Reuse of human excreta explained

Reuse of human excreta is the safe, beneficial use of treated human excreta after applying suitable treatment steps and risk management approaches that are customized for the intended reuse application. Beneficial uses of the treated excreta may focus on using the plant-available nutrients (mainly nitrogen, phosphorus and potassium) that are contained in the treated excreta. They may also make use of the organic matter and energy contained in the excreta. To a lesser extent, reuse of the excreta's water content might also take place, although this is better known as water reclamation from municipal wastewater. The intended reuse applications for the nutrient content may include: soil conditioner or fertilizer in agriculture or horticultural activities. Other reuse applications, which focus more on the organic matter content of the excreta, include use as a fuel source or as an energy source in the form of biogas.

There is a large and growing number of treatment options to make excreta safe and manageable for the intended reuse option. Options include urine diversion and dehydration of feces (urine-diverting dry toilets), composting (composting toilets or external composting processes), sewage sludge treatment technologies and a range of fecal sludge treatment processes. They all achieve various degrees of pathogen removal and reduction in water content for easier handling. Pathogens of concern are enteric bacteria, virus, protozoa, and helminth eggs in feces.[1] As the helminth eggs are the pathogens that are the most difficult to destroy with treatment processes, they are commonly used as an indicator organism in reuse schemes. Other health risks and environmental pollution aspects that need to be considered include spreading micropollutants, pharmaceutical residues and nitrate in the environment which could cause groundwater pollution and thus potentially affect drinking water quality.

There are several "human excreta derived fertilizers" which vary in their properties and fertilizing characteristics, for example: urine, dried feces, composted feces, fecal sludge, sewage, sewage sludge.

The nutrients and organic matter which are contained in human excreta or in domestic wastewater (sewage) have been used in agriculture in many countries for centuries. However, this practice is often carried out in an unregulated and unsafe manner in developing countries. World Health Organization Guidelines from 2006 have set up a framework describing how this reuse can be done safely by following a "multiple barrier approach".[2] Such barriers might be selecting a suitable crop, farming methods, methods of applying the fertilizer and education of the farmers.

Terminology

Human excreta, fecal sludge and wastewater are often referred to as wastes (see also human waste). Within the concept of a circular economy in sanitation, an alternative term that is being used is "resource flows". The final outputs from the sanitation treatment systems can be called "reuse products" or "other outputs". These reuse products are general fertilizers, soil conditioners, biomass, water, or energy. Reuse of human excreta focuses on the nutrient and organic matter content of human excreta unlike reuse of wastewater which focuses on the water content. An alternative term is "use of human excreta" rather than "reuse" as strictly speaking it is the first use of human excreta, not the second time that it is used.[2]

Technologies and approaches

The resources available in wastewater and human excreta include water, plant nutrients, organic matter and energy content. Sanitation systems that are designed for safe and effective recovery of resources can play an important role in a community's overall resource management.

Recovering the resources embedded in excreta and wastewater (like nutrients, water and energy) contributes to achieving Sustainable Development Goal 6 and other sustainable development goals.[3]

It can be efficient to combine wastewater and human excreta with other organic waste such as manure, and food and crop waste for the purposes of resource recovery.[4]

Treatment options

There is a large and growing number of treatment options to make excreta safe and manageable for the intended reuse option.[5] Various technologies and practices, ranging in scale from a single rural household to a city, can be used to capture potentially valuable resources and make them available for safe, productive uses that support human well-being and broader sustainability. Some treatment options are listed below but there are many more:[5]

A guide by the Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences provides a list of treatment technologies for sanitation resource recovery: Vermicomposting and vermifiltration, black soldier fly composting, algae cultivation, microbial fuel cell, nitrification and distillation of urine, struvite precipitation, incineration, carbonization, solar drying, membranes, filters, alkaline dehydration of urine,[6] ammonia sanitization/urea treatment, and lime sanitization.[7] Further research involves UV advanced oxidation processes in order to degrade organic pollutants present in the urine before reuse [8] or the dehydration of urine by using acids.[9]

Reuse options

The most common reuse of excreta is as fertilizer and soil conditioner in agriculture. This is also called a "closing the loop" approach for sanitation with agriculture. It is a central aspect of the ecological sanitation approach.

Reuse options depend on the form of the excreta that is being reused: it can be either excreta on its own or mixed with some water (fecal sludge)[10] or mixed with much water (domestic wastewater or sewage).

The most common types of excreta reuse include:[4]

Resource recovery from fecal sludge can take many forms, including as a fuel, soil amendment, building material, protein, animal fodder, and water for irrigation.[10]

Reuse products that can be recovered from sanitation systems include: Stored urine, concentrated urine, sanitized blackwater, digestate, nutrient solutions, dry urine, struvite, dried feces, pit humus, dewatered sludge, compost, ash from sludge, biochar, nutrient-enriched filter material, algae, macrophytes, black soldier fly larvae, worms, irrigation water, aquaculture, and biogas.[7]

As fertilizer

Comparison to other fertilizers

There is an untapped fertilizer resource in human excreta. In Africa, for example, the theoretical quantities of nutrients that can be recovered from human excreta are comparable with all current fertilizer use on the continent.[4] Therefore, reuse can support increased food production and also provide an alternative to chemical fertilizers, which is often unaffordable to small-holder farmers. However, nutritional value of human excreta largely depends on dietary input.[1]

Mineral fertilizers are made from mining activities and can contain heavy metals. Phosphate ores contain heavy metals such as cadmium and uranium, which can reach the food chain via mineral phosphate fertilizer.[11] This does not apply to excreta-based fertilizers (unless the human's food was contaminated beyond safe limits to start with), which is an advantage.

