Redology Explained

Redology is the academic study of Cao Xueqin's Dream of the Red Chamber,[1] one of the Four Great Classical Novels of China. There are numerous researchers in this field; most can be divided into four general groups: the first group are the commentators, such as Zhou Chun, Xu Fengyi, Chen Yupi, and others; the second group is the index group, which includes Wang Mengruan and Cai Yuanpei; the third group are the textual critics, including Hu Shih and Yu Pingbo; the final group are the literary critics, including Zhou Ruchang and Li Xifan.

History

A 1976 essay by Joey Bonner split the Chinese critical reception of the novel into five phases:[2]

Pre-1791: Commentators on the pre-publication manuscripts, such as Rouge Inkstone and Odd Tablet, who mainly provide literary analysis of the first 80 chapters.
1791–1900: Post-publication questions over authorship of the addendum, speculation upon esoteric aspects of the book. After 1875 using the term "Redology" for the studies.
1900–1922: Political interpretations.
1922–1953: "New Redology" led by Hu Shih, approach questions of textual authenticity, documentation, dating, and a strong autobiographical focus. The labelling of previous periods as "Old Redology".
1954–current [1975]: Marxist literary criticism, the book seen as a criticism of society's failures. Li Xifan's criticism of both Old Redology and Neo-Redologists such as Hu Shih and Yu Pingbo.

Academic research institutes

There are many Redology academic institutions, especially university affiliated ones:

Further reading

External links

Notes and References

  1. [Jonathan Spence]
  2. Book: The Chinese Classic Novels (Routledge Revivals): An Annotated Bibliography of Chiefly English-Language Studies. 9781136836589. Berry. Margaret. 18 October 2010.
  3. Web site: 國際紅學研究中心 - 國立東華大學 . 2024-03-23 . rdrc.ndhu.edu.tw.