Roland (missile) explained

Is Missile:yes
Roland
Type:Surface-to-air missile
Design Date:1963
Service:1977–present
Engine:Dual-thrust solid-fueled rocket:
  • Booster: "Roubaix" rocket, 15.3 kN for 1.7 s
  • Sustainer: "Lampyre" rocket, 1.96 kN for 13.2 s
Weight:67 kg
Length:2.40 m
Diameter:16 cm
Wingspan:50 cm
Speed:Mach 1.6
Vehicle Range:8,000 m
Altitude:5,500 m
Filling:6.5kg (14.3lb) pre-fragmented high-explosive
Guidance:tracking radar

The Roland is a Franco-German mobile short-range surface-to-air missile (SAM) system. The Roland was also purchased by the U.S. Army as one of very few foreign SAM systems.

Development

Roland was designed to a joint French and German requirement for a low-level mobile missile system to protect mobile field formations and fixed, high-value targets such as airfields. Development began in 1963 as a study by Nord Aviation of France and Bölkow of Germany with the system then called SABA in France and P-250 in Germany.[1] The two companies formed a joint development project in 1964 and later (as Aérospatiale of France and MBB of Germany) founded the Euromissile company for this and other missile programs. Aerospatiale took primary responsibility for the Roland 1 day/clear-weather system while MBB took primary responsibility for the Roland 2 all-weather system. Aerospatiale was also responsible for the rear and propulsion system of the missile while MBB developed the front end of the missile with warhead and guidance systems. The first guided launch of a Roland prototype took place in June 1968, destroying a Nord Aviation CT20 target drone and fielding of production systems was expected from January 1970. The test and evaluation phase took much longer than originally anticipated with the clear-weather Roland I finally entering operational service with the French Army in April 1977, while the all-weather Roland II was first fielded by the German Army in 1978 followed by the French Army in 1981.[1] The long delays and ever-increasing costs combined with inflation meant Roland was never procured in the numbers originally anticipated.

Variants

The Roland SAM system was designed to engage enemy air targets flying at speeds of up to Mach 1.3 at altitudes between 20 meters and 5,500 meters with a minimum effective range of 500 meters and a maximum of 6,300 meters. The system can operate in optical or radar mode and can switch between these modes during an engagement. A pulse-doppler search radar with a range of 15–18 km detects the target which can then be tracked either by the tracking radar or an optical tracker. The optical channel would normally be employed only in daylight against very low-level targets or in a heavy jamming environment.[2]

The Roland missile is a two-stage solid propellant unit 2.4 meters long with a weight of 66.5 kg including the 6.5 kg multiple hollow-charge fragmentation warhead which contains 3.5 kg of explosive detonated by impact or proximity fuses. The 65 projectile charges have a lethal radius of 6 meters. Cruising speed is Mach 1.6. The missile is delivered in a sealed container which is also the launch tube. Each launcher carries two launch tubes with 8 more inside the vehicle or shelter with automatic reloading in 10 seconds.

For defense of fixed sites such as airfields the shelter Roland can be integrated in the CORAD (Co-ordinated Roland Air Defense) system which can include a surveillance radar, a Roland Co-ordination Center, 8 Roland fire units and up to 8 guns.[2]

