Reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada by Justice Moldaver explained

Michael J. Moldaver
Office:	Puisne Justice of the Supreme Court of Canada
Honorific-Prefix:	The Honourable
Nominator:	Stephen Harper
Termstart:	October 21, 2011
Birth Date:	23 December 1947
Birth Place:	Peterborough, Ontario
Alma Mater:	University of Toronto University of Toronto Faculty of Law
Occupation:	Jurist
Profession:	Lawyer

This article is a list of Justice Michael Moldaver's written judgments during his tenure as puisne justice of the Supreme Court of Canada.

2012

bgcolor=#CCCCCC Statistics align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px 11 Majority or Plurality width=25px align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE 0 Concurrence width=25px align=center width=25px bgcolor=white 0 Other width=25px align=center width=25px bgcolor=red 0 Dissent width=25px align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE 0 Concurrence/dissent white-space: nowrap Total = 11 Written opinions = 11 Oral opinions = 0 Unanimous decisions = 6

width=25px	!	width=30%	Case name !	Issue	width=15%	Co-authored by !	width=15%	Joined by
	align=left valign=top	R v Tse 2012 SCC 16 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/8002/index.do	valign=top	Whether s. 184.4 of the Criminal Code infringes the right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure under s. 8 of the Charter	Karakatsanis J	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Jesse 2012 SCC 21 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/8008/index.do	valign=top	Admissibility of similar fact evidence	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Entertainment Software Association v Society of Composers, Authors and Music Publishers of Canada 2012 SCC 34 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/9994/index.do	valign=top	Intellectual property and whether the transmission of musical works contained in a video game through an Internet download is a communication "to the public" under the federal Copyright Act	Abella J	McLachlin CJ and Deschamps and Karakatsanis JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Vu 2012 SCC 40 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/10001/index.do	valign=top	Offence of kidnapping and whether kidnapping is a continuing offence encompassing subsequent confinement of victim, and whether persons who knowingly choose to participate in subsequent confinement becomes parties to the offence of kidnapping	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Walle 2012 SCC 41 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/10002/index.do	valign=top	Offence of murder and whether trial judge erred in resorting to common sense inference that a person who usually knows predictable consequences of actions and means to bring them about without first considering the whole of the evidence bearing on the accused's mental state at time of shooting	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Prokofiew 2012 SCC 49 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/10011/index.do	valign=top	Co-accused's counsel inviting jury to infer accused's guilt from a failure to testify, and whether the trial judge's failure to give explicit remedial instruction in charge to jury constituted a legal error under s. 4(6) of the Canada Evidence Act	–	Deschamps, Abella, Rothstein and Karakatsanis JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Opitz v Wrzesnewskyj 2012 SCC 55 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/12635/index.do	valign=top	Application to have federal election result annulled on the basis of "irregularities... that affected the result of the election" under s. 531(2) of the Canada Elections Act	Rothstein J	Deschamps and Abella JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Nedelcu 2012 SCC 59 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/12678/index.do	valign=top	Whether Crown at criminal trial may cross examine an accused on prior inconsistent statements without infringing the right against self-incrimination under s. 13 of the Charter	–	McLachlin CJ and Deschamps, Abella, Rothstein and Karakatsanis JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Aucoin 2012 SCC 66 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/12743/index.do	valign=top	Whether pat-down search was unreasonable under s. 8 of the Charter; Whether detention of the accused was unlawful under s. 9 of the Charter; Whether evidence ought to be excluded pursuant to s. 24(2) of the Charter	–	Deschamps, Abella, Rothstein and Karakatsanis JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Yumnu 2012 SCC 73 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/12782/index.do	valign=top	Whether it was appropriate for the Crown to seek police criminal record checks of prospective jurors and also to provide comments on whether any prospective jurors were "disreputable persons"; Where same should have been disclosed to the accused; Whether there is a reasonable possibility that same affected trial fairness or gave rise to an appearance of unfairness, such that a miscarriage of justice occurred	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Emms 2012 SCC 74 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/12781/index.do	valign=top	Whether it was appropriate for the Crown to seek police criminal record checks of prospective jurors and also to provide comments on whether any prospective jurors were "disreputable persons"; Where same should have been disclosed to the accused; Whether there is a reasonable possibility that same affected trial fairness or gave rise to an appearance of unfairness, such that a miscarriage of justice occurred	–	Unanimous

