Registry of Open Access Repositories explained

Full Name:Registry of Open Access Repositories
Formation:2003
Website:http://roar.eprints.org

The Registry of Open Access Repositories (ROAR) is a searchable international database indexing the creation, location and growth of open access institutional repositories and their contents. ROAR was created by EPrints at University of Southampton, UK, in 2003.[1] [2] [3] [4] It began as the Institutional Archives Registry and was renamed Registry of Open Access Repositories in 2006.[5] [6] To date, over 3,000 institutional and cross-institutional repositories have been registered.[7]

As of 2015, ROAR and the UK-based Directory of Open Access Repositories (OpenDOAR) "are considered the two leading open access directories worldwide. ROAR is the larger directory and allows direct submissions to the directory. OpenDOAR controls submission of materials and is dependent on the discretion of its staff. OpenDOAR requires open access of scholarly publications; whereas ROAR allows other types of materials to be included. ROAR allows filtering by country, type of repository, and sorting by repository name."[8]

ROARMAP

ROAR's companion Registry of Open Access Repository Mandates and Policies (ROARMAP) is a searchable international database of policies. It charts the growth of open access mandates and policies adopted by universities, research institutions and research funders that require their researchers to provide open access to their peer-reviewed research article output by depositing it in an open access repository.

It was created by EPrints at University of Southampton in 2003.[9] [10] [11] [12] [13] The Institutional Self-Archiving Policy Registry became the Registry of Open Access Repository Material Archiving Policies in 2006, then the Registry of Open Access Repositories Mandatory Archiving Policies, and then the Registry of Open Access Repository Mandates and Policies around 2014.[14]

ROARMAP mandates are classified in terms of strength and effectiveness[15] in MELIBEA[16] As of October 2015, open-access mandates have been adopted by more than 520 universities and more than 75 research funders worldwide.[17]

Notes and References

  1. Brody, T, Carr, L, Hey, JMN, Brown, A, Hitchcock, S (2007) PRONOM-ROAR: Adding Format Profiles to a Repository Registry to Inform Preservation Services. The International Journal of Digital Curation 2(2)
  2. McDowell, CS (2007) Evaluating Institutional Repository Deployment in American Academe Since Early 2005: Repositories by the Numbers D-Lib 13 (9/10)
  3. Xia . J. . 2011 . An anthropological emic-etic perspective on open access practices . Journal of Documentation . 67 . 1 . 75–94 . 10.1108/00220411111105461 .
  4. Krishnamurthy . M. . Kemparaju . T. D. . 2011 . Institutional repositories in Indian universities and research institutes . Program: Electronic Library & Information Systems . 45 . 2 . 185–198 . 10.1108/00330331111129723.
  5. Web site: https://web.archive.org/web/20040626082235/http://archives.eprints.org/ . Archives.eprints.org . 26 June 2004 . The Institutional Archive Registry tracks the number and size of open-access eprint archives . Tim Brody . dead .
  6. Web site: https://web.archive.org/web/20180212235633/http://legacy.earlham.edu/~peters/fos/2006/02/two-eprints-services-renamed.html . Open Access News . dead . 12 February 2018 . 22 February 2006 .
  7. Web site: Browse by Repository Type. ROAR. 22 October 2015.
  8. Patricia H. Dawson . Sharon Q. Yang . 2016 . Institutional Repositories, Open Access and Copyright: What Are the Practices and Implications? . Science & Technology Libraries . 35 . 4 . 279–294 . 10.1080/0194262X.2016.1224994 . 63819187 .
  9. Moskovkin, VM (2008) Institutional policies for open access to the results of scientific research . Scientific and Technical Information Processing. 35 (6) 269–273,
  10. Sale, AHJ (2007) The patchwork mandate . D-Lib Magazine, 13 (1/2).
  11. Manikandan, S; N Isai Vani (2010) "Restricting access to publications from funded research: Ethical issues and solutions." Journal of Postgraduate Medicine 56(2): 154–156
  12. Lyons, Charles; H Austin Booth (2010) "An Overview of Open Access in the Fields of Business and Management". Journal of Business & Finance Librarianship 16(2): 1080124
  13. Hurrell, A. C. (2012) Open access policies on scholarly publishing in the university context. BCLA Browser: Linking the Library Landscape, 4(3).
  14. Web site: https://web.archive.org/web/20141227204605/http://roarmap.eprints.org/ . 27 December 2014 . Roarmap.eprints.org . dead .
  15. Gargouri, Y., Lariviere, V., Gingras, Y., Brody, T., Carr, L., & Harnad, S. (2012). Testing the Finch Hypothesis on Green OA Mandate Ineffectiveness. arXiv preprint arXiv:1210.8174.
  16. Web site: MELIBEA directory and estimator of institutional open-access policies. 2016-11-06. https://web.archive.org/web/20180223005321/http://www.accesoabierto.net/politicas/default.php. 2018-02-23. dead.
  17. Web site: Browse by Policymaker Type. ROARMAP. 22 October 2015.

This article is licensed under the GNU Free Documentation License. It uses material from the Wikipedia article "Registry of Open Access Repositories".

Except where otherwise indicated, Everything.Explained.Today is © Copyright 2009-2024, A B Cryer, All Rights Reserved. Cookie policy.