Fire units

Missile variants

Roland 1/2 : The initial missile for the Roland system, entering production in 1977. Roland has a speed of 550 m/s and a range of 6.2 km. Roland 1 and 2 missiles have identical statistics but differ in tracking modes, Roland 1 being optically tracked, while Roland 2 missiles incorporate a continuous wave beacon to allow automatic radar tracking.[9]
  • : An upgraded missile which entered production in 1988 with speed increased from 550 m/s to 620 m/s and range increased from 6.3 to 8.5 km with maximum effective altitude increased to 6,000 m. Warhead size is also increased to 9.1 kg with 84 hollow-charges. Response time for the first target is quoted as 6–8 seconds with 2–6 seconds for subsequent targets. The Roland 3 missile can be used by all Roland systems.
  • : This was a joint project between the then Matra and Aerospatiale of France and MBB of Germany begun in 1987 for a missile with increased speed and range. RM5 was designed to achieve speeds of 1,600 m/s (Mach 5.0) with the range increased to 10 km. The RM5 warhead had an 11 kg warhead with dual detonation modes, able to produce either large, high energy fragments for use against armoured targets, or larger numbers of smaller fragments for use against small targets. The companies had committed to only the preliminary design phase and when Germany and France opted not to fund full scale development in 1991 development of RM-5 ceased.
  • VT1 : In September 1991 Euromissile and the then Thomson CSF (now Thales Group) agreed to integrate the VT1 missile of the Crotale NG system into the Roland 3 system with retrofitting of French and German Roland fire units from 1996. Thales subsequently revoked the Euromissile license, but was ordered to pay Euromissile $109m in a subsequent court case.[10]
  • : HFK/KV was a BGT proposed alternative to VT1. It was a hypersonic missile with a speed of over Mach 5, intended to reach maximum range of 12 km in only 60% of the time taken by VT1. Guidance was to be inertial with terminal infra-red homing.
  • Current systems are capable of launching Roland 2, Roland 3 or VT1 missiles. Roland's latest upgraded versions have limited ability to counter incoming low radar cross-section munitions (large-caliber heavyweight rockets).

    Carriers

    The Roland system has been installed on a variety of platforms, amongst them:

    Tracked
    Wheeled

    Roland 2 was proposed in the early 1980s for installation on the Leopard 1 tank chassis, probably to meet an expected Dutch army requirement but was never built. In configuration it would have been very similar to the AMX-30R.

    American Roland on the M109 chassis was built in prototype form but production systems were rather hastily installed on 6×6 flatbed trucks. In the late 1980s there was an attempt to revive the American Roland program with the Paladin submission to the U.S. Army's LOS-F-H (Line Of Sight - Forward - Heavy) battlefield air defense program. This new version of the American Roland system would have used the existing XM975 vehicle for testing & evaluation purposes, with production systems being fitted on a new modified M2 Bradley chassis.[11]

    An airliftable shelter named Roland CAROL has also been developed, which is a 7.8t container that can be deployed on the ground to protect fixed assets like airfields or depots or fitted on an ACMAT truck.

    Users

    Combat use

    On 1 June 1982, during the Falklands War, Sea Harrier XZ456 was destroyed south of Stanley, by a Roland launched by members of the Argentine Army's GADA 601 (601st AA Artillery Group).[16] The launcher, one of four examples delivered to Argentina, was later captured in fairly intact condition by the British around Port Stanley after the surrender. It was taken back to Britain as a valuable prize and studied in detail.

    At around 11:00 pm on 17 January 1991, an A-6E TRAM Intruder from VA-35, AA-510 (BuNo 161668), crewed by Lt. Bob Wetzel and Lt. Jeff Zaun was attacked by two Rolands while attacking the H-3 Airfield in Western Iraq. The Roland did not set off the American-built RWRs, meaning that it was hard to detect. After evading the first Roland, another one (which the crew didn't see), impacted the aircraft. The crew successfully ejected but were soon captured.[17] On 19 January 1991, during the Gulf War a RAF Panavia Tornado GR.1 ZA396/GE, on a SEAD mission against the Iraqi air base at Tallil, was destroyed by a Roland. Both crew members ejected successfully, were taken prisoner and survived the war. The destruction of at least one USAF A-10 Thunderbolt, which occurred at around the same time, was later attributed to a Roland,[18] by the Pentagon.

    Rolandgate

    In October 2003, controversy erupted between Poland and France when Polish forces from the Multinational force in Iraq found four French Roland surface-to-air missiles.[19] [20] Polish and international press reported that Polish officers claimed these missiles had been manufactured in 2003.[20] France pointed out that it had never sold weapons to Iraq after July 1990 in violation of the embargo.[20] Polish authorities would later remark that the four missiles were manufactured in 1984, and that the 2003 date was the last time when Iraqi personnel had serviced them.[19] Investigations by the Polish authorities came to the conclusion that the persons responsible for the scandal were low level commanders. Wojskowe Służby Informacyjne, the Polish Army's intelligence unit, had not verified their claims before they were leaked to the press. Poland apologized to France for the scandal, but these allegations against France worsened the already somewhat strained relationships between the two countries. The entire incident was sarcastically called "Rolandgate" by the Polish media, using the unofficial naming conventions of US political scandals after Watergate.