Fertilizing elements of organic fertilizers are mostly bound in carbonaceous reduced compounds. If these are already partially oxidized as in the compost, the fertilizing minerals are adsorbed on the degradation products (humic acids) etc. Thus, they exhibit a slow-release effect and are usually less rapidly leached compared to mineral fertilizers.[12] [13]

Urine

Urine contains large quantities of nitrogen (mostly as urea), as well as reasonable quantities of dissolved potassium.[14] The nutrient concentrations in urine vary with diet.[15] In particular, the nitrogen content in urine is related to quantity of protein in the diet: A high protein diet results in high urea levels in urine. The nitrogen content in urine is proportional to the total food protein in the person's diet, and the phosphorus content is proportional to the sum of total food protein and vegetal food protein. Urine's eight main ionic species (> 0.1 meq L−1) are cations Na, K, NH4, Ca, and the anions, Cl, SO4, PO4, and HCO3.[16] Urine typically contains 70% of the nitrogen and more than half the potassium found in sewage, while making up less than 1% of the overall volume.[14] The amount of urine produced by an adult is around 0.8 to 1.5 L per day.[2]

Applying urine as fertilizer has been called "closing the cycle of agricultural nutrient flows" or ecological sanitation or ecosan. Urine fertilizer is usually applied diluted with water because undiluted urine can chemically burn the leaves or roots of some plants, causing plant injury,[17] particularly if the soil moisture content is low. The dilution also helps to reduce odor development following application. When diluted with water (at a 1:5 ratio for container-grown annual crops with fresh growing medium each season or a 1:8 ratio for more general use), it can be applied directly to soil as a fertilizer.[18] [19] The fertilization effect of urine has been found to be comparable to that of commercial nitrogen fertilizers.[20] [21] Urine may contain pharmaceutical residues (environmental persistent pharmaceutical pollutants).[22] Concentrations of heavy metals such as lead, mercury, and cadmium, commonly found in sewage sludge, are much lower in urine.[23]

Typical design values for nutrients excreted with urine are: 4 kg nitrogen per person per year, 0.36 kg phosphorus per person per year and 1.0 kg potassium per person per year.[24] Based on the quantity of 1.5 L urine per day (or 550 L per year), the concentration values of macronutrients as follows: 7.3 g/L N; .67 g/L P; 1.8 g/L K.[24] These are design values but the actual values vary with diet.[14] Urine's nutrient content, when expressed with the international fertilizer convention of N:P2O5:K2O, is approximately 7:1.5:2.2. Since urine is rather diluted as a fertilizer compared to dry manufactured nitrogen fertilizers such as diammonium phosphate, the relative transport costs for urine are high as a lot of water needs to be transported.

The general limitations to using urine as fertilizer depend mainly on the potential for buildup of excess nitrogen (due to the high ratio of that macronutrient),[18] and inorganic salts such as sodium chloride, which are also part of the wastes excreted by the renal system. Over-fertilization with urine or other nitrogen fertilizers can result in too much ammonia for plants to absorb, acidic conditions, or other phytotoxicity.[22] Important parameters to consider while fertilizing with urine include salinity tolerance of the plant, soil composition, addition of other fertilizing compounds, and quantity of rainfall or other irrigation.[15] It was reported in 1995 that urine nitrogen gaseous losses were relatively high and plant uptake lower than with labelled ammonium nitrate. In contrast, phosphorus was utilized at a higher rate than soluble phosphate.[16] Urine can also be used safely as a source of nitrogen in carbon-rich compost.[19]

Human urine can be collected with sanitation systems that utilize urinals or urine diversion toilets. If urine is to be separated and collected for use as a fertilizer in agriculture, then this can be done with sanitation systems that utilize waterless urinals, urine-diverting dry toilets (UDDTs) or urine diversion flush toilets. During storage, the urea in urine is rapidly hydrolyzed by urease, creating ammonia.[25] Further treatment can be done with collected urine to stabilize the nitrogen and concentrate the fertilizer.[26] One low-tech solution to odor is to add citric acid or vinegar to the urine collection container, so that the urease is inactivated and any ammonia that do form are less volatile. Besides concentration, simple chemical processes can be used to extract pure substances: nitrogen as nitrates (similar to medieval nitre beds) and phosphorus as struvite.[26]

The health risks of using urine as a source of fertilizer are generally regarded as negligible, especially when dispersed in soil rather than on the part of a plant that is consumed. Urine can be distributed via perforated hoses buried ~10 cm under the surface of the soil among crop plants, thus minimizing risk of odors, loss of nutrients due to votalization, or transmission of pathogens.[27] There are potentially more environmental problems (such as eutrophication resulting from the influx of nutrient rich effluent into aquatic or marine ecosystems) and a higher energy consumption when urine is treated as part of sewage in sewage treatment plants compared with when it is used directly as a fertilizer resource.[28] [29]

In developing countries, the use of raw sewage or fecal sludge has been common throughout history, yet the application of pure urine to crops is still quite rare in 2021. This is despite many publications that advocate the use of urine as a fertilizer since at least 2001.[20] [30] Since about 2011, the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation is providing funding for research involving sanitation systems that recover the nutrients in urine.[31]

Feces

According to the 2004 "proposed Swedish default values", an average Swedish adult excretes 0.55 kg nitrogen, 0.18 kg phosphorus, and 0.36 kg potassium as feces per year. The yearly mass is 51 kg wet and 11 kg dried, so that wet feces would have a NPK% value of 1.1:0.8:0.9.[24]

Dried feces

Reuse of dried feces from urine-diverting dry toilets after post-treatment can result in increased crop production through fertilizing effects of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and improved soil fertility through organic carbon.[32]

Composted feces

Compost derived from composting toilets (where organic kitchen waste is in some cases also added to the composting toilet) has, in principle, the same uses as compost derived from other organic waste products, such as sewage sludge or municipal organic waste. One limiting factor may be legal restrictions due to the possibility that pathogens remain in the compost. In any case, the use of compost from composting toilets in one's own garden can be regarded as safe and is the main method of use for compost from composting toilets. Hygienic measures for handling of the compost must be applied by all those people who are exposed to it, e.g. wearing gloves and boots.

