| Litigants: | Salman v. United States |
| Arguedate: | October 5 |
| Argueyear: | 2016 |
| Decidedate: | December 6 |
| Decideyear: | 2016 |
| Fullname: | Bassam Yacoub Salman, Petitioner v. United States |
| Docket: | 15–628 |
| Opinionannouncement: | https://www.supremecourt.gov/opinions/16pdf/15-628_m6ho.pdf |
| Usvol: | 580 |
| Uspage: | ___ |
| Parallelcitations: | 137 S. Ct. 420; 196 L. Ed. 2d 351 |
| Prior: | Conviction affirmed, 792 F.3d 1087 (9th Cir. 2015) |
| Holding: | Under Dirks, the jury could infer that the tipper here personally benefited from making a gift of confidential information to a trading relative. |
| Majority: | Alito |
| Joinmajority: | unanimous |
| Lawsapplied: | Securities Exchange Act of 1934 |
Salman v. United States, 580 U.S. ___ (2016), was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court held that gifts of confidential information without any compensation to relatives for the purposes of insider trading are a violation of securities laws.[1] The Court relied on its decision in, which held that "that a tippee is exposed to liability for trading on inside information only if the tippee participates in a breach of the tipper's fiduciary duty."[2]
A jury convicted Bassam Yacoub Salman of securities fraud and U.S. District Judge Edward M. Chen then denied Salman's motion for a new trial. On July 6, 2015, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the conviction, in which Judge Jed S. Rakoff was joined by Judges Morgan Christen and Paul J. Watford.[3]
On October 5, 2016, oral arguments were heard, where Deputy Solicitor General Michael Dreeben appeared for the government.[4]
On December 6, 2016, the Supreme Court delivered judgment in favor of the government, voting unanimously to affirm the lower court. Justice Samuel Alito authored the opinion of the Court.[5]