1914 Australian Senate election explained

Country:Australia
Type:parliamentary
Ongoing:no
Election Date:5 September 1914
Previous Election:1913 Australian Senate election
Previous Year:1913
Next Election:1917 Australian Senate election
Next Year:1917
Seats For Election:All 36 seats in the Senate
Majority Seats:18
Image1:Sir George Pearce.jpg
Leader1:George Pearce
Party1:Australian Labor Party
Leaders Seat1:Western Australia
Seats Before1:29
Seats1:30
Seat Change1:1
Popular Vote1:6,119,018
Percentage1:52.16%
Swing1:3.43pp
Leader2:Joseph Cook
Party2:Liberal
Leaders Seat2:Not a Senator
Seats Before2:6
Seats2:5
Seat Change2:1
Popular Vote2:5,605,305
Percentage2:47.77%
Swing2:1.61pp

The 5 September 1914 election was a double dissolution election which meant all 36 seats in the Senate were up for election, with each Australian states electing six members, with half to serve a six-year term and the rest to serve a three year term. Terms were taken to have commenced on 1 July 1914. The Senate resolved that in each State the three senators who received the most votes would sit for a six-year term, finishing on 30 June 1920 while the other half would sit for a three-year term, finishing on 30 June 1917.[1]

It was a landslide victory for the Labor Party, which won 31 seats and was the largest party by first preference votes in every state except South Australia. The opposition party, the Commonwealth Liberal Party, won just one seat, which was in South Australia, despite retaining four seats (two each in New South Wales and Tasmania). The Liberal Party lost three seats, one each in New South Wales, Victoria and Tasmania, while Labor lost one seat in New South Wales. Every state except Western Australia and South Australia swung to Labor.

Australia

Party! rowspan=2
Votes%SwingSeatsChange
6 year term3 year termTotal
 align=right 6,119,018align=right 52.15align=right +3.43align=right 17align=right 14align=right 31align=right 2
 align=right 5,605,305align=right 47.77align=right −1.61align=right 1align=right 4align=right 4align=right 2
 salign=right 9,799align=right 0.08align=right −0.78align=right align=right align=right align=right
Totalalign=right 11,734,122align=right align=right align=right 18align=right 18align=right 36align=right
Invalid/blank votesalign=right 86,649align=right 4.24align=right −1.42align=right align=right align=right align=right
Turnoutalign=right 2,042,336align=right 73.63align=right −0.99align=right align=right align=right
Registered votersalign=right 2,811,515align=right align=right align=right align=right align=right align=right
Source: Psephos: 1914 Senate

New South Wales

Each elector voted for up to six candidates. Percentages refer to the number of voters rather than the number of votes.

Queensland

Each elector voted for up to six candidates. Percentages refer to the number of voters rather than the number of votes.

South Australia

Each elector voted for up to six candidates. Percentages refer to the number of voters rather than the number of votes.

Sitting senator Gregor McGregor had re-nominated but died after the close of nominations, leaving Labor with only 5 candidates. Electors were required to vote for 6 candidates or their vote would be invalid. If there was a large informal vote or if the surplus votes were equally distributed there was a risk of Labor losing more than one seat. Labor therefore asked its supporters to vote for John Shannon .[2]

Tasmania

Each elector voted for up to six candidates. Percentages refer to the number of voters rather than the number of votes.

Victoria

Each elector voted for up to six candidates. Percentages refer to the number of voters rather than the number of votes.

Western Australia

Each elector voted for up to six candidates. Percentages refer to the number of voters rather than the number of votes.

See also

Notes and References

  1. Rotation of Senators. Commonwealth of Australia. Senate. 9 October 1914. 41.
  2. News: Warning to Labor electors . . 29 August 1914 . 22 July 2022 . 4 . Trove.