2013

bgcolor=#CCCCCC Statistics align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px 5 Majority or Plurality width=25px align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE 3 Concurrence width=25px align=center width=25px bgcolor=white 0 Other width=25px align=center width=25px bgcolor=red 1 Dissent width=25px align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE 0 Concurrence/dissent white-space: nowrap Total = 9 Written opinions = 9 Oral opinions = 0 Unanimous decisions = 2

width=25px	!	width=30%	Case name !	Issue	width=15%	Co-authored by !	width=15%	Joined by
	align=left valign=top	R v JF 2013 SCC 12 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/12877/index.do	valign=top	Whether a person can be a party to the offence of conspiracy	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v TELUS Communications Co 2013 SCC 16 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/12936/index.do	valign=top	Whether the general warrant power under s. 487.01 of the Criminal Code can authorize prospective production of future text messages from telecommunications service provider's database	–	Karakatsanis J
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Ediger v Johnston 2013 SCC 18 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/12961/index.do	valign=top	Tort of negligence	Rothstein J	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v ADH 2013 SCC 28 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13051/index.do	valign=top	Whether the mens rea for the offence of child abandonment under s. 218 of the Criminal Code is subjective or objective	–	Rothstein J
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Communications, Energy and Paperworkers Union of Canada, Local 30 v Irving Pulp & Paper, Ltd 2013 SCC 34 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13106/index.do	valign=top	Labour arbitration and collective agreement management rights clauses	Rothstein J	McLachlin CJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Baldree 2013 SCC 35 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13136/index.do	valign=top	Admissibility of hearsay evidence	–	–
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v MacKenzie 2013 SCC 50 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13265/index.do	valign=top	Unreasonable search and seizure and exclusion of evidence under ss. 8 and 24(2) of the Charter	–	Abella, Rothstein, Karakatsanis and Wagner JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	McLean v British Columbia (Securities Commission) 2013 SCC 67 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13370/index.do	valign=top	Judicial review and standard of review of securities commission decision	–	LeBel, Fish, Rothstein, Cromwell and Wagner JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Wood v Schaeffer 2013 SCC 71 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13388/index.do	valign=top	Whether police officers have right to consult with counsel before making notes on an incident; Whether police officers are entitled to basic legal advice as to the nature of rights and obligations in connection with an incident	–	McLachlin CJ and Abella, Rothstein, Karakatsanis and Wagner JJ

2014

bgcolor=#CCCCCC 2014 statistics align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px 9 Majority or Plurality width=25px align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE 2 Concurrence width=25px align=center width=25px bgcolor=white 0 Other width=25px align=center width=25px bgcolor=red 1 Dissent width=25px align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE 0 Concurrence/dissent white-space: nowrap Total = 12 Written opinions = 9 Oral opinions = 3 Unanimous decisions = 5

width=25px	!	width=30%	Case name !	Issue	width=15%	Co-authored by !	width=15%	Joined by
	align=left valign=top	R v WEB 2014 SCC 2 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13423/index.do	valign=top	Ineffective assistance of counsel	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v MacDonald 2014 SCC 3 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13410/index.do	valign=top	Unreasonable search and seizure	Wagner J	Rothstein J
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v James 2014 SCC 5 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13425/index.do	valign=top	Offence of sexual assault; Evidence	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Flaviano 2014 SCC 14 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13485/index.do	valign=top	Offence of sexual assault and defence of mistaken belief in consent	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Sekhon 2014 SCC 15 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13486/index.do	valign=top	Admissibility of expert evidence	–	Abella, Rothstein, Karakatsanis and Wagner JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Babos 2014 SCC 16 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13487/index.do	valign=top	Stay of proceedings and abuse of process	–	McLachlin CJ and LeBel, Cromwell, Karakatsanis and Wagner JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Hutchinson 2014 SCC 19 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13511/index.do	valign=top	Offence of sexual assault and consent	Abella J	Karakatsanis J
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Reference Re Supreme Court Act, ss 5 and 6 2014 SCC 21 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/13544/index.do	valign=top	Eligibility requirements to the Supreme Court of Canada	–	–
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Anderson 2014 SCC 41 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14222/index.do	valign=top	Whether s. 7 of the Charter requires the Crown to consider aboriginal status in seeking mandatory minimum sentences	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Hart 2014 SCC 52 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14301/index.do	valign=top	Admissibility of "Mr. Big" confessions	–	McLachlin CJ and LeBel, Abella and Wagner JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Mack 2014 SCC 58 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14355/index.do	valign=top	Admissibility of "Mr. Big" confessions	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Wakeling v United States of America 2014 SCC 72 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14439/index.do	valign=top	Unreasonable search and seizure under s. 8 of the Charter and the disclosure of intercepted private communications without consent	–	LeBel and Rothstein JJ

