Safety sign explained

Safety signs are a type of sign designed to warn of hazards, indicate mandatory actions or required use of Personal protective equipment, prohibit actions or objects, identify the location of firefighting or safety equipment, or marking of exit routes.

In addition to being encountered in industrial facilities; safety signs are also found in public places and communities, at electrical pylons and Electrical substations, cliffs, beaches, bodies of water, on motorized equipment, such as lawn mowers, and areas closed for construction or demolition.

History

In the United States

Early signs and ASA Z35.1

One of the earliest attempts to standardize safety signage in the United States was the 1914 Universal Safety Standards.[1] The signs were fairly simple in nature, consisting of an illuminated board with "DANGER" in white letters on a red field.[1] An arrow was added to draw attention to the danger if it was less obvious. Signs indicating exits, first aid kits consisted of a green board, with white letters. The goal with signs was to inform briefly.The next major standards to follow were ASA Z35.1 in 1941, which later revised in 1967 and 1968.The Occupational Safety and Health Administration devised their requirements from ASA Z35.1-1968 in the development of their rules, OSHA §1910.145 for the usage of safety signage[2]

ANSI Z535

In the 1980s, American National Standards Institute formed a committee to update the Z53 and Z35 standards. In 1991, ANSI Z535 was introduced, which was intended to modernize signage through increased use of symbols, the introduction of a new header, 'Warning' and requiring that wording not just state the hazard, but also the possible harm the hazard could inflict and how to avoid the hazard.[3] Until 2013, OSHA regulations[4] technically required usage of signage prescribed in OSHA §1910.145, based on the standard ASA Z35.1-1968. Regulation changes and clarification of the law now allow usage of signs complying with either OSHA §1910.145 or ANSI Z535 designs.[5]

In Europe

Prior to widespread globalization and adoption of standards from the ISO, most countries developed their own standards for safety signage. Text only signs were common prior to introduction of European Council Directive 77/576/EEC on 25 July 1977, which required member states to have policies in place to ensure that "safety signs at all places of work conform to the principles laid down in Annex I", which required color coding and symbols.In 1992, the European Council Directive 92/58/EEC replaced EEC 77/576/EEC. The new directive included improved information on how to utilize safety signage effectively. Beyond safety signs, EEC Directive 92/58/EEC standardize markings for fire equipment, acoustic signals, verbal and hand signals for vehicle movements.[6] In 2013, the European Union adopted ISO 7010 to replace the symbols provided previously, adopting them as European Norm (EN) ISO 7010, standardizing symbols among the EU countries. Prior to this, while symbols were provided, symbols were permitted to vary in appearance "provided that they convey the same meaning and that no difference or adaptation obscures the meaning".[6]

In Australia

Australian safety signage started in 1952 as CZ4-1952: Safety signs for the occupational environment. It revised and redesignated as AS1319-1972 in 1972, with further revisions taking place in 1979, 1983 and 1994. In August 2018, AS1319-1994 was reconfirmed as still being valid and not in need of major revisions.

In Japan

Japanese safety signage is notable for its clear visual differences from international norms, such as use of square 'no symbols', vertical formatting of sign text. Safety sign standards are regulated by Japanese Industrial Standards through standards JIS Z9101 (Workplace and public area safety signs) JIS Z 9103 (Safety sign colors) and JIS Z 9104 (Safety signs - General specifications). While design trends have been moving towards international norms of ISO and ANSI standards, differences are still present such as the use of symbols unique to the JIS standards, using colors differently from ISO standards and using a combination of Japanese kanji and English.In addition to typical safety sign standards, Japan introduced JIS Z 9098 in 2016 specifically addressing emergency management needs: informing people of areas susceptible to natural disasters, evacuation routes and safe shelters from disasters. The standard's more unique aspect is the usage of maps and diagrams to provide more detailed information about the area's hazards, shelters and evacuation routes.[7]

In China

Chinese safety signage is regulated by Standardization Administration of China using GB standards 2893-2008 and 2894-2008,[8] [9] which all safety signs are legally required to comply with.[10] Designs are similar to ISO 3864 and uses older ISO 7010:2003 symbols, while adding several additional symbols covering a wider range of prohibitions and hazards.[9]

Sign design and layout

Modern signage design typically consists of a symbol, warning text and in some countries a header consisting of a signal word.

