STRING explained

STRING
Description:Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins
Center:Academic Consortium
Pmid:30476243
Url:STRING website
Download:url
Webservice:rest
Version:12.0 (July 2023)

In molecular biology, STRING (Search Tool for the Retrieval of Interacting Genes/Proteins) is a biological database and web resource of known and predicted protein–protein interactions.[1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6]

The STRING database contains information from numerous sources, including experimental data, computational prediction methods and public text collections. It is freely accessible and it is regularly updated. The resource also serves to highlight functional enrichments in user-provided lists of proteins, using a number of functional classification systems such as GO, Pfam and KEGG. The latest version 11b contains information on about 24,5 million proteins from more than 5000 organisms. STRING has been developed by a consortium of academic institutions including CPR, EMBL, KU, SIB, TUD and UZH.

Usage

Protein–protein interaction networks are an important ingredient for the system-level understanding of cellular processes. Such networks can be used for filtering and assessing functional genomics data and for providing an intuitive platform for annotating structural, functional and evolutionary properties of proteins.Exploring the predicted interaction networks can suggest new directions for future experimental research and provide cross-species predictions for efficient interaction mapping.[7]

Features

The data is weighted and integrated and a confidence score is calculated for all protein interactions. Results of the various computational predictions can be inspected from different designated views. There are two modes of STRING: Protein-mode and COG-mode. Predicted interactions are propagated to proteins in other organisms for which interaction has been described by inference of orthology. A web interface is available to access the data and to give a fast overview of the proteins and their interactions. A plug-in for cytoscape to use STRING data is available.Another possibility to access data STRING is to use the application programming interface (API) by constructing a URL that contain the request.

Data sources

Like many other databases that store protein association knowledge, STRING imports data from experimentally derived protein–protein interactions through literature curation. Furthermore, STRING also store computationally predicted interactions from: (i) text mining of scientific texts, (ii) interactions computed from genomic features, and (iii) interactions transferred from model organisms based on orthology.[8]

All predicted or imported interactions are benchmarked against a common reference of functional partnership as annotated by KEGG (Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes).

Imported data

STRING imports protein association knowledge from databases of physical interaction and databases of curated biological pathway knowledge(MINT, HPRD, BIND, DIP, BioGRID, KEGG, Reactome, IntAct, EcoCyc, NCI-Nature Pathway Interaction Database, GO).Links are supplied to the originating data of the respective experimental repositories and database resources.

Text mining

A large body of scientific texts (SGD, OMIM, FlyBase, PubMed) are parsed to search for statistically relevant co-occurrences of gene names.

Predicted data

External links

Notes and References

  1. Szklarczyk. Damian. Gable. Annika L.. Lyon. David. Junge. Alexander. Wyder. Stefan. Huerta-Cepas. Jaime. Simonovic. Milan. Doncheva. Nadezhda T.. Morris. John H.. Bork. Peer. Jensen. Lars J.. 2019-01-08. STRING v11: protein-protein association networks with increased coverage, supporting functional discovery in genome-wide experimental datasets. Nucleic Acids Research. 47. D1. D607–D613. 10.1093/nar/gky1131. 1362-4962. 6323986. 30476243.
  2. Szklarczyk. Damian. Morris. John H.. Cook. Helen. Kuhn. Michael. Wyder. Stefan. Simonovic. Milan. Santos. Alberto. Doncheva. Nadezhda T.. Roth. Alexander. Bork. Peer. Jensen. Lars J.. 4 January 2017. The STRING database in 2017: quality-controlled protein-protein association networks, made broadly accessible. Nucleic Acids Research. 45. D1. D362–D368. 10.1093/nar/gkw937. 1362-4962. 5210637. 27924014.
  3. Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Wyder S, Forslund K, Heller D, Huerta-Cepas J, Simonovic M, Roth A, Santos A, Tsafou KP, Kuhn M, Bork P, Jensen LJ, von Mering C . STRING v10: protein-protein interaction networks, integrated over the tree of life . Nucleic Acids Res. . 43 . Database issue . D447–52 . 2015 . 25352553 . 4383874 . 10.1093/nar/gku1003 .
  4. Franceschini A, Szklarczyk D, Frankild S, Kuhn M, Simonovic M, Roth A, Lin J, Minguez P, Bork P, von Mering C, Jensen LJ . STRING v9.1: protein-protein interaction networks, with increased coverage and integration . Nucleic Acids Res. . 41 . Database issue . D808–15 . 2013 . 23203871 . 3531103 . 10.1093/nar/gks1094 .
  5. Szklarczyk D, Franceschini A, Kuhn M, Simonovic M, Roth A, Minguez P, Doerks T, Stark M, Muller J, Bork P, Jensen LJ, von Mering C . The STRING database in 2011: functional interaction networks of proteins, globally integrated and scored . Nucleic Acids Res. . 39 . Database issue . D561–8 . 2011 . 21045058 . 3013807 . 10.1093/nar/gkq973 .
  6. Snel, B . Lehmann, G . Bork, P . Huynen, MA . amp . STRING: a web-server to retrieve and display the repeatedly occurring neighbourhood of a gene . Nucleic Acids Res . 28 . 18 . 3442–4 . 2000 . 10982861 . 10.1093/nar/28.18.3442 . 110752.
  7. Schwartz, AS . Yu, J . Gardenour, KR . Finley Jr . RL . Ideker, T . amp . Cost-effective strategies for completing the interactome . Nature Methods . 6 . 55–61 . 2008 . 19079254 . 10.1038/nmeth.1283 . 1 . 2613168.
  8. Wodak, SJ . Pu, S . Vlasblom, J . Séraphin, B . amp . Challenges and rewards of interaction proteomics . Mol Cell Proteomics . 8 . 1 . 3–18 . 2009 . 18799807 . 10.1074/mcp.R800014-MCP200. free.