Some of the urine will be part of the compost although some urine will be lost via leachate and evaporation. Urine can contain up to 90 percent of the nitrogen, up to 50 percent of the phosphorus, and up to 70 percent of the potassium present in human excreta.[33]

The nutrients in compost from a composting toilet have a higher plant availability than dried feces from a typical urine-diverting dry toilet. The two processes are not mutually exclusive, however: some composting toilets do divert urine (to avoid over-saturation of water and nitrogen) and dried feces can still be composted.[34]

Fecal sludge

Fecal sludge is defined as "coming from onsite sanitation technologies, and has not been transported through a sewer." Examples of onsite technologies include pit latrines, unsewered public ablution blocks, septic tanks and dry toilets. Fecal sludge can be treated by a variety of methods to render it suitable for reuse in agriculture. These include (usually carried out in combination) dewatering, thickening, drying (in sludge drying beds), composting, pelletization, and anaerobic digestion.

Municipal wastewater

Reclaimed water can be reused for irrigation, industrial uses, replenishing natural water courses, water bodies, aquifers, and other potable and non-potable uses. These applications, however, focus usually on the water aspect, not on the nutrients and organic matter reuse aspect, which is the focus of "reuse of excreta".

When wastewater is reused in agriculture, its nutrient (nitrogen and phosphorus) content may be useful for additional fertilizer application.[35] Work by the International Water Management Institute and others has led to guidelines on how reuse of municipal wastewater in agriculture for irrigation and fertilizer application can be safely implemented in low income countries.[36] [2]

Sewage sludge

See main article: Sewage sludge and Biosolids. The use of treated sewage sludge (after treatment also called "biosolids") as a soil conditioner or fertilizer is possible but is a controversial topic in some countries (such as USA, some countries in Europe) due to the chemical pollutants it may contain, such as heavy metals and environmental persistent pharmaceutical pollutants.

Northumbrian Water in the United Kingdom uses two biogas plants to produce what the company calls "poo power"—using sewage sludge to produce energy to generate income. Biogas production has reduced its pre-1996 electricity expenditure of 20 million GBP by about 20%. Severn Trent and Wessex Water also have similar projects.[37]

Sludge treatment liquids

Sludge treatment liquids (after anaerobic digestion) can be used as an input source for a process to recover phosphorus in the form of struvite for use as fertilizer. For example, the Canadian company Ostara Nutrient Recovery Technologies is marketing a process based on controlled chemical precipitation of phosphorus in a fluidized bed reactor that recovers struvite in the form of crystalline pellets from sludge dewatering streams. The resulting crystalline product is sold to the agriculture, turf, and ornamental plants sectors as fertilizer under the registered trade name "Crystal Green".[38]

Peak phosphorus

In the case of phosphorus in particular, reuse of excreta is one known method to recover phosphorus to mitigate the looming shortage (also known as "peak phosphorus") of economical mined phosphorus. Mined phosphorus is a limited resource that is being used up for fertilizer production at an ever-increasing rate, which is threatening worldwide food security. Therefore, phosphorus from excreta-based fertilizers is an interesting alternative to fertilizers containing mined phosphate ore.[39]

Health and environmental aspects of agricultural use

Pathogens

Multiple barrier concept for safe use in agriculture

Research into how to make reuse of urine and feces safe in agriculture has been carried out in Sweden since the 1990s.[15] In 2006 the World Health Organization (WHO) provided guidelines on safe reuse of wastewater, excreta, and greywater.[2] The multiple barrier concept to reuse, which is the key cornerstone of this publication, has led to a clear understanding of how excreta reuse can be done safely. The concept is also used in water supply and food production, and is generally understood as a series of treatment steps and other safety precautions to prevent the spread of pathogens.

The degree of treatment required for excreta-based fertilizers before they can safely be used in agriculture depends on a number of factors. It mainly depends on which other barriers will be put in place according to the multiple barrier concept. Such barriers might be selecting a suitable crop, farming methods, methods of applying the fertilizer, education of the farmers, and so forth.[40]

For example, in the case of urine-diverting dry toilets secondary treatment of dried feces can be performed at community level rather than at household level and can include thermophilic composting where fecal material is composted at over 50 °C, prolonged storage with a duration of 1.5 to two years, chemical treatment with ammonia from urine to inactivate the pathogens, solar sanitation for further drying or heat treatment to eliminate pathogens.[41] [32]

Exposure of farm workers to untreated excreta constitutes a significant health risk due to its pathogen content. There can be a large amount of enteric bacteria, virus, protozoa, and helminth eggs in feces.[1] This risk also extends to consumers of crops fertilized with untreated excreta. Therefore, excreta needs to be appropriately treated before reuse, and health aspects need to be managed for all reuse applications as the excreta can contain pathogens even after treatment.

Treatment of excreta for pathogen removal

Temperature is a treatment parameter with an established relation to pathogen inactivation for all pathogen groups: Temperatures above have the potential to inactivate most pathogens.[7] Therefore, thermal sanitization is utilized in several technologies, such as thermophilic composting and thermophilic anaerobic digestion and potentially in sun drying. Alkaline conditions (pH value above 10) can also deactivate pathogens. This can be achieved with ammonia sanitization or lime treatment.[7]

The treatment of excreta and wastewater for pathogen removal can take place:

Indicator organisms

As an indicator organism in reuse schemes, helminth eggs are commonly used as these organisms are the most difficult to destroy in most treatment processes. The multiple barrier approach is recommended where e.g. lower levels of treatment may be acceptable when combined with other post-treatment barriers along the sanitation chain.[2]

Pharmaceutical residues

Excreta from humans contains hormones and pharmaceutical drug residues which could in theory enter the food chain via fertilized crops but are currently not fully removed by conventional wastewater treatment plants anyway and can enter drinking water sources via household wastewater (sewage).[42] In fact, the pharmaceutical residues in the excreta are degraded better in terrestrial systems (soil) than in aquatic systems.[42]

Nitrate pollution

Only a fraction of the nitrogen-based fertilizers is converted to produce plant matter. The remainder accumulates in the soil or is lost as run-off.[43] This also applies to excreta-based fertilizer since it also contains nitrogen. Excessive nitrogen which is not taken up by plants is transformed into nitrate which is easily leached.[44] High application rates combined with the high water-solubility of nitrate leads to increased runoff into surface water as well as leaching into groundwater.[45] [46] [47] Nitrate levels above 10 mg/L (10 ppm) in groundwater can cause 'blue baby syndrome' (acquired methemoglobinemia).[48] The nutrients, especially nitrates, in fertilizers can cause problems for ecosystems and for human health if they are washed off into surface water or leached through the soil into groundwater.