Headers

See main article: Precautionary statement.

North American and some Australian safety signage utilize distinctive headers to draw attention to the risk of harm from a hazard. Headers have guidelines for usage, where conditions must be met to dictate which header must be used for a sign.

Header Types
OSHA/ANSI Z35.1 ANSI Z535 Signal Word Intended Use
Situation that will result in serious injury or death.
Situation could result in serious injury or death.
Situation could result moderate or minor injury.
Situations that at worst will only result in property damage and will not result in physical injuries.
The 2007 revisions to ANSI Z353.4 allowed for the 'safety alert symbol' found on 'Danger', Warning' and 'Caution' headers to be replaced with the ISO 7010 "W001 - General warning" symbol to enable compliance with ISO 3864-1 for signs used in international situations or equipment being exported abroad. Additional headers designs exist, Z53.1-1968 prescribed a magenta and yellow 'Radiation' header for radiation hazards. Other headers have been created by sign manufacturers for various situations not covered Z53.1 standard, such as "Security Notice", "Biohazard", "Restricted Area".

Symbols

See also: Hazard symbol. As a means of overcoming language and literacy barriers, symbols depicting the hazards, required action or equipment, prohibited actions or items and safety equipment were introduced to safety signage during the 1990s. Globalization and increased international trade helped push this development, as a means of reducing costs associated with needing signage multiple languages.[3] Increasingly, countries are adopting symbols used by ISO 7010 and UN Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals, that harmonizes symbols internationally to reduce confusion, and bring themselves into compliance with international standards.

Portable signage

For temporary situations such as wet floors, portable signs are used. They are designed to be self supporting and relatively easy to move once the task is complete. The 1914 Universal Safety Standards[1] provided for a portable 'Danger' sign suitable for both hard floors and soft dirt. Portable signs can take a variety of forms, from a traffic cone with stick on letters, plastic a-frame signs, to safety signs mounted on poles with bases that enable movement.[11]

Wet floor signs are also intended to avoid legal liability from injury due failing to warn of an unsafe condition.[12] They are usually yellow.[13] The warning is sometimes enhanced with new technology to provide audible warnings. Robotic cleaning equipment can use wet floor signs with sonar gadgetry to know when its job is finished.[14]

Effectiveness of safety signs

Since the late 1980s, more emphasis has been put on testing signage for clarity and to eliminate possible misunderstandings. Researchers have examined the impacts of using different signal words, inclusion of borders and color contrast with text and symbols against sign backgrounds.[15] In 1999, a group of designers were tasked with creating standardized warning labels for personal watercraft. The group devised several versions of the same warning label using different symbols, wording and emphasis of key phrases through use of underlining, bold fonts and capitalizing. The label designs were reviewed by the United States Coast Guard, United States Power Squadron, industry representatives and subjected to ease of comprehension and readability tests. Results of these reviews and tests lead to further revisions of words and redesigning of some symbols.[16] The resulting labels are still applied to personal watercraft nearly 20 years after their initial design.[17]

Placement of signs also affects the effectiveness of signs. A 1993 study tested compliance with a warning against loading the top drawer of a filing cabinet first. The warning was least effective when it was only placed on the shipping box, but most effective when placed as part of a removable cardboard sleeve that physically obstructed the top drawer, interfering with adding files to the drawer.[18]

Sign effectiveness can be reduced from a number of factors, including information overload, where the sheer amount of information is presented in a manner that a reader is unable process it adequately, such as being confronted by a sign consisting of dozens of words with no paragraph breaks, or excessive amounts of unnecessary information. This can be prevented through simplifying warnings down to their key points, with supplementary manuals or training covering the more nuanced and minor information. Overwarning is a related problem, where warnings are overlooked by people due to the sheer number of warnings, such as placing many safety signs together, redundant or obvious warnings.[15] Effectiveness can be reduced through conditions such as poor maintenance, placing a sign too high or low, or in a way that requires excessive effort to read.[15] [6]

