Salina Group Explained

Salina Group
Period:Upper Silurian
Type:Geological group
Prilithology:Dolomite & Shale
Otherlithology:Anhydrite, Limestone, Gypsum & Halite
Unitof:Cayugan Series
Subunits:Appalachian Basin & Michigan Basin

Illinois Basin

  • Wabash Formation
    • Liston Creek Member
    • Kenneth Limestone Member
    • Kokomo Limestone Member
    • Misslssinewa Shale Formation
  • Pleant Mills Limestone
    • Limberlost Member
Underlies:Helderberg Group
Overlies:Lockport Group & Bloomsburg Formation
Region:Appalachian Basin & Michigan Basin of eastern North America
Country:United States of America and Canada
Namedfor:Salt found within the formation
Namedby:James Dwight Dana
Age:Homerian-Přídolí
~

The Salina Group or Salina Formation is a Late Silurian-age, Stratigraphic unit of sedimentary rock that is found in Northeastern and Midwestern North America. Named for its Halite beds, the phrase "Salina Group" was first used as a descriptive term by James D. Dana in 1863.[1]

The Salina is an extensive formation. It ranges from West Virginia up through Pennsylvania into Ohio and then Michigan in the United States, and from Pennsylvania into New York. It is also found in the Canadian province of Ontario. (See Figure 1.)

The thickness of the Salina Group varies greatly within the two basins, ranging from 84 feet in the southwestern corner of Michigan to an estimated 5,000 feet in that state's Gladwin County.

This formation is of economic importance for salt mining, oil reservoir creation,[2] gypsum mining,[3] and potential natural gas storage.[4] Research has also been done on the viability of storing radioactive waste in the salt beds of the Salina.[5]

Description

The Salina Formation is composed chiefly of dolomite and shale, interbedded with anhydrite, gypsum, and salt.[6]

Stratigraphy

Stratigraphically, the Salina is placed in the Late Silurian age and is the lower member of the Cayugan Series. It overlies predominantly the Lockport; in parts central to northeast Pennsylvania it overlies the Bloomsburg Formation. It also underlies the Helderberg Group.[7]

Appalachian & Michigan Basins

Being a thick formation, the Salina has subunits, as well as letter designations for the different formations. The letters originate at the base (oldest) with the A unit to the stratigraphic top H unit (youngest) made up of Anhydrite.[8]

During an extensive study in the state of Michigan, each unit was mapped. Unit A consists of dolomite and shaly dolomite, and is the bottom of the Vernon. Where the formation thickens, there may also be one or two large salt beds within the unit. Anhydrite can be found throughout this unit.[9] Due to unit A having two salt or anhydrite beds, it is often divided into the A1 and A2, with A1 being the basal unit.[10]

Unit B is another salt unit and marks the Middle Vernon. The percentage of salt can range from 90% to 100%. Thin dolomite beds run through this unit. In comparison, Unit C marks the top of the Vernon Formation. It is a shaly dolomite; however, it can range from pure shale to pure dolomite beds within the unit. Anhydrite can be prevalent within this unit as well.

Unit D, the bottom of the Syracuse formation, is almost pure salt. Some dolomite may also occur within this unit. It is the thinnest unit of the Salina, and is not always present.

Unit E consists of shale, but can include dolomitic shale and dolomite. Anhydrite may also be present within this unit and is also part of the Syracuse.

Unit F is the youngest and largest salt in the group, also known as the Syracuse Formation. Where thicker, the F has beds of salt separated by rock grading from shale to dolomite, often with anhydrite present especially in the shale.

Unit G is the Camillus, which consists of dolomite and anhydrite while unit H is known as the Bertie Formation. In the Michigan Basin, the Bertie is pinched out; the Bass Islands Formation makes up the upper most Salina.

Illinois Basin

Wabash Formation

Wabash Formation made up of the Liston Creek Member, Kenneth Limestone Member, Kokomo Limestone Member and the Misslssinewa Shale member.

Pleasant Mills Formation

The Pleasant Mills Formation is made up of the Louisville Equivalent Member and Waldon Equivalent Member and Limberlost Dolomite Member. The Pleasant Mills Formation is equivalent to the entire "A Unit" in the Appalachian Basin.[11]

Economic Resources

Salt

Salt mines and brine wells are located in Western New York, Northeast Ohio and Detroit, Michigan with Ohio's salt production predating European settlement of the area as Native Americans collected and processed brine from springs in several locations, including "salt licks" where minerals were deposited by brine seeping out of the ground. Licking County was named for this natural phenomenon.[12] Mahoning County's name is derived from a Native American term "ma-hon-ink" meaning "at the lick."[13]

Throughout the early 1800s, Ohio's salt demand exceeded its production from brine wells and licks. Oil and gas exploration facilitated the discovery of salt during the 1860s; however, it was not until 1886 when the Cleveland Rolling Mill was drilling its second natural gas well that it hit brine. The salt was located at a depth of approximately 1,900 feet.