Other uses

Apart from use in agriculture, there are other possible uses of excreta. For example, in the case of fecal sludge, it can be treated and then serve as protein (black soldier fly process), fodder, fish food, building materials, and biofuels (biogas from anaerobic digestion, incineration or co-combustion of dried sludge, pyrolysis of fecal sludge, and biodiesel from fecal sludge).[49] [4]

Fuel

Solid fuel, heat, electricity

Pilot scale research in Uganda and Senegal has shown that it is viable to use dry feces as for combustion in industry, provided it has been dried to a minimum of 28% dry solids.[50]

Dried sewage sludge can be burned in sludge incineration plants and generate heat and electricity (the waste-to-energy process is one example).

Resource recovery of fecal sludge as a solid fuel has been found to have high market potential in Sub-Saharan Africa.[10]

Hydrogen fuel

Urine has also been investigated as a potential source of hydrogen fuel.[51] [52] Urine was found to be a suitable wastewater for high rate hydrogen production in a microbial electrolysis cell (MEC).[51]

Biogas

Small-scale biogas plants are being utilized in many countries, including Ghana,[53] Vietnam[54] and many others.[55] Larger centralized systems are being planned that mix animal and human feces to produce biogas.[50] Biogas is also produced during sewage sludge treatment processes with anaerobic digestion. Here, it can be used for heating the digesters and for generating electricity.[56]

Biogas is an important waste-to-energy resource which plays a huge role in reducing environmental pollution and most importantly in reducing greenhouse gases effect caused by the waste. Utilization of raw material such as human waste for biogas generation is considered beneficial because it does not require additional starters such as microorganism seeds for methane production, and a supply of microorganisms occurs continuously during the feeding of raw materials.[57]

Food source for livestock

See also: Pig latrine. Combination outhouses/feeding troughs were used in several countries since ancient times. They are generally being phased out.

Food source to produce protein for animal feed

Pilot facilities are being developed for feeding black soldier fly larvae with feces. The mature flies would then be a source of protein to be included in the production of feed for chickens in South Africa.[50]

Black soldier fly (BSF) bio-waste processing is a relatively new treatment technology that has received increasing attention over the last decades. Larvae grown on bio-waste can be a necessary raw material for animal feed production, and can therefore provide revenues for financially applicable waste management systems. In addition, when produced on bio-waste, insect-based feeds can be more sustainable than conventional feeds.[58]

Building materials

It is known that additions of fecal matter up to 20% by dried weight in clay bricks does not make a significant functional difference to bricks.[50]

Precious metals recovery

A Japanese sewage treatment facility extracts precious metals from sewage sludge, "high percentage of gold found at the Suwa facility was probably due to the large number of precision equipment manufacturers in the vicinity that use [gold]. The facility recently recorded finding 1,890 grammes of gold per tonne of ash from incinerated sludge. That is a far higher gold content than Japan’s Hishikari Mine, one of the world’s top gold mines, [...] which contains 20–40 grammes of the precious metal per tonne of ore." This idea was also tested by the US Geological Survey (USGS) which found that the yearly sewage sludge generated by 1 million people contained 13 million dollars worth of precious metals.[59]

Other materials

With pyrolysis, urine is turned into a pre-doped, highly porous, carbon material termed "urine carbon" (URC). URC is cheaper than current fuel cell catalysts while performing better.[60]

History

The reuse of excreta as a fertilizer for growing crops has been practiced in many countries for a long time.

Society and culture

Economics

Debate is ongoing about whether reuse of excreta is cost effective. The terms "sanitation economy" and "toilet resources" have been introduced to describe the potential for selling products made from human feces or urine.[61] [62]

Sale of compost

The NGO SOIL in Haiti began building urine-diverting dry toilets and composting the waste produced for agricultural use in 2006.[63] SOIL's two composting waste treatment facilities currently transform over 20,000 gallons (75,708 liters) of human excreta into organic, agricultural-grade compost every month.[64] The compost produced at these facilities is sold to farmers, organizations, businesses, and institutions around the country to help finance SOIL's waste treatment operations.[65] Crops grown with this soil amendment include spinach, peppers, sorghum, maize, and more. Each batch of compost produced is tested for the indicator organism E. coli to ensure that complete pathogen kill has taken place during the thermophilic composting process.[66]

Policies

There is still a lack of examples of implemented policy where the reuse aspect is fully integrated in policy and advocacy.[67] When considering drivers for policy change in this respect, the following lessons learned should be taken into consideration: Revising legislation does not necessarily lead to functioning reuse systems; it is important to describe the “institutional landscape” and involve all actors; parallel processes should be initiated at all levels of government (i.e. national, regional and local level); country specific strategies and approaches are needed; and strategies supporting newly developed policies need to be developed).[67]

Regulatory considerations

Regulations such as Global Good Agricultural Practices may hinder export and import of agricultural products that have been grown with the application of human excreta-derived fertilisers.[68] [69]

Urine use in organic farming in Europe

The European Union allows the use of source separated urine only in conventional farming within the EU, but not yet in organic farming. This is a situation that many agricultural experts, especially in Sweden, would like to see changed.[23] This ban may also reduce the options to use urine as a fertilizer in other countries if they wish to export their products to the EU.[68]

Dried feces from urine-diverting dry toilets in the U.S.