Technical standards

TitleAreaYear of AdoptionStatus
ISO 3864[19] [20] [21] International2011–2016current
ISO 7010[22] International2011current
ISO 7001[23] International2007current
ISO 20712-1[24] [25] International2008superseded in 2018 by ISO 7010
ISO/R 557:1967 "Symbols, dimensions and layout for safety signs"[26] International1967superseded in 1984 by ISO 3864:1984
Globally Harmonized System of Classification and Labelling of Chemicals (GHS)[27] International2005–2017current
(IMO) Resolution A.1116(30)[28] International2017current
(IMO) Resolution A.760(18)[29] International1993superseded in 2017 by Resolution A.1116(30)
(IMO) Resolution A.603(15)[30] International1987superseded in 1993 by Resolution A.760(18)
Regulation (EC) No 1272/2008[31] European Union2009current
Directive 92/58/EEC[32] European Union1992current
Directive 67/548/EECEuropean Union1967superseded in 2016 by CLP[33]
Directive 77/576/EEC[34] European Union1977superseded in 1992 by Directive 92/58/EEC
ANSI Z535-2011[35] United States2011current
ANSI Z35.1United States1941superseded in 1991 by ANSI Z535-1991
BS 5499[36] Great Britainsuperseded in 2015 by BS EN ISO 7010
DIN 4844-2:2001Germany2001superseded in 2013 by DIN EN ISO 7010[37] [38]
AS1319-1994Australia1994current
JIS Z 9101 "Workplace and public area safety signs"Japan2005current
JIS Z 9104 "General safety signs"Japan2005current
JIS Z 9098 "Emergency Management Signs"[39] Japan2016current
GB 2893-2008 "Safety Colours"[40] China2008current
GB 2894-2008 "Safety Signs and Guidelines for Use"[41] China2008current