By the 1890s, brine wells were drilled and operating in Cleveland. During this period, five salt-producing companies operated in Northeast Ohio. Sterling Morton built a salt mine at a depth of 1800 feet on Cleveland's east side and Clarence Foster examined drilling records from Standard Oil along Lake Erie.

Gypsum

In 1827, Gypsum was first identified in Michigan, near Grand Rapids. An Odawa man discovered it in a rock outcrop along Plaster Creek where it enters Grand River.[14]

In 1838, Michigan's first state geologist, Douglass Houghton, arrived to select a site for salt mining and reported an abundance of gypsum in the area. That same year, he and Bela Hubbard discovered an outcrop of gypsum at the mouth of the Au Gres River in Saginaw Bay. In 1841, Daniel Ball and business partner Warren Granger built a mill to process gypsum in 1841; a mill built by Houghton and Hubbard in Alabaster, Michigan became operational in 1862.[14]

Oil and Gas

The Salina serves as an oil reservoir formation along the Findlay Arch from Southwestern Michigan down into Northwest Ohio. Salt in not present along the Arch System.

Fossils

Algae

Medusaegraptus graminiformis (Ruedemann 1925)

Brachiopoda

Orbiculoidea bertiensis (Ruedemann)

Lingula semina (Ruedemann)

Coral

Cyathophyllum hydraulicum (Simpson)

Eurypterida

Eurypterus remipes (DeKay, 1825)

Archaeophonus eurypteroides (Kjellesvig-Waering 1966)

Proscorpius osborni (Whitfield 1885)

Paracarcinosoma scorpionis (Grote & Pitt)

Eurypterus lacustris (Harlan, 1834)

Erettopterus waylandsmithi (Kjellesvig-Waering & Caster 1955)

Waeringopterus cumberlandicus (Leutze, 1961)

Waeringopterus apfeli (Leutze, 1961)

Dolichopterus herkimerensis (Caster and Kjellesvig-Waering 1956)

Ostracodes

Leperditia scalaris (Jones 1856)

Mollusca

Bivalvia

Megalomus canadensis (Hall, 1852)

Gastropoda

Notes and References

  1. Web site: Elowski . Ronald C. . 1980 . GIMDL-RI25.PDF . State of Michigan.
  2. Web site: Ells . Garland D. . April 1958 . PROGRESS REPORT NUMBER EIGHTEEN Notes on the Devonian-Silurian in the Subsurface of Southwest Michigan . State of Michigan - michigan.gov.
  3. Web site: Stone . R.W . 1920 . GYPSUM DEPOSITS OF THE UNITED STATES . United States Geological Survey.
  4. Web site: Carter . Kristin M. . Patchen . Douglas G. . Moore . Jessica P. . Fakhari . Mohammad . Daft, Jr. . Gary W. . Solis . Michael . Dunst . Brian J. . Anthony . Robin V. . Metz . Kyle . August 1, 2016 – July 31, 2017 . A Geological Study to Determine the Potential to Create an Appalachian Storage Hub for Natural Gas Liquids . West Virginia Geological Survey.
  5. Web site: PIERCE . W. G. . RICH . E. I. . 1962 . Summary of Rock Salt Deposits in the United States as Possible Storage Sites for Radioactive Waste Materials . United States Geological Survey.
  6. Web site: Norris . Stanley E. . June 1978 . HYDROLOGIC ENVIRONMENT OF THE SILURIAN SALT DEPOSITS IN PARTS OF MICHIGAN, OHIO, AND NEW YORK . United States Geological Survey.
  7. Web site: Fergusson . William B. . Prather . Bruce A. . 1968 . Salt Deposits in the Salina Group in Pennsylvania . Pennsylvania, Bureau of Topographic and Geologic Survey .
  8. Web site: Janssens . Adriaan . 1977 . SILURIAN ROCKS IN THE SUBSURFACE OF NORTHWESTERN OHIO . OHIO DEPARTMENT OF NATURAL RESOURCES.
  9. Web site: Landes . Kenneth K. . 1945 . THE SALINA AND BASS ISLAND ROCKS IN THE MICHIGAN BASIN . United States Geological Survey.
  10. Web site: Rickard . Lawernce . 1969 . Stratigraphy of the Upper Silurian Salina Group New York, Pennsylvania, Ohio, Ontario . 4 April 2023 . New York State Museum.
  11. Web site: DROSTE . JOHN B. . SHAVER . ROBERT H. . 1982 . THE SALINA GROUP (MIDDLE AND UPPER SILURIAN) OF INDIANA Special Report 24 . IUScholarWorks Indiana University.
  12. News: Sheban . Jeffrey . 30 November 2011 . Saltology 101 . The Columbus Dispatch . 4 March 2023.
  13. Web site: ROCK SALT . 4 April 2023 . Case Western Reserve University. 10 September 2021 .
  14. Web site: Schaetzl . Richard . Gypsum Mining . Michigan State University.