Soviet–American Gallium Experiment Explained

SAGE (Soviet–American Gallium Experiment, or sometimes Russian-American Gallium Experiment) is a collaborative experiment devised by several prominent physicists to measure the solar neutrino flux.

The experiment

SAGE was devised to measure the radio-chemical solar neutrino flux based on the inverse beta decay reaction, 71Ga

+\nuee-+

71Ge. The target for the reaction was 50-57 tonnes of liquid gallium metal stored deep (2100 meters) underground at the Baksan Neutrino Observatory in the Caucasus mountains in Russia. The laboratory containing the SAGE-experiment is called gallium-germanium neutrino telescope (GGNT) laboratory, GGNT being the name of the SAGE experimental apparatus. About once a month, the neutrino induced Ge is extracted from the Ga. 71Ge is unstable with respect to electron capture (

t1/2=11.43

days) and, therefore, the amount of extracted germanium can be determined from its activity as measured in small proportional counters.

The experiment had begun to measure the solar neutrino capture rate with a target of gallium metal in December 1989 and continued to run in August 2011 with only a few brief interruptions in the timespan. As of 2013 is the experiment was described as "being continued"[1] with the latest published data from August 2011. As of 2014 it was stated that the SAGE experiment continues the once-a-month extractions.[2] The SAGE experiment continued in 2016.[3] As of 2017, the SAGE-experiment continues.[4]

The experiment has measured the solar neutrino flux in 168 extractions between January 1990 and December 2007. The result of the experiment based on the whole 1990-2007 set of data is (stat.) (syst.) SNU. This represents only 56%-60% of the capture rate predicted by different Standard Solar Models, which predict 138 SNU. The difference is in agreement with neutrino oscillations.

The collaboration has used a 518 kCi 51Cr neutrino source to test the experimental operation. The energy of these neutrinos is similar to the solar 7Be neutrinos and thus makes an ideal check on the experimental procedure. The extractions for the Cr experiment took place between January and May 1995 and the counting of the samples lasted until fall. The result, expressed in terms of a ratio of the measured production rate to the expected production rate, is . This indicates that the discrepancy between the solar model predictions and the SAGE flux measurement cannot be an experimental artifact. Also calibrations with a 37Ar neutrino source had been performed.

Baksan Experiment on Sterile Transitions (BEST)

In 2014, the SAGE-experiment's GGNT-apparatus (gallium-germanium neutrino telescope) was upgraded to perform a very-short-baseline neutrino oscillation experiment BEST (Baksan Experiment on Sterile Transitions) with an intense artificial neutrino source based on 51Cr.[5] In 2017, the BEST apparatus was completed, but the artificial neutrino source was missing.[6] As of 2018, the BEST experiment was underway.[7] As of 2018, a follow-up experiment BEST-2 where the source would be changed to 65Zn was under consideration.[8] It uses two gallium chambers instead of one, to better determine whether the anomaly could be explained by the distance from the source of the neutrinos[9]

The gallium anomaly

In June 2022, the BEST experiment released two papers observing a 20-24% deficit in the production the isotope germanium expected from the reaction

{}71Ga+\nuee-+{}71Ge

, confirming previous results from SAGE and GALLEX on the so called "gallium anomaly" pointing out that a sterile neutrino explanation can be consistent with the data.[10] [11] [12] Further work have refined the precision for the cross section of the neutrino capture in 2023[13] as well as half-life of

71Ge

in 2024[14] ruling them out as possible explanations for the anomaly.

