Robert Bridges's theory of elision is a theory of elision developed by the poet Robert Bridges, while he was working on a prosodic analysis of John Milton's poems Paradise Lost, Paradise Regained, and Samson Agonistes. Bridges describes his theory in thorough detail in his 1921 book Milton's Prosody. With his definition of poetic elision, Bridges is able to demonstrate that no line in Paradise Lost contains an extra unmetrical syllable mid-line; that is, any apparent extra mid-line syllable can be explained as an example of Bridges's elision.
Bridges identifies the following kinds of elision:
Bridges identifies two basic types of vowel elision
Bridges identifies three situations where this could occur:
Bridges identifies three situations where this could occur:
Bridges identifies several places where Milton apparently glides through a consonantal H. For example:
For still they knew, and ought to have still remembered (X.12)
In Gems and wanton dress; to the Harp they sing (XI.579)
Bridges identifies that words such as schism, prism, chasm, spasm are usually counted as monosyllables, despite the fact that in spoken language we vocalize the m separately; that is, as though prism were written pris'm.
Bridges states that if two unstressed syllables are separated by an r then there may be elision.
Bridges states that if two unstressed syllables are separated by an l then there may be elision.
Bridges states that if two unstressed syllables are separated by an n then there may be elision.
Bridges notes that the Milton's concept of elision is broadened in Paradise Regained and Samson Agonistes. Specifically, he observes the following types of elision:
These last two, Bridges describes as "quite abhorrent to the style of Paradise Lost"