The Rules of Sociological Method explained

The Rules of Sociological Method
Title Orig:Les Règles de la méthode sociologique
Author:Émile Durkheim
Country:France
Language:French
Subject:Sociology
Release Date:1895
Media Type:Print

The Rules of Sociological Method (French: Les Règles de la méthode sociologique) is a book by Émile Durkheim, first published in 1895. It is recognized as being the direct result of Durkheim's own project of establishing sociology as a positivist social science.[1] Durkheim is seen as one of the fathers of sociology,[2] and this work, his manifesto of sociology.[3] Durkheim distinguishes sociology from other sciences and justifies his rationale. Sociology is the science of social facts. Durkheim suggests two central theses, without which sociology would not be a science:

  1. It must have a specific object of study. Unlike philosophy or psychology, sociology's proper object of study are social facts.
  2. It must respect and apply a recognized objective scientific method, bringing it as close as possible to the other exact sciences. This method must at all cost avoid prejudice and subjective judgment.[4]

This book was one of the defining books for the new science of sociology.[5] Durkheim's argument that social sciences should be approached with the same rigorous scientific method as used in natural sciences was seen as revolutionary for the time.[5]

The Rules is seen as an important text in sociology and is a popular book on sociological theory courses. The book's meaning is still being debated by sociologists.[6] [7]

Sociology as the study of social facts

Durkheim's concern is to establish sociology as a science.[8] Arguing for a place for sociology among other sciences, he wrote, "Sociology is, then, not an auxiliary of any other science; it is itself a distinct and autonomous science."[9] To give sociology a place in the academic world and to ensure that it is a legitimate science, it must have an object that is clear and distinct from philosophy or psychology. He argued, "There is in every society a certain group of phenomena which may be differentiated from those studied by the other natural sciences."[10]

With regards to social facts, Durkheim defined them as follows:

One of the book's challenges is in showing how individual and seemingly chaotic decisions are in fact a result of a larger, more structured system, the pattern being held together by "social facts".[2]

The definition of social facts illustrates the holistic paradigm in which Durkheim's social facts are defined by two main features: they are external to and coercive to individuals.[1] They not only represent behaviour but also the rules that govern behaviour and give it meaning.[11] Social facts have been not only accepted by, but have been adopted by society as rules to which they choose to follow. Law, language, morality and marriage are all examples of ideals formed through individual thought that have manifested into these concrete institutions which we must now abide by.[12] Social facts can be constraining: if individuals do not do act as they dictate, they may face social penalties.[12] The binding nature of social facts is often implicit, because the rules of society are internalized by individuals in the process of education and socialization.[12]

Durkheim distinguished two types of social facts: normal social facts – which, within a society, occur regularly and most often – and pathological social facts – which are much less common.

Principles of sociology

According to Durkheim, sociologists, without preconceptions and prejudices, must study social facts as real, objective phenomena.[3] Durkheim wrote, "The first and most fundamental rule is: Consider social facts as things."[13] This implies that sociology must respect and apply a recognized objective, scientific method, bringing it as close as possible to the other exact sciences.[3] This method must at all cost avoid prejudice and subjective judgment.[3]

Furthermore Durkheim talks about social phenomena and how they must be studied. Durkheim wrote:

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. Book: Kate Reed. New Directions in Social Theory: Race, Gender and the Canon. 17 March 2011. 2006. SAGE. 978-0-7619-4270-2. 27–.
  2. Book: Lisa F. Berkman. Ichirō Kawachi. Social Epidemiology. 17 March 2011. 2000. Oxford University Press US. 978-0-19-508331-6. 138–.
  3. Book: Émile Durkheim. The Rules of Sociological Method. 17 March 2011. 1982. Simon and Schuster. 978-0-02-907940-9. 2–.
  4. Book: Patricia Leavy. Patricia Leavy. Method Meets Art: Arts-based Research Practice. 17 March 2011. 30 July 2008. Guilford Press. 978-1-59385-259-7. 5–.
  5. Book: Ferreol & Noreck. Introduction to Sociology. 2009 . 17 March 2011. PHI Learning Pvt. Ltd.. 978-81-203-3940-8. 12–.
  6. Book: W. S. F. Pickering. Emile Durkheim: Critical Assessments of Leading Sociologists. 17 March 2011. 2001. Taylor & Francis. 978-0-415-20562-7. 232–.
  7. Book: Michael R. Hill. Susan Hoecker-Drysdale. Harriet Martineau: Theoretical and Methodological Perspectives. 17 March 2011. 15 November 2002. Psychology Press. 978-0-415-94528-8. 80–.
  8. Book: Damian Popolo. A New Science of International Relations: Modernity, Complexity and the Kosovo Conflict. 17 March 2011. 16 January 2011. Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.. 978-1-4094-1226-7. 97–.
  9. Book: Mary C. Brinton. Victor Nee. The New Institutionalism in Sociology. 17 March 2011. 2001. Stanford University Press. 978-0-8047-4276-4. 11–.
  10. Book: Scott Appelrouth. Laura Desfor Edles. Classical and Contemporary Sociological Theory: Text and Readings. registration. 17 March 2011. 26 September 2007. Pine Forge Press. 978-0-7619-2793-8. 95–.
  11. Book: Finn Collin. Social Reality. 17 March 2011. 1 January 2002. CRC Press. 978-0-203-04792-7. 217–.
  12. Book: Peter Wallace Preston. Development Theory: An Introduction. 17 March 2011. 1996. Wiley-Blackwell. 978-0-631-19555-9. 87–.
  13. Book: Martin Hollis. The Philosophy of Social Science: An Introduction. 17 March 2011. 1994. Cambridge University Press. 978-0-521-44780-5. 99–.