See also

Notes and References

  1. Book: Hansen . Carl Marius . Universal Safety Standards: A Reference Book of Rules, Drawings, Tables, Formulae, Data Suggestions for Use of Architects, Engineers, Superintendents, Foremen, Inspectors, Mechanics and Students . 1914 . Universal Safety Standards Publishing Company . New York, New York . 38, 108–109 (Note: Page 109 is missing from this source's scan.) . 2nd . 17 November 2018 . en.
  2. Web site: Occupational Health and Safety Administration . §1910.145 Specifications for accident prevention signs and tags. . Electronic Code of Federal Regulations . United States Federal Government . 17 November 2018 . en.
  3. Web site: American National Standards Institute . American National Standards Institute . ANSI Z535.4-2011 - Product Safety Signs & Labels . ANSI . 22 November 2018 . https://web.archive.org/web/20180417061020/http://www.davis-inc.com/expert/docs/z535p4-2011.pdf . 17 April 2018 . en. November 15, 2011.
  4. Web site: Occupational Safety and Health Administration . Standard Interpretations - ANSI standards regarding accident prevention signs and physical hazard marking. . OSHA.gov . 22 November 2018 . en . February 22, 2011.
  5. Web site: safetysigns.com . Do I need OSHA or ANSI safety signs? . 16 November 2018 . en.
  6. Web site: European Economic Council . 24 June 1992 . Council Directive 92/58/EEC of 24 June 1992 on the minimum requirements for the provision of safety and/or health signs at work . 17 November 2018 . EUR-Lex . en.
  7. Web site: JIS Z 9098で用いるJIS図記号 . Aboc . 3 March 2019 . ja . 2016.
  8. Web site: Guobiao Standards . Guobiao standards . Safety colours . 4 March 2019 . https://web.archive.org/web/20190304020045/http://www.smzjfy.com/pics/y2017/m7/d5/fn2017751928252017160fc017c1e50abc866030cdd012039e2.pdf . 4 March 2019 . zh . 12 November 2008.
  9. Web site: Guobiao Standards . Guobiao standards . Safety signs and guideline for the use . 4 March 2019 . https://web.archive.org/web/20180516205436/http://www.coalinfo.net.cn/noncoal/bz/gb/other/%E5%9F%BA%E7%A1%80%E6%A0%87%E5%87%86/GB%202894-2008%20%E5%AE%89%E5%85%A8%E6%A0%87%E5%BF%97%E5%8F%8A%E5%85%B6%E4%BD%BF%E7%94%A8%E5%AF%BC%E5%88%99.pdf . 16 May 2018 . zh . 11 November 2008.
  10. Web site: ANSI . American National Standards Institute . PRC Standards System: standards Used in China . StandardsPortal.org . 4 March 2019 . en . GB: Mandatory National Standards.
  11. Web site: Tufts . John . City installs $75K portable traffic signals to curb vehicle crashes at busy intersection . San Angelo . . 12 February 2020 . en.
  12. Book: Slip and Fall Prevention: A Practical Handbook. Steven Di Pilla. CRC Press. 978-1-56670-659-9. 2004-06-02.
  13. Eccles . Kimberly A. . Hummer . Joseph E. . SAFETY EFFECTS OF FLUORESCENT YELLOW WARNING SIGNS AT HAZARDOUS SITES IN DAYLIGHT . TRB Paper 01–2236 . 3 . 11 February 2020 . . The Problem Yellow warning signs are an important and abundant type of traffic control device. Yellow warning signs inform the motorist about potentially hazardous conditions on, or adjacent to, a highway. Yellow warning signs may prompt a driver to become more alert, exercise more caution, or reduce speed. Yellow warning signs are commonly used prior to changes in alignment, changes in cross section, intersections, signals, or STOP signs. Because they are relatively inexpensive, many engineers believe that installing warning signs is generally one of the most cost-effective safety countermeasures available..
  14. Larson. Jan. 1998. RoboKent - a case study in man-machine interfaces. Industrial Robot. 25. 2. 95–100. 0143-991X. 10.1108/01439919810204577. 2013-03-03.
  15. Book: Wogalter . Michael S. . DeJoy . David M. . Laughery . Kenneth R. . Warnings and Risk Communication . 1999 . Taylor & Francis . Philadelphia, PA . 978-0-7484-0266-3.
  16. Book: Wogalter . Michael S . Handbook of Warnings . 2006 . Lawrence Erlbaum Associates . London . 978-0-8058-4724-6 . 723–737 . registration .
  17. Web site: Yamaha . Yamaha Waverunner Owner Manual . 13 March 2019 . 6 . en . E-book . June 2017.
  18. Book: Edworthy . Judy . Adams . Austin . Warning Design : A Research Prospective . 1996 . Taylor & Francis . Bristol, PA . 978-0748400904 . 1st . en . 2 - Warning Labels.
  19. Web site: International Organization for Standardization . International Organization for Standardization . April 2011 . ISO 3864-1:2011 . 4 April 2018.