    Operators

    Current operators

    Former operators

    See also

    Sources

    Notes and References

    1. Gunston
    2. Jane's Armour and Artillery
    3. National Defense University Washington DC Research Directorate . Malone,Daniel K . May 1980 . Roland: A Case for or Against NATO Standardization? . https://web.archive.org/web/20170320143508/http://www.dtic.mil/get-tr-doc/pdf?AD=ADA084881 . dead . March 20, 2017 . . 19 March 2017 .
    4. Fast . Richard Charles . . July 1981 . The Politics of Weapons Standardization in NATO . Ph.D. . . https://web.archive.org/web/20170320052849/http://www.dtic.mil/get-tr-doc/pdf?AD=ADA119414 . dead . March 20, 2017 . 19 March 2017.
    5. ForecastInternational
    6. Web site: ROLAND-LVB. A.Schieb. Flarakgrp42.de. 11 April 2018.
    7. Web site: Successful Conclusion of Roland NDV Official Troop Trials. Defense-aerospace.com. 11 April 2018.
    8. Web site: Archived copy . 2017-06-18 . https://web.archive.org/web/20171013172306/https://www.forecastinternational.com/archive/disp_old_pdf.cfm?ARC_ID=1097 . 2017-10-13 . dead.
    9. Web site: Air-defence missile systems . Flightglobal.com. 15 March 2019.
    10. Web site: Thales challenges court's licensing decision. 19 November 2002. flightglobal.com. 11 April 2018.
    11. Babbitt, Bettina A. . Muckler, Frederick A. . Seven, Sally A. . Human Factors Performance Data for Future Forward Area Air Defense Systems (FAADS) [Final Report October 1986-December 1987] ]. https://web.archive.org/web/20170320052632/http://www.dtic.mil/get-tr-doc/pdf?AD=ADA210425 . dead . March 20, 2017 . . June 1989 .
    12. Jane's Land Based Air Defense
    13. Army Technology
    14. Book: David H. S. Morgan. Hostile Skies: The Falklands Conflict Through the Eyes of a Sea Harrier Pilot. 2006. Weidenfeld & Nicolson. 978-0-297-84645-1. 200–201.
    15. News: French connection armed Saddam. 8 September 2004. The Washington Times. 11 April 2018.
    16. Smith, Gordon: Battle Atlas of the Falklands War 1982. Lulu.com, 2006, page 97. .
    17. Book: Morgan, Rick. A-6 Intruder Units: 1974-1996. Osprey Publishing. 2017.
    18. News: French connection armed Saddam. The Washington Times. 11 April 2018.
    19. News: Stylinski. Andrzej. Poland says French missiles found in Iraq were made in 1984. https://web.archive.org/web/20150924182427/http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-85825809.html. dead. 24 September 2015. Associated Press. 16 October 2003. 22 August 2015.
    20. Web site: Pasek. Beata. Poland retracts charge that new French missiles found in Iraq after French denials. https://web.archive.org/web/20150924182422/http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P1-85398244.html. dead. 24 September 2015. Associated Press. 4 October 2003.
    21. Book: Debay, Yves. Operation Iraqi Freedom: Victory in Baghdad. Yves Debay. Concord Publication. 962-361-067-X. 2003. Special Obs 27. 39.
    22. Web site: Forecast International: Intelligence Center.
    23. Web site: Na Hrvaškem uničili slovenske rakete zemlja-zrak, Slovenija brez učinkovite protizračne obrambe. 28 January 2018. Insajder.com - Objektivno. Odkrito. Točno.. 15 March 2019.