Robert Y. Thornton | |
Birth Date: | January 28, 1910 |
Birth Place: | Portland, Oregon |
Death Place: | Salem, Oregon[1] |
Office: | Judge on the Oregon Court of Appeals |
Term Start: | 1971 |
Term End: | 1983 |
Predecessor: | Edward H. Branchfield |
Successor: | Jonathan Uhry Newman |
Office2: | Oregon Attorney General |
Term Start2: | January 5, 1953 |
Term End2: | May 20, 1969 |
Governor2: | Paul L. Patterson Elmo Smith Robert D. Holmes Mark Hatfield Tom McCall |
Predecessor2: | George Neuner (R) |
Successor2: | Lee Johnson (R) |
Office3: | Oregon State Representative 3rd District, Tillamook |
Term Start3: | 1951 |
Term End3: | 1953 |
Predecessor3: | Edward A. Geary (R) |
Successor3: | Harry C. Elliott (R) |
Party: | Democratic |
Occupation: | Attorney, Jurist |
Spouse: | Dorothy Marie Haberbach |
Children: | 1 son |
Robert Y. Thornton (January 28, 1910 – November 29, 2003) was an American attorney, politician, and jurist in the U.S. state of Oregon.[2] A Democrat, he was the second-longest serving Oregon Attorney General in the state's history, holding that office from 1953 to 1969. His 16-year tenure was second only to Republican Isaac Homer Van Winkle, who bested him by seven years, serving from 1920 to 1943.[3] Thornton was the Democratic nominee for Oregon Governor in 1962, losing in the general election to incumbent Mark Hatfield.[4]
His ultimate defeat by Republican Lee Johnson, who garnered some 80,000 more votes than Thornton in the 1968 general election, became a matter for the courts. Thornton challenged the outcome by bringing a suit charging that Johnson had violated campaign spending limits and falsified a report by signing the blank form. Johnson admitted he had done so in anticipation of being out of the country when the report was to be filed. A three-judge panel in Marion County ruled in favor of Thornton, invalidating the election results and awarding Thornton an additional term. The Oregon Supreme Court overturned that decision and awarded the office to Johnson, on the grounds that neither violation was deliberate and that both had occurred after the election.[3]