  20. Web site: International Organization for Standardization . International Organization for Standardization . December 2016 . ISO 3864-2:2016 . 4 April 2018.
  21. Web site: International Organization for Standardization . International Organization for Standardization . March 2011 . ISO 3864-4:2011 . 4 April 2018.
  22. Web site: International Organization for Standardization . International Organization for Standardization . June 2011 . ISO 7010:2011 . 4 April 2018.
  23. Web site: International Organization for Standardization . International Organization for Standardization . November 2007 . ISO 7001:2007 . 4 April 2018.
  24. Web site: International Organization for Standardization . 2017 . ISO/PRF 7010 Graphical symbols -- Safety colours and safety signs -- Registered safety signs . 22 November 2018 . en.
  25. Web site: International Organization for Standardization . International Organization for Standardization . August 2007 . ISO 20712-1:2008 . 4 April 2018.
  26. Web site: ISO/R 557:1967 Symbols, dimensions and layout for safety signs . March 1, 2021 . ISO.
  27. Web site: United Nations Economic Commission for Europe . About the GHS . 16 November 2018 . unece.org . en.
  28. Web site: Resolution A.1116(30) Adopted on 5 December 2017 ESCAPE ROUTE SIGNS AND EQUIPMENT LOCATION MARKINGS . 2023-11-06.
  29. Web site: RESOLUTION A.760(18) adopted on 4 November 1993 SYMBOLS RELATED TO LIFE-SAVING APPLIANCES AND ARRANGEMENTS . 2023-11-06.
  30. Web site: RESOLUTION A.603(15) adopted on 19 November 1987 SYMBOLS RELATED TO LIFE-SAVING APPLIANCES AND ARRANGEMENTS . 2023-11-06.
  31. Web site: 2016-12-20 . Classification, Labelling and Packaging (CLP) Regulations . 8 March 2019 . . en.
  32. Web site: EUR-Lex . 24 June 1992 . Minimum requirements for the provision of safety and/or health signs at work . 22 November 2018 . EUR-Lex - Access to European Union Law . en.
  33. Web site: European Commission . 16 November 2018 . Classification and Labelling (CLP/GHS) . 16 November 2018 . ec.europa.eu . en.
  34. Web site: European Economic Council . 25 July 1977 . Council Directive 77/576/EEC of 25 July 1977 on the approximation of the laws, regulations and administrative provisions of the Member States relating to the provision of safety signs at places of work . 21 December 2018 . EUR-Lex . en.
  35. Web site: American National Standards Institute . American National Standards Institute . November 15, 2011 . ANSI Z535.4-2011 - Product Safety Signs & Labels . https://web.archive.org/web/20180417061020/http://www.davis-inc.com/expert/docs/z535p4-2011.pdf . 17 April 2018 . 22 November 2018 . ANSI . en.
  36. Web site: Health and Safety Executive . Safety signs and signals - 3rd Edition . 16 November 2018 . United Kingdom Government . en.
  37. Web site: DIN EN ISO 7010:2012-10 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20160125205455/http://www.din.de/de/mitwirken/normenausschuesse/nasg/normen/wdc-beuth:din21:154937954 . 2016-01-25 . www.din.de.
  38. Web site: German Institute for Standardization . October 2012 . DIN EN ISO 7010 Graphical symbols - Safety colours and safety signs - Registered safety signs (ISO 7010:2011); German version EN ISO 7010:2012 . 16 November 2018 . din.de . en.
  39. Web site: Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry . Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry . Japanese Industrial Standards Committee (JISC) . JIS Z 9098 災害種別避難誘導標識システム 国際提案について . https://web.archive.org/web/20190303225429/https://www.2020games.metro.tokyo.jp/multilingual/council/pdf/meeting_05/reference11.pdf . 3 March 2019 . 3 March 2019 . Bureau of Olympic and Paralympic Games Tokyo 2020 Preparation . en.
  40. Web site: Guobiao Standards . Guobiao standards . 12 November 2008 . Safety colours . https://web.archive.org/web/20190304020045/http://www.smzjfy.com/pics/y2017/m7/d5/fn2017751928252017160fc017c1e50abc866030cdd012039e2.pdf . 4 March 2019 . 4 March 2019 . zh.
  41. Web site: Guobiao Standards . Guobiao standards . 11 November 2008 . Safety signs and guideline for the use . https://web.archive.org/web/20180516205436/http://www.coalinfo.net.cn/noncoal/bz/gb/other/%E5%9F%BA%E7%A1%80%E6%A0%87%E5%87%86/GB%202894-2008%20%E5%AE%89%E5%85%A8%E6%A0%87%E5%BF%97%E5%8F%8A%E5%85%B6%E4%BD%BF%E7%94%A8%E5%AF%BC%E5%88%99.pdf . 16 May 2018 . 4 March 2019 . zh.