Red Sea Dam Explained

Red Sea Dam
Dam Crosses:Bab-el-Mandeb Strait
Location:Djibouti
Yemen
Dam Length:290NaN0
Plant Capacity:50,000 MW
Coordinates:12.5569°N 43.3722°W

The Red Sea Dam is a speculative macro-engineering proposal put forward in 2007 by a group of scientists and engineers.[1] Although the authors' intentions are to explore "the ethical and environmental dilemmas and some of the political implications of macro-engineering", the proposal has attracted both criticism and ridicule.[2]

Proposal

The idea is to dam the Red Sea at its southern end where the Bab-al-Mandab Strait is only 290NaN0 wide. Natural evaporation would rapidly lower the level of the enclosed Red Sea, by about 2.1 meters per year (6.8 feet per year).[3] Water rushing back into the sea would then drive turbines to generate electricity. The dam would have the potential to generate 50 gigawatts of emissions-free hydroelectric power. In comparison, the largest nuclear power plant in the United States has an output of 3.2 gigawatts.[4]

Implications

The proposal's authors point out that "Macro-engineering projects of this size cause massive destruction of existing ecologies", a point emphasized by critics[5] who note the damage caused by current, far smaller schemes.

The authors also note the benefits of the project. Besides helping to satisfy the region's growing energy needs, there are environmental benefits to the scheme: "On the positive side of the environmental scale, however, are the big reductions of greenhouse gas emissions, and the reduced pace of fossil hydrocarbon resource exhaustion".

Peter Bosshard,[6] policy director of International Rivers in California, an anti-dam organization, condemned the scheme as ludicrous.

See also

External links

Notes and References

  1. http://www.inderscience.com/search/index.php?action=record&rec_id=16114 Power from closing the Red Sea: Economic and ecological costs and benefits following the isolation of the Red Sea
  2. https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13015-red-sea-megadam-would-be-irresponsible.html New Scientist critique
  3. Web site: Andrea Thompson published. 2007-12-06. Dam on Red Sea Would Harm Environment. 2022-02-17. livescience.com. en.
  4. Web site: Ling. Frank. Dam the Red Sea for power?. 2022-02-17. CNET. en.
  5. http://www.livescience.com/environment/071206-redsea-dam.html Live Science on the environmental impact
  6. https://www.newscientist.com/article/dn13015-red-sea-megadam-would-be-irresponsible.html#.U00JXVVdUxg Red Sea mega-dam would be 'irresponsible'