Redology Explained
Redology is the academic study of Cao Xueqin's Dream of the Red Chamber,[1] one of the Four Great Classical Novels of China. There are numerous researchers in this field; most can be divided into four general groups: the first group are the commentators, such as Zhou Chun, Xu Fengyi, Chen Yupi, and others; the second group is the index group, which includes Wang Mengruan and Cai Yuanpei; the third group are the textual critics, including Hu Shih and Yu Pingbo; the final group are the literary critics, including Zhou Ruchang and Li Xifan.
History
A 1976 essay by Joey Bonner split the Chinese critical reception of the novel into five phases:[2]
- Pre-1791: Commentators on the pre-publication manuscripts, such as Rouge Inkstone and Odd Tablet, who mainly provide literary analysis of the first 80 chapters.
- 1791–1900: Post-publication questions over authorship of the addendum, speculation upon esoteric aspects of the book. After 1875 using the term "Redology" for the studies.
- 1900–1922: Political interpretations.
- 1922–1953: "New Redology" led by Hu Shih, approach questions of textual authenticity, documentation, dating, and a strong autobiographical focus. The labelling of previous periods as "Old Redology".
- 1954–current [1975]: Marxist literary criticism, the book seen as a criticism of society's failures. Li Xifan's criticism of both Old Redology and Neo-Redologists such as Hu Shih and Yu Pingbo.
Academic research institutes
There are many Redology academic institutions, especially university affiliated ones:
Further reading
- Zhou Ruchang. Between Noble and Humble: Cao Xueqin and the Dream of the Red Chamber, edited by Ronald R Gray and Mark S. Ferrara. New York:Peter Lang, 2009
External links
Notes and References
- [Jonathan Spence]
- Book: The Chinese Classic Novels (Routledge Revivals): An Annotated Bibliography of Chiefly English-Language Studies. 9781136836589. Berry. Margaret. 18 October 2010.
- Web site: 國際紅學研究中心 - 國立東華大學 . 2024-03-23 . rdrc.ndhu.edu.tw.