Members of SAGE

SAGE is led by the following physicists:

See also

References

  1. 10.1134/S106377881309007X. Contribution of gallium experiments to the understanding of solar physics and neutrino physics. Physics of Atomic Nuclei. 76. 10. 1238–1243. October 2013. Gavrin. V. N.. 2013PAN....76.1238G. 122656176.
  2. Web site: Archived copy . 2018-12-15 . 2020-10-25 . https://web.archive.org/web/20201025024021/https://www.snolab.ca/sites/default/files/Chen3_EvidenceOsc.pdf . dead .
  3. Web site: Archived copy . 2019-05-31 . 2019-05-31 . https://web.archive.org/web/20190531142549/http://www.hephy.at/user/mjeitler/TALKS/Baksan_Hephy5.pdf . dead .
  4. Web site: Baksan scales new neutrino heights – CERN Courier. 19 May 2017.
  5. 10.1134/S1063779615020100. 2015PPN....46..131G. Current status of new SAGE project with 51Cr neutrino source. Physics of Particles and Nuclei. 46. 2. 131. Gavrin. V.. Cleveland. B.. Danshin. S.. Elliott. S.. Gorbachev. V.. Ibragimova. T.. Kalikhov. A.. Knodel. T.. Kozlova. Yu.. Malyshkin. Yu.. Matveev. V.. Mirmov. I.. Nico. J.. Robertson. R. G. H.. Shikhin. A.. Sinclair. D.. Veretenkin. E.. Wilkerson. J.. 2015. 1440431. 120787161 .
  6. Web site: Baksan scales new neutrino heights – CERN Courier. 19 May 2017.
  7. News: The Neutrino Trappers. The New York Times. 2018-07-16. Babenko. Maxim. Overbye. Dennis.
  8. 1807.02977. On the gallium experiment BEST-2 with a 65Zn source to search for neutrino oscillations on a short baseline. Gavrin. V. N.. Gorbachev. V. V.. Ibragimova. T. V.. Kornoukhov. V. N.. Dzhanelidze. A. A.. Zlokazov. S. B.. Kotelnikov. N. A.. Izhutov. A. L.. Mainskov. S. V.. Pimenov. V. V.. Borisenko. V. P.. Kiselev. K. B.. Tsevelev. M. P.. 2018. physics.ins-det.
  9. Web site: O'Callaghan . Jonathan . 2024-07-12 . What Could Explain the Gallium Anomaly? . 2024-07-14 . Quanta Magazine . en.
  10. Web site: Laboratory . Los Alamos National . 2022-06-18 . Deep Underground Experiment Results Confirm Anomaly: Possible New Fundamental Physics . 2022-06-22 . SciTechDaily . en-us.
  11. Barinov . V. V. . Cleveland . B. T. . Danshin . S. N. . Ejiri . H. . Elliott . S. R. . Frekers . D. . Gavrin . V. N. . Gorbachev . V. V. . Gorbunov . D. S. . Haxton . W. C. . Ibragimova . T. V. . 2022-06-09 . Results from the Baksan Experiment on Sterile Transitions (BEST) . Physical Review Letters . 128 . 23 . 232501 . 2109.11482 . 2022PhRvL.128w2501B . 10.1103/PhysRevLett.128.232501 . 35749172 . 237605431.
  12. Barinov . V. V. . Danshin . S. N. . Gavrin . V. N. . Gorbachev . V. V. . Gorbunov . D. S. . Ibragimova . T. V. . Kozlova . Yu. P. . Kravchuk . L. V. . Kuzminov . V. V. . Lubsandorzhiev . B. K. . Malyshkin . Yu. M. . 2022-06-09 . Search for electron-neutrino transitions to sterile states in the BEST experiment . Physical Review C . 105 . 6 . 065502 . 2201.07364 . 2022PhRvC.105f5502B . 10.1103/PhysRevC.105.065502 . 246035834.
  13. Elliott . S. R. . Gavrin . V. N. . Haxton . W. C. . Ibragimova . T. V. . Rule . E. J. . 2023-09-25 . Gallium neutrino absorption cross section and its uncertainty . Physical Review C . en . 108 . 3 . 10.1103/PhysRevC.108.035502 . 2469-9985. 2303.13623 .
  14. Norman . E. B. . Drobizhev . A. . Gharibyan . N. . Gregorich . K. E. . Kolomensky . Yu. G. . Sammis . B. N. . Scielzo . N. D. . Shusterman . J. A. . Thomas . K. J. . 2024-05-30 . Half-life of Ge 71 and the gallium anomaly . Physical Review C . en . 109 . 5 . 10.1103/PhysRevC.109.055501 . 2469-9985.

Literature

External links