In the United States, the EPA regulation governs the management of sewage sludge but has no jurisdiction over the byproducts of a urine-diverting dry toilet. Oversight of these materials falls to the states.[70] [71]

Country examples

China

Treatment disposal of human excreta can be categorized into three types: fertilizer use, discharge and biogas use. Discharge is the disposal of human excreta to soil, septic tank or water body.[72] In China, with the impact of the long tradition, human excreta is often used as fertilizer for crops.[73] The main application methods are direct usage for crops and fruits as basal or top application after fermentation in a ditch for a certain period, compost with crop stalk for basal application and direct usage as feed for fish in ponds.[74] On the other hand, as much as many people rely on human waste as an agricultural fertilizer, if the waste is not properly treated, the use of night soil may promote the spread of infectious diseases.[75]

India

See main article: Jeevamrutha. Urine is used as organic manure in India. It is also used for making an alcohol-based bio-pesticide: the ammonia within breaks down lignin, allowing plant materials like straw to be more easily fermented into alcohol.

Kenya

In Mukuru, Kenya, the slum dwellers are worst hit by the sanitation challenge due to a high population density and a lack of supporting infrastructure. Makeshift pit latrines, illegal toilet connections to the main sewer systems and lack of running water to support the flushable toilets present a sanitation nightmare in all Kenyan slums. The NGO Sanergy seeks to provide decent toilet facilities to Mukuru residents and uses the feces and urine from the toilets to provide fertilizer and energy for the market.[76]

Uganda

Reuse of wastewater in agriculture is a common practice in the developing world. In a study in Kampala, although famers were not using fecal sludge, 8% of farmers were using wastewater sludge as a soil amendment. Compost from animal manure and composted household waste are applied by many farmers as soil conditioners. On the other hand, farmers are already mixing their own feed because of limited trust in the feed industry and the quality of products.[77]

Electricity demand is significantly more than the electricity generation and only a small margin of the population nationally has access to electricity. The pellets produced from fecal sludge are being used in gasification for electricity production. Converting fecal sludge for energy could contribute toward meeting present and future energy needs.[78]

In Tororo District in eastern Uganda—a region with severe land degradation problems—smallholder farmers appreciated urine fertilization as a low-cost, low-risk practice. They found that it could contribute to significant yield increases. The importance of social norms and cultural perceptions needs to be recognized but these are not absolute barriers to adoption of the practice.[79]

Ghana

In Ghana, the only wide scale implementation is small scale rural digesters, with about 200 biogas plants using human excreta and animal dung as feedstock. Linking up of public toilets with biogas digesters as a way of improving communal hygiene and combating hygiene-related communicable diseases including cholera and dysentery is also a notable solution within Ghana.[77]

