Rio scale explained

The Rio scale was proposed in 2000 as a means of quantifying the significance of a SETI detection.[1] [2] The scale was designed by Iván Almár and Jill Tarter to help tell policy-makers how likely, from 0 to 10, it is that an extraterrestrial radio signal has been produced by an intelligent civilization.[3]

The scale is inspired by the Torino scale, which is used to determine the impact risk associated with near-Earth objects. Just as the Torino scale takes into account how significant an object's impact on the planet would be, the Rio scale takes into account how much a public announcement of the discovery of extraterrestrial intelligence would probably impact society.

The IAA SETI Permanent Study Group officially adopted the Rio scale as a way of bringing perspective to claims of extraterrestrial intelligence (ETI) detection, and as an acknowledgement that even false ETI detections may have disastrous consequences.[4] [5]

The scale was modified in 2011 to include a consideration of whether contact was achieved through an interstellar message or a physical extraterrestrial artifact, including all indications of intelligent extraterrestrial life such as technosignatures.[6] A 2.0 version of the scale was proposed in 2018.[7] [8]

Calculation

In its 2.0 version, the Rio Scale, R, of a given event is calculated as the product of two terms.[9]

R=Q\delta

The first term, Q, is the significance of the consequences of an event. It is determined considering three factors: the estimated distance to the source of the signal (a value between 0 and 4), the prospects for communicating with the source (a value between 0 and 4) and how likely is that the sender is aware of humanity (a value between -1 and 2). The value of each factor is determined by answering a question and Q is calculated by summing the three values.

The second term, δ, is the probability that the event actually occurred. Its value is determined by first calculating a term, J, based on three factors: the probability that the signal is real, the probability that it is not instrumental, and the probability that it is not natural or human-made. The values for these factors are determined by answering a questionnaire and J is calculated by summing them. δ is then calculated using the formula .

The final R value, going from 0 to 10, is the likelihood that the observed event was produced by an intelligent civilization.

Rating scale

Rio value Importance
10 Extraordinary
9 Outstanding
8 Far-reaching
7 High
6 Noteworthy
5 Intermediate
4 Moderate
3 Minor
2 Low
1 Insignificant
0 Nil

See also

Notes and References

  1. Web site: The Rio Scale .
  2. Arbesman . Samuel . Quantifying Alien Encounters: The Rio Scale . en-US . Wired . 2022-05-30 . 1059-1028.
  3. Web site: Bartels, SPACE.com . Meghan . To Fight Fake News, SETI Researchers Update Alien-Detection Scale . 2022-05-30 . Scientific American . en.
  4. Web site: How can you tell if that ET story is real? St Andrews scientists revise the Rio Scale for alien encounters .
  5. Web site: Hall . Shannon . Strange signals from 234 stars could be ET - or human error . 2022-05-30 . New Scientist . en-US.
  6. Web site: Mike Wall . 2016-10-28 . Mysterious Star Pulses May Be Alien Signals, Study Claims . 2022-05-30 . Space.com . en.
  7. News: Tudhope . Christine . Scientists revise the Rio Scale for reported alien encounters . 18 September 2022 . phys.org . phys-20 . en.
  8. News: Bartels . Meghan . SETI Researchers Want to End the Alien-Detection Hype . 18 September 2022 . Space.com . 31 July 2018 . spacecom-20 . en.
  9. Forgan . Duncan . Wright . Jason . Tarter . Jill . Korpela . Eric . Siemion . Andrew . Almár . Iván . Piotelat . Elisabeth . Rio 2.0: revising the Rio scale for SETI detections . International Journal of Astrobiology . August 2019 . 18 . 4 . 336–344 . 10.1017/S1473550418000162. 2019IJAsB..18..336F . 10023/16927 . free .