

Notes and References

  1. Huene, F.R. von (1910). "Ein primitiver Dinosaurier aus der mittleren Trias von Elgin." Geol. Pal. Abh. n. s., 8: 315-322.
  2. Molina-Pérez & Larramendi 2016. Récords y curiosidades de los dinosaurios Terópodos y otros dinosauromorfos, Larousse. Barcelona, Spain p. 19
  3. T. H. Huxley. (1867). On a new specimen of Telerpeton elginense. Quarterly Journal of the Geological Society of London 23:77-84
  4. Matthew G. Baron . Megan E. Williams . 2018 . A re-evaluation of the enigmatic dinosauriform Caseosaurus crosbyensis from the Late Triassic of Texas, USA and its implications for early dinosaur evolution . Acta Palaeontologica Polonica . 63 . 10.4202/app.00372.2017 . free .
  5. Paul, G.S. (1988). Predatory Dinosaurs of the World. New York: Simon and Schuster. 464 pp.
  6. Rauhut, O.M.W. and A. Hungerbühler. (2000). "A review of European Triassic theropods." Gaia, 15: 75-88.
  7. Michael J. Benton and Alick D. Walker†. 2011. "Saltopus, a dinosauriform from the Upper Triassic of Scotland", Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh, Volume 101, Special Issue 3-4, pp 285 - 299 Royal Society of Edinburgh 2011. Published online: 17 May 2011
  8. Baron, M.G., Norman, D.B., and Barrett, P.M. (2017). A new hypothesis of dinosaur relationships and early dinosaur evolution. Nature, 543: 501–506.