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. Harder . Robin . Wielemaker . Rosanne . Larsen . Tove A. . Zeeman . Grietje . Öberg . Gunilla . 2019-04-18 . Recycling nutrients contained in human excreta to agriculture: Pathways, processes, and products . Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology . 49 . 8 . 695–743 . 10.1080/10643389.2018.1558889 . 2019CREST..49..695H . 1064-3389 . free.
  2. WHO (2006). WHO Guidelines for the Safe Use of Wastewater, Excreta and Greywater - Volume IV: Excreta and greywater use in agriculture. World Health Organization (WHO), Geneva, Switzerland
  3. Andersson . Kim . Dickin . Sarah . Rosemarin . Arno . 2016-12-08 . Towards "Sustainable" Sanitation: Challenges and Opportunities in Urban Areas . Sustainability . en . 8 . 12 . 1289 . 10.3390/su8121289 . free.
  4. Andersson, K., Rosemarin, A., Lamizana, B., Kvarnström, E., McConville, J., Seidu, R., Dickin, S. and Trimmer, C. (2016). Sanitation, Wastewater Management and Sustainability: from Waste Disposal to Resource Recovery. Nairobi and Stockholm: United Nations Environment Programme and Stockholm Environment Institute.
  5. Book: Tilley . Elizabeth . Compendium of Sanitation Systems and Technologies . Ulrich . Lukas . Lüthi . Christoph . Reymond . Philippe . Zurbrügg . Chris . Swiss Federal Institute of Aquatic Science and Technology (Eawag) . 2014 . 978-3-906484-57-0 . 2nd . Duebendorf, Switzerland . Septic tanks . http://ecompendium.sswm.info/sanitation-technologies/septic-tank?group_code=s.
  6. Simha . Prithvi . Senecal . Jenna . Nordin . Annika . Lalander . Cecilia . Vinnerås . Björn . 2018-10-01 . Alkaline dehydration of anion–exchanged human urine: Volume reduction, nutrient recovery and process optimisation . Water Research . 142 . 325–336 . 10.1016/j.watres.2018.06.001 . 29890480 . 2018WatRe.142..325S . 48364901 . 0043-1354. free .
  7. McConville, J., Niwagaba, C., Nordin, A., Ahlström, M., Namboozo, V. and Kiffe, M. (2020). Guide to Sanitation Resource-Recovery Products & Technologies: A supplement to the Compendium of Sanitation Systems and Technologies. 1st Edition. Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SLU), Department of Energy and Technology, Uppsala, Sweden.
  8. Demissie . Natnael . Simha . Prithvi . Lai . Foon Yin . Ahrens . Lutz . Mussabek . Dauren . Desta . Adey . Vinnerås . Björn . 2023-08-15 . Degradation of 75 organic micropollutants in fresh human urine and water by UV advanced oxidation process . Water Research . 242 . 120221 . 10.1016/j.watres.2023.120221 . 37390654 . 2023WatRe.24220221D . 259304374 . 0043-1354. free .
  9. Simha . Prithvi . Vasiljev . Anastasija . Randall . Dyllon G. . Vinnerås . Björn . 2023-06-25 . Factors influencing the recovery of organic nitrogen from fresh human urine dosed with organic/inorganic acids and concentrated by evaporation in ambient conditions . Science of the Total Environment . 879 . 163053 . 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.163053 . 36966823 . 2023ScTEn.879p3053S . 257752415 . 0048-9697. free .
  10. Andriessen . Nienke . Ward . Barbara J. . Strande . Linda . 2019 . To char or not to char? Review of technologies to produce solid fuels for resource recovery from faecal sludge . Journal of Water, Sanitation and Hygiene for Development . en . 9 . 2 . 210–224 . 10.2166/washdev.2019.184 . 2043-9083 . free.
  11. Kratz, S. (2004) Uran in Düngemitteln (in German). Uran-Umwelt-Unbehagen: Statusseminar am 14. Oktober 2004, Bundesforschungsinstitut für Landwirtschaft (FAL), Institut für Pflanzenernährung und Bodenkunde, Germany.
  12. J. B. Sartain . 2011 . Food for turf: Slow-release nitrogen . Grounds Maintenance for Golf and Green Industries Professionals (Blog Post) . 2018-08-27 . 2019-10-29 . https://web.archive.org/web/20191029053115/http://www.grounds-mag.com/mag/grounds_maintenance_food_turf_slowrelease/ . dead .
  13. Diacono . Mariangela . Montemurro . Francesco . 2010 . Long-term effects of organic amendments on soil fertility. A review . Agronomy for Sustainable Development . 30 . 2 . 401–422 . 10.1051/agro/2009040 . 1774-0746 . 7493884.
  14. Rose . C . Parker . A . Jefferson . B . Cartmell . E . 2015 . The Characterization of Feces and Urine: A Review of the Literature to Inform Advanced Treatment Technology . Critical Reviews in Environmental Science and Technology . 45 . 17 . 1827–1879 . 10.1080/10643389.2014.1000761 . 4500995 . 26246784. 2015CREST..45.1827R .
  15. Joensson, H., Richert Stintzing, A., Vinneras, B., Salomon, E. (2004). Guidelines on the Use of Urine and Faeces in Crop Production. Stockholm Environment Institute, Sweden
  16. Kirchmann . H. . Pettersson . S. . 1995 . Human urine - Chemical composition and fertilizer use efficiency . Fertilizer Research . 40 . 2 . 149–154 . 10.1007/bf00750100 . 24528286 . 0167-1731.
  17. H. M. Vines, & Wedding, R. T. (1960). Some Effects of Ammonia on Plant Metabolism and a Possible Mechanism for Ammonia Toxicity. Plant Physiology, 35(6), 820–825.
  18. Book: Morgan, Peter . An Ecological Approach to Sanitation in Africa: A Compilation of Experiences . 2004 . CD release . Aquamor, Harare, Zimbabwe . 10. The Usefulness of urine . 6 December 2011 . http://www.ecosanres.org/PM_Report.htm.
  19. Book: Steinfeld, Carol . Liquid Gold: The Lore and Logic of Using Urine to Grow Plants . Ecowaters Books . 2004 . 978-0-9666783-1-4.
  20. Web site: 2001 . Urine Separation – Closing the Nitrogen Cycle . Stockholm Water Company . Johansson M, Jönsson H, Höglund C, Richert Stintzing A, Rodhe L.
  21. Pradhan . Surendra K. . Nerg . Anne-Marja . Sjöblom . Annalena . Holopainen . Jarmo K. . Heinonen-Tanski . Helvi . 2007 . Use of Human Urine Fertilizer in Cultivation of Cabbage (Brassica oleracea) – Impacts on Chemical, Microbial, and Flavor Quality . Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry . en . 55 . 21 . 8657–8663 . 10.1021/jf0717891 . 0021-8561 . 17894454 . 11255276. free .
  22. Winker, M. (2009). Pharmaceutical Residues in Urine and Potential Risks related to Usage as Fertiliser in Agriculture [TUHH University Library]. https://doi.org/10.15480/882.481
  23. Web site: Håkan Jönsson . 2001-10-01 . Urine Separation — Swedish Experiences . EcoEng Newsletter 1 . 2009-04-19 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20090427000144/http://www.iees.ch/EcoEng011/EcoEng011_F1.html . 2009-04-27.
