Robert P. Crease Explained

Fetchwikidata:ALL
Dateformat:dmi

Robert P. Crease (; born 22 October 1953 in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) is a philosopher and historian of science best known for his work in performance theory and historical research on Brookhaven National Laboratory. He is currently the chairman of the Department of Philosophy at Stony Brook University.

Career

Crease is co-editor of the scholarly journal Physics in Perspective and writes a monthly column, "Critical Point", for the international physics magazine Physics World.[1] In philosophy his interests lie in performance theory, expertise, and trust. In history of science his interest focuses on the history of Brookhaven National Laboratory, one of the first three U.S. national laboratories; he is co-founder of the Laboratory History conferences which have been held bi-annually since 1999. In 2007 he was elected a Fellow of the American Physical Society (APS) in the United States,[2] and of the Institute of Physics (IOP) in London.

He has written, co-written, translated, or edited over a dozen books. His articles have appeared in The Atlantic, The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, and other periodicals.

History of science

Crease began to work on the history of Brookhaven National Laboratory shortly after arriving at Stony Brook in 1987. Brookhaven, established in 1947 and the site of several Nobel-prizewinning work, was among the first three U.S. National Laboratories. Due to its scientific ambitions and geographical location (not far from New York City), Brookhaven has experienced the tensions and conflicts affecting U.S. science-society relations in general. These tensions and conflicts affect the management of science, science policy, the construction of large scientific facilities, and environmental concerns and community trust. Crease has written about the history of Brookhaven's first quarter-century in Making Physics: A Biography of Brookhaven National Laboratory (University of Chicago Press, 1999).

His articles about Brookhaven include:

Performance theory

In performance theory Crease treats performance not as merely a praxis – an application of a skill, technique, or practice that simply produces what it does – but a poiesis; a bringing forth of a phenomenon, something with its own identity in the world, able to appear in different ways in different circumstances, but exhibiting some lawlike integrity. Works of the performing arts are clearly of this sort – but so are scientific experiments. An experiment is not something automatic, but must be planned, executed, and witnessed – and its result sometimes leads the planners to have to alter an experiment so that what appears in it can be seen more clearly.

Crease treats performance as not simply a metaphor that is extended merely suggestively from the arts to the sciences, but as something that happens alike in artistic and scientific activity. Treating experiments as performances in the service of inquiry, however, leads us to understand better several features of experiments, such as why they can "give us back" more information than we put into them, causing us to reshape the theories that led us to create them.

Relevant publications include:

Select publications

Books

Articles

References

  1. Web site: Robert P. Crease, Author at Physics World . Physics World . 2019-10-16 .
  2. Web site: APS Fellow Archive . American Physical Society . Crease, Robert [2007], State University of New York, Stony Brook. Citation: For his extensive historical writings on physics, including "The Second Creation", "Making Science: A Biography of Brookhaven National Laboratory" and his completion of Robert Serber's memoirs and Abraham Pais' biography of J. Robert Oppenheimer. Nominated by: Forum on the History of Physics .
  3. Crease . Robert P. . The National Synchrotron Light Source, Part I: Bright Idea . Physics in Perspective . 10 . 4 . 2008 . 1422-6944 . 10.1007/s00016-007-0357-z . 438–467.
  4. Crease . Robert P. . The National Synchrotron Light Source, Part II:The Bakeout . Physics in Perspective . 11 . 1 . 2009 . 1422-6944 . 10.1007/s00016-007-0358-y . 15–45.
  5. Crease . Robert P. . Recombinant Science: The Birth of the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider (RHIC) . Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences . 38 . 4 . 1 November 2008 . 1939-1811 . 10.1525/hsns.2008.38.4.535 . 535–568.
  6. Crease . Robert P. . Inquiry and performance: analogies and identities between the arts and the sciences . Interdisciplinary Science Reviews . 28 . 4 . 2003 . 0308-0188 . 10.1179/030801803225008668 . 266–272.
  7. Web site: The Workshop and the World: What Ten Thinkers Can Teach Us About Science and Authority. www.publishersweekly.com. 2019-05-11.
  8. Crease. Robert P.. 2019-03-18. The rise and fall of scientific authority — and how to bring it back. Nature. 567. 7748. 309–310. 10.1038/d41586-019-00872-w. 2019Natur.567..309C. free.
  9. Review of World in the Balance by R. P. Crease. Shapin, Steven. Steven Shapin. London Review of Books. 34. 16. 30 August 2012. 8–10.
  10. Web site: Review of World in the Balance by R. P. Crease. Kirkus Reviews (posted online 18 October 2011).
  11. Web site: Latulippe, Christian. 19 July 2010. Review of The Great Equations by R. P. Crease. MAA Reviews, Mathematical Association of America.
  12. Gregory, Andrew. Review of The Great Equations by R. P. Crease. September 2010. Isis. 101. 3. 626–627. 10.1086/657178.
  13. Web site: Review of The Great Equations by R. P. Crease. Publishers Weekly. 6 October 2008.
  14. Web site: Review of Making Physics: A Biography of Brookhaven National Laboratory,1947-1972 by R. P. Crease. Kirkus Reviews Issue: March 1st 1999.