In mathematical finance, the SABR model is a stochastic volatility model, which attempts to capture the volatility smile in derivatives markets. The name stands for "stochastic alpha, beta, rho", referring to the parameters of the model. The SABR model is widely used by practitioners in the financial industry, especially in the interest rate derivative markets. It was developed by Patrick S. Hagan, Deep Kumar, Andrew Lesniewski, and Diana Woodward.
The SABR model describes a single forward
F
F
\sigma
F
\sigma
dFt=\sigmat
\beta | |
\left(F | |
t\right) |
dWt,
d\sigma | |
t |
dZt,
with the prescribed time zero (currently observed) values
F0
\sigma0
Wt
Zt
-1<\rho<1
dWtdZt=\rhodt
The constant parameters
\beta, \alpha
0\leq\beta\leq1, \alpha\geq0
\alpha
\rho
\sigma0
\rho
\beta
\alpha
The above dynamics is a stochastic version of the CEV model with the skewness parameter
\beta
\alpha=0
\alpha
\sigma
We consider a European option (say, a call) on the forward
F
K
T
max(FT-K, 0)
Ft
Except for the special cases of
\beta=0
\beta=1
\varepsilon=T\alpha2
\sigmarm{impl
\sigma | \left\{1+\left[ | ||||
|
| \left( | |||||||||||||
24 |
\sigma0C(Fmid) | |
\alpha |
| |||||
\right) |
\sigma0C(Fmid) | |
\alpha |
+
2-3\rho2 | |
24 |
\right]\varepsilon\right\},
where, for clarity, we have set
C\left(F\right)=F\beta
Fmid
F0
K
\sqrt{F0K}
\left(F0+K\right)/2
\zeta= | \alpha |
\sigma0 |
F0 | |
\int | |
K |
dx | = | |
C(x) |
\alpha | |
\sigma0(1-\beta) |
1-\beta | |
\left(F | |
0{} |
-K1-\beta\right),
and
\gamma | = | ||||
|
\beta | |
Fmid |
,
\gamma | =- | ||||
|
\beta(1-\beta) | |
\left(Fmid\right)2 |
,
The function
D\left(\zeta\right)
D(\zeta)=log\left( | \sqrt{1-2\rho\zeta+\zeta2 |
+\zeta-\rho}{1-\rho}\right). |
Alternatively, one can express the SABR price in terms of the Bachelier's model. Then the implied normal volatility can be asymptotically computed by means of the following expression:
n | ||
\sigma | =\alpha | |
impl |
F0-K | \left\{1+\left[ | |
D(\zeta) |
| \left( | |||||||||||||
24 |
\sigma0C(Fmid) | |
\alpha |
| |||||
\right) |
\sigma0C(Fmid) | + | |
\alpha |
2-3\rho2 | |
24 |
\right]\varepsilon\right\}.
It is worth noting that the normal SABR implied volatility is generally somewhat more accurate than the lognormal implied volatility.
The approximation accuracy and the degree of arbitrage can be further improved if the equivalent volatility under the CEV model with the same
\beta
A SABR model extension for negative interest rates that has gained popularity in recent years is the shifted SABR model, where the shifted forward rate is assumed to follow a SABR process
dFt=\sigmat
\beta | |
(F | |
t+s) |
dWt,
d\sigmat=\alpha\sigmatdZt,
for some positive shift
s
The SABR model can also be modified to cover negative interest rates by:
dFt=\sigmat
\beta | |
|F | |
t| |
dWt,
d\sigmat=\alpha\sigmatdZt,
for
0\leq\beta\leq1/2
F=0
Although the asymptotic solution is very easy to implement, the density implied by the approximation is not always arbitrage-free, especially not for very low strikes (it becomes negative or the density does not integrate to one).
One possibility to "fix" the formula is use the stochastic collocation method and to project the corresponding implied, ill-posed, model on a polynomial of an arbitrage-free variables, e.g. normal. This will guarantee equality in probability at the collocation points while the generated density is arbitrage-free. Using the projection method analytic European option prices are available and the implied volatilities stay very close to those initially obtained by the asymptotic formula.
Another possibility is to rely on a fast and robust PDE solver on an equivalent expansion of the forward PDE, that preserves numerically the zero-th and first moment, thus guaranteeing the absence of arbitrage.
The SABR model can be extended by assuming its parameters to be time-dependent. This however complicates the calibration procedure. An advanced calibration method of the time-dependent SABR model is based on so-called "effective parameters".
Alternatively, Guerrero and Orlando show that a time-dependent local stochastic volatility (SLV) model can be reduced to a system of autonomous PDEs that can be solved using the heat kernel, by means of the Wei-Norman factorization method and Lie algebraic techniques. Explicit solutions obtained by said techniques are comparable to traditional Monte Carlo simulations allowing for shorter time in numerical computations.
As the stochastic volatility process follows a geometric Brownian motion, its exact simulation is straightforward. However, the simulation of the forward asset process is not a trivial task. Taylor-based simulation schemes are typically considered, like Euler–Maruyama or Milstein. Recently, novel methods have been proposed for the almost exact Monte Carlo simulation of the SABR model. Extensive studies for SABR model have recently been considered.For the normal SABR model (
\beta=0
F=0