  24. Jönsson, H., Richert Stintzing, A., Vinnerås, B. and Salomon, E. (2004) Guidelines on the use of urine and faeces in crop production, EcoSanRes Publications Series, Report 2004-2, Sweden [This source seems to truncate the Jönsson & Vinnerås (2004) table by omitting the potassium row. The full version may be found at the original source at [https://www.researchgate.net/publication/285858813 RG#285858813]]
  25. Freney, J. R., Simpson, J. R., & Denmead, O. T. (1981). AMMONIA VOLATILIZATION. Ecological Bulletins, 33, 291–302. https://www.jstor.org/stable/45128671
  26. Wald . Chelsea . The urine revolution: how recycling pee could help to save the world . Nature . 10 February 2022 . 602 . 7896 . 202–206 . 10.1038/d41586-022-00338-6 . 35140393 . 2022Natur.602..202W . 246700356.
  27. Web site: Canaday . Chris . Suggestions for sustainable sanitation . December 21, 2016 . Issuu . en . 2022-02-17 . live . https://web.archive.org/web/20210728153705/https://issuu.com/chriscana/docs/suggestions_for_sustainable_sanitat . 2021-07-28.
  28. 12926619 . 2003 . Maurer . M . Nutrients in urine: Energetic aspects of removal and recovery . Water Science and Technology . 48 . 1 . 37–46 . Schwegler . P . Larsen . T. A . 10.2166/wst.2003.0011 . 24913408 .
  29. Book: Ganrot, Zsofia . Ph.D. Thesis: Urine processing for efficient nutrient recovery and reuse in agriculture . Goteborg University . 2005 . Goteborg, Sweden . 170.
  30. Mara Grunbaum (2010) Human urine is shown to be an effective agricultural fertilizer, Scientific American, Retrieved on 2011-12-07.
  31. von Muench, E., Spuhler, D., Surridge, T., Ekane, N., Andersson, K., Fidan, E. G., Rosemarin, A. (2013). Sustainable Sanitation Alliance members take a closer look at the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation's sanitation grants. Sustainable Sanitation Practice (SSP) Journal, Issue 17, EcoSan Club, Austria
  32. Rieck, C., von Münch, E., Hoffmann, H. (2012). Technology review of urine-diverting dry toilets (UDDTs) - Overview on design, management, maintenance and costs. Deutsche Gesellschaft fuer Internationale Zusammenarbeit GmbH, Eschborn, Germany
  33. http://www2.gtz.de/Dokumente/oe44/ecosan/en-fighting-urine-blindness-1998.pdf J.O. Drangert, Urine separation systems
  34. Berger, W. (2011). Technology review of composting toilets - Basic overview of composting toilets (with or without urine diversion). Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit GmbH, Eschborn, Germany
  35. Book: Resource recovery from waste: business models for energy, nutrient and water reuse in low- and middle-income countries . Otoo . Miriam . Drechsel . Pay . Routledge - Earthscan . 2018 . Oxon, UK.
  36. Book: Wastewater irrigation and health: assessing and mitigating risk in low-income countries . 2010 . Earthscan . London . 978-1-84407-795-3 . London: Earthscan. . Drechsel P, Scott CA, Raschid-Sally L, Redwood M, Bahri A.
  37. Web site: The firms turning poo into profit . 16 November 2016 . BBC News Business Section . 17 November 2016.
  38. Web site: Ostara Nutrient Management Solutions . Ostara, Vancouver, Canada . 19 February 2015 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20150219161148/http://www.ostara.com/nutrient-management-solutions/pearl-process . 19 February 2015.
  39. Soil Association (2010). A rock and a hard place - Peak phosphorus and the threat to our food security. Soil Association, Bristol, UK
  40. Richert, A., Gensch, R., Jönsson, H., Stenström, T., Dagerskog, L. (2010). Practical guidance on the use of urine in crop production. Stockholm Environment Institute (SEI), Sweden
  41. Niwagaba, C. B. (2009). Treatment technologies for human faeces and urine – PhD thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden
  42. von Münch, E., Winker, M. (2011). Technology review of urine diversion components - Overview on urine diversion components such as waterless urinals, urine diversion toilets, and urine storage and reuse systems. Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit GmbH
  43. Book: 10.1007/978-94-007-7814-6_5 . Eutrophication of Lakes . Eutrophication: Causes, Consequences and Control . 55–71 . 2014 . Callisto . Marcos . Molozzi . Joseline . Barbosa . José Lucena Etham . 978-94-007-7813-9.
  44. 10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092932 . 18444903 . Roots, Nitrogen Transformations, and Ecosystem Services . Annual Review of Plant Biology . 59 . 341–63 . 2008 . Jackson . Louise E . Burger . Martin . Cavagnaro . Timothy R . 6817866 .
  45. Web site: C. J. Rosen . B. P. Horgan . amp . Preventing Pollution Problems from Lawn and Garden Fertilizers . Extension.umn.edu . 9 January 2009 . 25 August 2010 . 7 October 2010 . https://web.archive.org/web/20101007123519/http://www.extension.umn.edu/distribution/horticulture/dg2923.html . dead .
  46. 10.1016/0169-7722(95)00067-4 . Fertilizer-N use efficiency and nitrate pollution of groundwater in developing countries . Journal of Contaminant Hydrology . 20 . 3–4 . 167–84 . 1995 . Bijay-Singh . Yadvinder-Singh . Sekhon . G.S . 1995JCHyd..20..167S.
  47. Web site: NOFA Interstate Council: The Natural Farmer. Ecologically Sound Nitrogen Management. Mark Schonbeck . Nofa.org . 25 February 2004 . 25 August 2010 . dead . https://web.archive.org/web/20040324090920/http://www.nofa.org/tnf/nitrogen.php . 24 March 2004.
  48. 10.1289/ehp.00108675 . 10903623 . 1638204 . Blue Babies and Nitrate-Contaminated Well Water . Environmental Health Perspectives . 108 . 7 . 675–8 . 2000 . Knobeloch . Lynda . Salna . Barbara . Hogan . Adam . Postle . Jeffrey . Anderson . Henry.
  49. Book: Linda . Strande . Mariska . Ronteltap . Damir . Brdjanovic . Faecal sludge management: systems approach for implementation and operation . 2013 . IWA Publishing . 978-1-78040-472-1 .
  50. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.04.005 . A value proposition: Resource recovery from faecal sludge—Can it be the driver for improved sanitation? . Resources, Conservation and Recycling . 88 . 32–8 . 2014 . Diener . Stefan . Semiyaga . Swaib . Niwagaba . Charles B . Muspratt . Ashley Murray . Gning . Jean Birane . Mbéguéré . Mbaye . Ennin . Joseph Effah . Zurbrugg . Christian . Strande . Linda . free.
  51. 10.1016/j.ijhydene.2013.10.089 . Hydrogen production and ammonium recovery from urine by a Microbial Electrolysis Cell . International Journal of Hydrogen Energy . 39 . 10 . 4771–8 . 2014 . Kuntke . P . Sleutels . T.H.J.A . Saakes . M . Buisman . C.J.N.
