Right to Strike under ILO Convention No. 87 explained

Right to Strike under ILO Convention No. 87
Full Name:Right to Strike under ILO Convention No. 87 (Request for Advisory Opinion)
Court:International Court of Justice
Date Decided:Pending

The Right to Strike under ILO Convention No. 87 is a pending case before the International Court of Justice brought by the International Labour Organization (ILO) in November 2023.

Background

Starting in 2012, employer representatives refused to recognize the right to strike as a corollary of the right to collective bargaining, as codified in International Labour Convention 98.[1] [2] This refusal led to the ILO's supervisory functions, in particular the Committee of Experts, ceasing to operate properly for more than a decade. As the ILO's tripartite constituents (governments, employers and trade unions) were unable to resolve how to interpret the right to strike, the governing body voted to seek the opinion of the ICJ. Article 37 of the ILO's constituion provides for this mechanism when conventions are in dispute.[3]

As of June 2024, 31 submissions had been received concerning the case.[4]

Notes and References

  1. Vogt . Jeffrey S . 2016-01-02 . The Right to Strike and the International Labour Organisation (ILO) . King's Law Journal . en . 27 . 1 . 110–131 . 10.1080/09615768.2016.1148297 . 0961-5768.
  2. Web site: 2023-11-11 . ILO refers dispute on the right to strike to the International Court of Justice International Labour Organization . 2024-08-08 . www.ilo.org . en.
  3. Web site: 12 November 2023 . ILO to refer dispute over right to strike to International Court of Justice . 2024-08-08 . Business & Human Rights Resource Centre . en.
  4. Web site: 2024-06-19 . ICJ announces 31 written statements filed in right to strike case . 2024-08-08 . www.jurist.org . en-US.