Angola does not recognize same-sex marriages or civil unions. The Family Code of Angola recognises de facto unions but only for opposite-sex couples and bans same-sex marriage.
While many modern-day Angolan cultures historically practiced polygamy, there are no records of same-sex marriages as understood from a Western perspective being performed in those cultures. However, there is evidence for identities and behaviours that may be placed on the LGBT spectrum.[1] Early Europeans to visit modern-day Angola, including anthropologists, ethnologists and priests, reported "same-sex marriage ceremonies" among the Ovimbundu and Ambundu peoples, the two largest ethnic groups in Angola, as well as the smaller Ovambo and Herero peoples, who mostly live in neighboring Namibia.[2] Ambundu culture traditionally recognized "powerful diviner and medicine men" known as quimbanda, who were "reputed to gain [their] powers by ritual sodomy".[3] The Kimbundu: quimbanda "dress[ed], [sat], and [spoke] like women, and married men just as if they were women". Queen Nzinga of Ndongo and Matamba is known to have acquired a harem of wives, who were biologically male but dressed as women and took on female gender roles.[4] Ovimbundu society likewise recognized people fulfilling a third gender role, known as Umbundu: chibanda, who "[were] men attyred like women, and behave[d] themselves womanly […] and also married to men". British-American ethnologist Wilfrid Dyson Hambly reported in 1937 that an Ovimbundu informant had said that in Mbundu society, "There are men who want men, and women who want women."[5] [6]
These customs gradually disappeared with modernization and the introduction of Christianity and Western culture to Angola during colonisation.[7] In 2007, a local anthropologist was quoted as saying, "Angolan society is not yet prepared to accept homosexuals. The local culture, which is influenced by Christianity, calls for the perpetuation and expansion of the family. Homosexuality is therefore viewed as an affront to the laws of nature."
Due to family pressure, many gay men "use marriage as a way of avoiding stigma, but once married, continue to have occasional sex with other men."[8] The National Institute for the Fight Against AIDS (INLS) has reported that this taboo has impacts in the fight against HIV/AIDS in Angola, as messages about safe sex were "exclusively tailored to heterosexuals", leaving gay people "neither informed nor protected".
On 6 May 2005, a same-sex couple, Aleksander Gregório, 21, and his partner, known only as Bruno, 23, held a marriage ceremony at the Hotel Presidente in Luanda and signed a letter of commitment in the presence of a retired notary. The ceremony was labelled as "shameless" and "abominable" on the front pages of national newspapers.[9]
The Constitution of Angola does not explicitly forbid same-sex marriages. Article 35 deals with family, marriage and filiation, and establishes associated recognition and rights. It states that "men and women are equal within the family, society and the state, enjoying the same rights and having the same duties." It further states that:[10] [11] [12] [13] [14]
(The family is the basic nucleus of social organisation and shall be the object of special protection by the state, whether based on marriage or on a de facto union between a man and a woman.)
De facto unions (Portuguese: união de facto) are regulated by the Family Code and can only be recognised if "all legal requirements for the celebrationof marriage are met". Article 112 of the Code defines de facto unions as the "voluntary establishment of common life between a man and a woman". Hence, these unions are available only to opposite-sex couples. In 2020, there were more de facto unions performed in Angola than marriages.[15] Article 20 of the Family Code defines marriage as "the voluntary union between a man and a woman."[16] The United Nations Development Programme reported in 2021 that "this regime of family law significantly curtails LGBTI peoples' fundamental rights, and also impacts other laws, resulting in the rights derived from marriage and family being denied to LGBTI persons (e.g. the right of a spouse not to testify before a court of law)."[17]
In 2013, discussions on modifications to the Family Code to recognize same-sex unions were vehemently opposed by religious groups.[18]
The Catholic Church opposes same-sex marriage and does not allow its priests to officiate at such marriages. In December 2023, the Holy See published Fiducia supplicans, a declaration allowing Catholic priests to bless couples who are not considered to be married according to church teaching, including the blessing of same-sex couples.[19] However, the Episcopal Conference of Angola and São Tomé expressed "perplexity" at the declaration, and issued a statement that "regarding informal blessings for 'irregular couples' (homosexuals), although it is a sacrament different from the liturgical blessing, we consider that, in our cultural and ecclesial context, it would create enormous scandal and confusion among the faithful, so we have determined that it should not be carried out in Angola and São Tomé."[20] [21]