  52. 10.1016/j.cattod.2012.02.009 . Electrolysis of Urea and Urine for Solar Hydrogen (supplementary material) . Catalysis Today . 199 . 2–7 . 2013 . Kim . Jungwon . Choi . Won Joon K . Choi . Jina . Hoffmann . Michael R . Park . Hyunwoong .
  53. 10.1016/j.ejpe.2016.10.004 . Feasibility study for biogas integration into waste treatment plants in Ghana . Egyptian Journal of Petroleum . 26 . 3 . 695–703 . 2017 . Mohammed . M . Egyir . I.S . Donkor . A.K . Amoah . P . Nyarko . S . Boateng . K.K . Ziwu . C . free.
  54. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.09.114 . Addressing problems at small-scale biogas plants: A case study from central Vietnam . Journal of Cleaner Production . 112 . 2784–92 . 2016 . Roubík . Hynek . Mazancová . Jana . Banout . Jan . Verner . Vladimír.
  55. 10.1016/j.renene.2017.08.068 . Current approach to manure management for small-scale Southeast Asian farmers - Using Vietnamese biogas and non-biogas farms as an example . Renewable Energy . 115 . 362–70 . 2018 . Roubík . Hynek . Mazancová . Jana . Phung . Le Dinh . Banout . Jan. 1
  56. Web site: Sludge treatment and disposal - efficient & safe Endress+Hauser. endress.com. en. 2018-03-14.
  57. Andriani . Dian . Wresta . Arini . Saepudin . Aep . Prawara . Budi . 2015-04-01 . A Review of Recycling of Human Excreta to Energy through Biogas Generation: Indonesia Case . Energy Procedia . 2nd International Conference on Sustainable Energy Engineering and Application (ICSEEA) 2014 Sustainable Energy for Green Mobility . en . 68 . 219–225 . 10.1016/j.egypro.2015.03.250 . 1876-6102 . free.
  58. 2018-12-01 . Decomposition of biowaste macronutrients, microbes, and chemicals in black soldier fly larval treatment: A review . Waste Management . en . 82 . 302–318 . 10.1016/j.wasman.2018.10.022 . 0956-053X . Gold . Moritz . Tomberlin . Jeffery K. . Diener . Stefan . Zurbrügg . Christian . Mathys . Alexander . 30509593 . 2018WaMan..82..302G . free. 20.500.11850/302327 . free .
  59. News: Sewage yields more gold than top mines. 2009-01-30. Reuters. 2016-02-27.
  60. Chaudhari . Nitin Kaduba . Song . Min Young . Yu . Jong-Sung . Heteroatom-doped highly porous carbon from human urine . Scientific Reports . May 2015 . 4 . 1 . 5221 . 10.1038/srep05221 . 24909133 . 4049026 . free.
  61. Web site: The rise of the sanitation economy: how business can help solve a global crisis . Paranipe . Nitin . 19 September 2017 . Thomson Reuters Foundation News . November 13, 2017.
  62. Book: Introducing the Sanitation Economy . Toilet Board Coalition . 2017.
  63. Christine Dell'Amore, "Human Waste to Revive Haitian Farmland?", The National Geographic, October 26, 2011
  64. Jonathan Hera, "Haiti Non-Profit Plumbs Solutions to World's Unmet Sanitation Needs", "The Globe and the Mail", November 14, 2014
  65. Kramer, S., Preneta, N., Kilbride, A. (2013). Two papers from SOIL presented at the 36th WEDC International Conference, Nakuru, Kenya, 2013. SOIL, Haiti
  66. Erica Lloyd, "Safety First: The New and Improved SOIL Lab", "SOIL blog", February 2, 2014
  67. SEI (2009). Sanitation policies and regulatory frameworks for reuse of nutrients in wastewater, human excreta and greywater - Proceedings from SEI/EcoSanRes2 Workshop in Sweden. Stockholm Environment Institute, Sweden
  68. Elisabeth Kvarnström, Linus Dagerskog, Anna Norström and Mats Johansson (2012) Nutrient reuse as a solution multiplier (SIANI policy brief 1.1), A policy brief by the SIANI Agriculture-Sanitation Expert Group, Sweden
  69. Moya . Berta . Parker . Alison . Sakrabani . Ruben . 2019 . Challenges to the use of fertilisers derived from human excreta: The case of vegetable exports from Kenya to Europe and influence of certification systems . Food Policy . en . 85 . 72–78 . 10.1016/j.foodpol.2019.05.001 . free.
  70. Web site: EPA 832-F-99-066 . September 1999 . Water Efficiency Technology Fact Sheet Composting Toilets . United States Environmental Protection Agency . 29 January 2013 . Office of Water . 3 January 2015.
  71. Web site: Title 40 - Protection of Environment Chapter I - Environmental Protection Agency, Subchapter 0 - Sewage sludge Part 503 - Standards for the use or disposal of sewage sludge . U.S. Government Publishing Office . 3 January 2015.
  72. Liu . Ying . Huang . Ji-kun . Zikhali . Precious . 2014-02-01 . Use of Human Excreta as Manure in Rural China . Journal of Integrative Agriculture . en . 13 . 2 . 434–442 . 10.1016/S2095-3119(13)60407-4 . 2095-3119 . free.
  73. Worster . Donald . 2017 . The Good Muck: Toward an Excremental History of China . RCC Perspectives: Transformations in Environment and Society . 2 . 10.5282/rcc/8135 . free.
  74. Shiming . Luo . 2002 . The Utilization of Human Excreta in Chinese Agriculture and the Challenge Faced . South China Agricultural University, EcoSanRes.
  75. Carlton . Elizabeth J. . Liu . Yang . Zhong . Bo . Hubbard . Alan . Spear . Robert C. . 2015-01-15 . Associations between Schistosomiasis and the Use of Human Waste as an Agricultural Fertilizer in China . PLOS Neglected Tropical Diseases . 9 . 1 . e0003444 . 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003444 . 1935-2727 . 4295866 . 25590142 . free .
  76. Likoko, E. (2013) Ecological Management of Human Excreta in an Urban Slum: A case study of Mukuru in Kenya. Master's thesis in Sustainable Development at Uppsala University, Department of Earth Sciences, Uppsala University, Sweden, No. 148, 41 pp.
  77. 2014-07-01 . A value proposition: Resource recovery from faecal sludge—Can it be the driver for improved sanitation? . Resources, Conservation and Recycling . en . 88 . 32–38 . 10.1016/j.resconrec.2014.04.005 . 0921-3449 . Diener . Stefan . Semiyaga . Swaib . Niwagaba . Charles B. . Muspratt . Ashley Murray . Gning . Jean Birane . Mbéguéré . Mbaye . Ennin . Joseph Effah . Zurbrugg . Christian . Strande . Linda . free.
  78. 2015 . Production of Pellets and Electricity from Faecal Sludge . Excreta and Wastewater Management . 16 / 2015 . Sandec News.
  79. Andersson . Elina . 2015 . Turning waste into value: Using human urine to enrich soils for sustainable food production in Uganda . Journal of Cleaner Production . 96 . 290–8 . 10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.01.070 . free.