Return migration explained

Return migration refers to the individual or family decision of a migrant to leave a host country and to return permanently to the country of origin. Research topics include the return migration process, motivations for returning, the experiences returnees encounter, and the impacts of return migration on both the host and the home countries.[1]

The exact numbers are debated, but Mark Wyman concludes: "The totals are so enormous: at least one-third of the 52 million Europeans who left Europe between 1824 and 1924 returned permanently to their homelands."[2]

"Return migration" can be contrasted with repatriation, which is imposed by the host government on a specified group of immigrants.[3] It should also be distinguished from circular migration, in which migrants repeatedly travel between origin and destination countries, for example to plant and harvest crops each season.

Motivations

See main article: Push and pull factors in migration. Return migration to the original home by migrants living in their new home can be motivated by numerous factors, singly or in combination.[4] Some common motivations for return migration are:[5] [6] [7]

Impact on Host and home countries

Return migration can have major impacts on both the migrants themselves and the countries involved. For the migrants, it can lead to cultural readjustment, the reestablishment of social networks, and potential economic opportunities. For the countries of origin, return migration can bring back human capital, skills, and resources that contribute to development and economic growth.However, return migration is not always a smooth process. Migrants may face challenges in reintegrating into their home societies, including finding suitable employment, adapting to changes in the local environment, or dealing with the stigma associated with migration. The decision to return is often influenced by a complex interplay of individual circumstances and broader economic, social, and political factors.[13]

Government roles

See main article: Voluntary return. Voluntary return is the return of eligible persons, such as refugees, to their country of origin or citizenship on the basis of freely expressed willingness to such return. Voluntary return, unlike expulsion and deportation, which are actions of sovereign states, is defined as a personal right under specific conditions described in various international instruments, such as the OAU Convention, along with customary international law.

Certain countries offer financial support to refugees and immigrants to help them start a new life in their country of origin. Examples in the 21st century are:

544 Nigerians returned home from Switzerland in 2013.[19]

Two countries may have a re-admission agreement, which establishes procedures, on a reciprocal basis, for one state to return "irregular" non-nationals to their country of origin or to a country through which they have transited. Illegal immigrants are frequently repatriated as a matter of government policy. Repatriation measures of voluntary return, with financial assistance, as well as measures of deportation are used in many countries.

Deportation

Involuntary or forced repatriation is the return of refugees, prisoners of war, or civil detainees to their country of origin under circumstances that leave no other viable alternatives.[20] According to modern international law, prisoners of war, civil detainees, or refugees refusing repatriation, particularly if motivated by fears of political persecution in their own country, should be protected from refoulement and given, if possible, temporary or permanent asylum.[21] The forced return of people to countries where they would face persecution is more specifically known as refoulement, which is against international law.

Repatriation vs. return

While repatriation necessarily brings an individual to his or her territory of origin or citizenship, a return potentially includes bringing the person back to the point of departure. This could be to a third country, including a country of transit, which is a country the person has traveled through to get to the country of destination. A return could also be within the territorial boundaries of a country, as in the case of returning internally displaced persons and demobilized combatants. The distinction between repatriation and return, voluntary or involuntary, is not always clear.[22]

Rates of return from United States by ethnicity 1899–1924

EthnicityRate
Jewish4%
Irish9%
German14%
Scandinavian15%
Armenian18%
Dutch19%
British/British Canadian19%
French Canadian24%
Polish33%
Italian46%
Hungarian47%
Greek54%
Romanian66%

Source: Archdeacon. p 139.[23]

See also

Notes

  1. For the recent historiography see Tuncay Bilecen, "To Stay or to Return? A Review on Return Migration Literature" Migration Letters (2022) 19#4 pp. 367–385. https://doi.org/10.33182/ml.v19i4.2092; and Mohamed-Abdullahi Mohamed, and Asmat-Nizam Abdul-Talib "Push–pull factors influencing international return migration intentions: a systematic literature review" Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy (2020) 14#2 pp. 231-246 online
  2. Mark Wyman, 2005, p. 16.
  3. Marta Bivand Erdal, "Migration, Forced" in International Encyclopedia of Human Geography (2nd ed. 2020) pp 105-110.
  4. Thomas Niedomysl, and Jan Amcoff, "Why return migrants return: Survey evidence on motives for internal return migration in Sweden." Population, Space and Place 17.5 (2011): 656-673.
  5. Mark Wyman, Round-Trip to America (1993) pp 204-209.
  6. Mohamed-Abdullahi Mohamed, and Asmat-Nizam Abdul-Talib, "Push–pull factors influencing international return migration intentions: a systematic literature review." Journal of Enterprising Communities: People and Places in the Global Economy 14.2 (2020): 231-246.
  7. Thomas J. Archdeacon, Becoming American (1984) p. 137.
  8. Archdeacon, p. 104.
  9. Archdeacon, p. 151.
  10. Archdeacon, pp. 16, 38, 123.
  11. Marco Soresina, "Italian emigration policy during the Great Migration Age, 1888–1919: the interaction of emigration and foreign policy" Journal of Modern Italian Studies (2016) 21:5 pp.723-746, DOI: 10.1080/1354571X.2016.1242260
  12. Sarah Jenkins, "Ethnicity, violence, and the immigrant-guest metaphor in Kenya." African affairs 111.445 (2012): 576-596.
  13. Mark Wyman, Round-Trip to America (1993) pp 204-209.
  14. https://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/worldnews/europe/denmark/6533845/Denmark-offers-immigrants-12000-to-return-home.html "Denmark offers immigrants £12,000 to return home"
  15. http://nigeriaworld.com/feature/publication/ubochi/112809.html "Switzerland and Nigerians Abroad"
  16. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/nov/15/ireland-pay-immigrants-go-home "Irish government to pay immigrants to go home"
  17. http://www.politico.eu/article/germany-to-pay-for-migrants-to-go-home-gerd-muller/ "Germany to pay for migrants to go home"
  18. https://www.onenewsnow.com/culture/2016/08/29/thousands-of-migrants-paid-by-swedish-govt-to-leave "Thousands of migrants paid by Swedish gov't to leave"
  19. http://www.swissinfo.ch/directdemocracy/returning-asylum-seekers_a-fresh-start-in-nigeria--brought-to-you-by-switzerland/38687662 "A fresh start in Nigeria, brought to you by Switzerland"
  20. Elena Fiddian-Qasmiyeh, et al., eds. The Oxford handbook of refugee and forced migration studies (Oxford UP, 2014).
  21. Perruchoud, Richard and Jillyanne Redpath-Cross (eds.), Glossary on Migration, Second Edition, International Organisation for Migration, International Migration Law, No. 25, Geneva, 2011.
  22. Julien. Brachet. Policing the Desert: The IOM in Libya Beyond War and Peace. Antipode. 48. 2. 2016. 272–292. 10.1111/anti.12176.
  23. Thomas J. Archdeacon, Becoming American (Simon and Schuster, 1984). p 139. online

Further reading

Return to Asia-Pacific

Return to Europe

From United States

From Canada

Other countries

Scholarly Journals

External links