South Asian riddles explained

Riddles have at times been an important literary or folk-literary form in South Asia. Indeed, it is thought that the world's earliest surviving poetic riddles are those found in the Sanskrit Rigveda.[1] [2]

Terminology

According to Richard Salomon, "the Sanskrit term that most closely corresponds to the English 'riddle', and which is usually translated thereby, is prahelikā—a term that is not only of uncertain etymology but is also subject to widely differing interpretations and classifications."[3]

In Tamil, riddles are called Vidukathai. They circulate in both folk and literary forms.[4]

Sanskrit

According to Ludwik Sternbach,

Sanskrit riddles had to be composed in verse, preferably in four pāda-s but no more than eight pāda-s. Their solution had to be based on clear language and no obscene meaning could ever be suggested in treatises of poetics and other classical sources... They were usually difficult to solve and therefore required commentaries: they were real intelligence tests and they required from the receiver of the riddle not only wit and cleverness, but also thorough knowledge of mythology, grammar, rhetorics (including knowledge of, at least, the basic alakāra-literature), phonetics, metrics, mathematics, languages and, in particular, a vast knowledge of Sanskrit vocabulary.

Hymn 164 of the first book of the Rigveda can be understood to comprise a series of riddles or enigmas[5] which are now obscure but may have been an enigmatic exposition of the pravargya ritual.[6] These riddles overlap in significant part with a collection of forty-seven in the Atharvaveda; riddles also appear elsewhere in Vedic texts.[7] [8] According to Archer Taylor,

The highly sophisticated quality of many Sanskrit riddles can perhaps be adequately illustrated by one rather simple example ... "Who moves in the air? Who makes a noise on seeing a thief? Who is the enemy of lotuses? Who is the climax of fury?" The answers to the first three questions, when combined in the manner of a charade, yield the answer to the fourth question. The first answer is bird (vi), the second dog (çva), the third sun (mitra), and the whole is Viçvamitra, Rama's first teacher and counselor and a man noted for his outbursts of rage.[9]

Accordingly, riddles are treated in early studies of Sanskrit poetry such as Daṇḍin's seventh- or eighth-century Kāvyādarśa (iii.96-124),[10] the Kāvyālaṃkāra of Bhāmaha (c. 700), or the fifteenth-century Sāhityadarpaṇa by Viśwanātha Kaviraja.[11] Thus, for example, Daṇḍin cites this as an example of a name-riddle (nāmaprahelikā): "A city, five letters, the middle one is a nasal, the ruling lineage of which is an eight-letter word" (the answer being Kāñcī, ruled by the Pallavāḥ dynasty).[12]

Early narrative literature also sometimes includes riddles. The Mahabharata also portrays riddle-contests and includes riddles accordingly.[13] [14] For example, this portrays Yaksha Prashna, a series of riddles posed by a nature-spirit (yaksha) to Yudhishthira,[13] and, in the third book, the story of Ashtavakra. Ashtavakra is the son of one Kahoda, who loses a wisdom-contest to Bandin and is drowned in consequence. Though only a boy, Ashtavakra goes to the court of King Janaka to seek revenge on Bandin. On arrival, he is presented with a series of riddles by Janaka, starting with the widespread year-riddle: what has six naves, twelve axles, twenty-four joints, and three hundred and sixty spokes? (The year.) Janaka then asks a mythic riddle about thunder and lightning, and then a series of simpler, paradox-based riddles like 'what does not close its eye when asleep?' Having won Janaka's approval, Ashtavakra goes on to defeat Bandin in a further wisdom-contest, and has Bandin drowned.[15] Meanwhile, Baital Pachisi (Tales of a Vetala), originating before the twelfth century CE, features twenty four tales, each culminating in a riddle or similar puzzle. Unusually, the challenge here is for the hero to not solve a riddle.[16]

Sanskrit riddles continued to be produced and collected through the Middle Ages. Most collections have yet to be edited, but one major one was the Vidagdhamukhamaṇḍana, and an initial catalogue of this and others is provided by Ludwik Sternbach.

Medieval Indic languages

See also: Riddles of Amir Khusrow. The first riddle collection in a medieval Indic language is traditionally thought to be by Amir Khusro (1253–1325), though it is debated whether he actually composed the collection.[17] If he did, he wrote his riddles in the Indic language he called Hindawi rather than his usual Persian. The collection contains 286 riddles, divided into six groups, "apparently on the basis of the structure of the riddle and the structure of the answer"; "these riddles are 'in the style of the common people', but most scholars believe they were composed by Khusro".[18] The riddles are in Mātrika metre; one example is:

The emboldened text here indicates a clue woven into the text: it is a pun on nadi ("river").

Modern riddles

A noted semi-legendary Dogri language riddler in nineteenth-century India was the carpenter Kavi-Lakkhu (C17 or C18)[19] or Duggar Lakkhu (c. 1750-1840).[20] [21]

They circulate in both folk and literary forms.[22] Tamil riddles include descriptive, question, rhyming and entertaining riddles.[23]

Riddles are mostly found in oral form. The structure resembles folk songs. Most of the riddles are based on the living things and objects around in day-to-day life. A sample riddle is given below.[24]

Collections

As of the 1970s, folklorists had not undertaken extensive collecting of riddles in India, but a fairly substantial corpus had nonetheless been accrued.[25] Collections include:

Notes and References

  1. A. A. Seyeb-Gohrab, Courtly Riddles: Enigmatic Embellishments in Early Persian Poetry (Leiden: Leiden University Press, 2010), 14.
  2. L. Sternbach, Indian Riddles: A Forgotten Chapter in the History of Sanskrit Literature, Vishveshvaranand Indological Series, 67/Vishveshvaranand Institute Publications, 632 (Hoshiarpur: Vishveshvaranand Vedic Research Institute, 1975).
  3. Richard Salomon, "When is a Riddle not a Riddle? Some Comments on Riddling and Related Poetic Devices in Classical Sanskrit", in Untying the Knot: On Riddles and Other Enigmatic Modes, ed. by Galit Hasan-Rokem and David Shulman (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1996), pp. 168–78 (p. 168).
  4. Web site: Folklore – An Introduction. Tamil Virtual University. 4 December 2014.
  5. Martin Haug, "Vedische Räthselfragen und Räthselsprüche (Uebersetzung und Erklärung von Rigv. 1, 164)", Sitzungsberichte der philosophisch-philologischen und historischen Classe der Köngl. bayerischen Akademie der Wissenschaften zu München (1875), 457–515.
  6. Jan E. M. Houben, "The Ritual Pragmatics of a Vedic Hymn: The 'Riddle Hymn' and the Pravargya Ritual", Journal of the American Oriental Society, 120 (2000), 499–536 (English translation pp. 533–36), . .
  7. Archer Taylor, The Literary Riddle before 1600 (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1948), pp. 13–17.
  8. See also J. Huizinga, Homo Ludens: Proeve eener bepaling van het spel-element der cultuur (Haarlem, 1940), pp. 154ff.
  9. Archer Taylor, The Literary Riddle before 1600 (Berkeley, CA: University of California Press, 1948), pp. 16–17, citing A. Führer, "Sanskrit-Räthsel", Zeitschrift der Deutschen morgenländischen Gesellschaft, 39 (1885), 99–100.
  10. Śrīmad-ācārya-Daṇḍi-viracitaḥ Kāvyādarśaḥ/Kāvyādarśa of Daṇḍin: Sanskrit text and English translation. Ed. and trans. S. K. Belvalkar. Poona: Oriental Book-Supplying Agency, 1924. Pp. 70-74.
  11. Prakash Vatuk . Ved . 1969 . Amir Khusro and Indian Riddle Tradition . The Journal of American Folklore . 82 . 324 . 142–54 [142] . 10.2307/539075 . 539075. citing Durga Bhagwat, The Riddle in Indian Life, Lore and Literature (Bombay, 1965), 5-9.
  12. Bronner . Yigal . 2012 . A Question of Priority: Revisiting the Bhamaha-Daṇḍin Debate . The Journal of Indian Philosophy . 40 . 1 . 67–118 [76] . 10.1007/s10781-011-9128-x . 43496624 . Citing Kāvyādarśa 3.114.
  13. Annikki Kaivola-Bregenhøj, Riddles: Perspectives on the Use, Function, and Change in a Folklore Genre, Studia Fennica, Folkloristica, 10 (Helsinki: Finnish Literature Society, 2001), pp. 11–12; .
  14. Iwona Milewska, 'Duels of Words and Images: The Mahābhārata as a Treasure-House of Riddles', in Texts of Power, the Power of the Text: Readings in Textual Authority Across History and Cultures, ed. by Cezary Galewicz (Krakow: Wydawnictwo Homini, 2006), pp. 273ff.
  15. Ioannis M. Konstantakos, "Trial by Riddle: The Testing of the Counsellor and the Contest of Kings in the Legend of Amasis and Bias", Classica et Mediaevalia, 55 (2004), 85–137 (pp. 111–13).
  16. Christine Goldberg, Turandot's Sisters: A Study of the Folktale AT 851, Garland Folklore Library, 7 (New York: Garland, 1993), p. 25.
  17. Annemarie Schimmel, Classical Urdu Literature from the Beginning to Iqbāl, A History of Indian Literature, 8 (Harrassowitz: Wiesbaden, 1975), p. 129.
  18. Prakash Vatuk . Ved . 1969 . Amir Khusro and Indian Riddle Tradition . The Journal of American Folklore . 82 . 324 . 142–54 [144, 143] . 10.2307/539075 . 539075.
  19. Desh Bandhu Dogra 'Nutan', 'Dogri', in Medieval Indian Literature: Surveys and Selections. Volume 1, ed. by K. Ayyappa Paniker (New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi, 1997), pp. 70-89 (p. 89); .
  20. in Medieval Indian Literature: Surveys and Selections. Volume 1, ed. by K. Ayyappa Paniker (New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi, 1997), pp. 720-27
  21. Shivanath, 'Modern Dogri Literature', in Modern Indian Literature, an Anthology: Volume One, Surveys and Poems, ed. by K. M. George (New Delhi: Sahitya Akademi, 1992), pp. 95-106 (pp. 95-96); .
  22. Web site: Folklore – An Introduction. Tamil Virtual University. 4 December 2014.
  23. Web site: Shanthi . G. . December 1993 . Tamil riddles . 4 December 2014 . International Institute of Tamil Studies.
  24. Dieter B. Kapp. 1994. A Collection of Jaffna Tamil Riddles from Oral Tradition. Asian Folklore Studies. Nanzan Institute for Religion & Culture. 53. 1. 125–149. 10.2307/1178562. 1178562. 4 December 2014.
  25. Alan Dundes and Ved Prakash Vatuk, 'Some Characteristic Meters of Hindi Riddle Prosody', Asian Folklore Studies, 33.1 (1974), 85–153.