2015

bgcolor=#CCCCCC Statistics align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px 6 Majority or Plurality width=25px align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE 3 Concurrence width=25px align=center width=25px bgcolor=white 2 Other width=25px align=center width=25px bgcolor=red 2 Dissent width=25px align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE 2 Concurrence/dissent white-space: nowrap Total = 6 Written opinions = 3 Oral opinions = 3 Unanimous decisions = 3

width=25px	!	width=32.5%	Case name !	Issue	width=15%	Co-authored by !	width=15%	Joined by
	align=left valign=top	Canada (AG) v Federation of Law Societies of Canada 2015 SCC 7 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14639/index.do	valign=top	Whether Proceeds of Crime (Money Laundering) and Terrorist Financing Act, as it applies to the legal profession, infringes the right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure and the right not to be deprived of liberty otherwise in accordance with principles of fundamental justice under ss. 8 and 7 of the Charter, respectively	McLachlin CJ	–
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Loyola High School v Quebec (AG) 2015 SCC 12 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/14703/index.do	valign=top	Proper approach to judicial review of discretionary administrative decisions engaging Charter protections; Whether decision of Minister of Education, Recreation and Sports requiring a proposed alternative program being entirely secular in approach is reasonable given the statutory objectives of the program and s. 2(a) of the Charter, and whether the decision limits freedom of religion under s. 3 of the Quebec Charter of Human Rights and Freedoms	McLachlin CJ	Rothstein J
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Nur 2015 SCC 15 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/15272/index.do	valign=top	Constitutionality of mandatory minimum sentences on grounds of cruel and unusual punishment under s. 12 of the Charter	–	Rothstein and Wagner JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Henry v British Columbia (AG) 2015 SCC 24 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/15329/index.do	valign=top	Wrongful conviction of claimant; Civil action alleging breach of Charter rights resulting from Crown counsel's wrongful non-disclose of relevant information; Whether s. 24(1) authorizes courts to award damages against Crown for wrongful non-disclosure, and the level of fault claimant must establish to meet liability threshold for awarding s. 24(1) damages	–	Abella, Wagner and Gascon JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Kokopenace 2015 SCC 28 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/15373/index.do	valign=top	Appropriate legal test for representativeness on jury roll; Jury representativeness under ss. 11(d) and (f) and 15 of the Charter	–	Rothstein, Wagner and Gascon JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Tatton 2015 SCC 33 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/15397/index.do	valign=top	Whether arson is a general or specific intent offence; Accused relying on self-induced intoxication as a defence for committing arson	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Rodgerson 2015 SCC 38 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/15456/index.do	valign=top	Whether trial judge erred in instructions to jury on concealment and clean-up of body in a murder charge and same's bearing on issue of intent for murder, and if so, whether that error was fatal in conjunction with erroneous instructions on accused's flight from and lies to police; Impact of long and complex jury charges on criminal justice system	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Simpson 2015 SCC 40 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/15477/index.do	valign=top	Defence of colour of right	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Wilson v British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles) 2015 SCC 47 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/15549/index.do	valign=top	Whether a peace officer is entitled to rely on results of an approved screening device used to collect breath samples to impose a driving prohibition, or whether other confirmatory evidence is required; Whether Superintendent of Motor Vehicles's interpretation of a statutory provision imposing immediate driving prohibition under the provincial Motor Vehicles Act was reasonable	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Kanthasamy v Canada (Citizenship and Immigration) 2015 SCC 61 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/15665/index.do	valign=top	Whether decision of Minister of Citizenship and Immigration to deny relief to claimant seeking humanitarian and compassionate exemption to apply for permanent residence from within Canada was a reasonable exercise of humanitarian and compassionate discretion under the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act	–	Wagner J

• Canada (AG) v Federation of Law Societies of Canada, 2015 SCC 7 (Dissent - Concurrence)^[1]
• Loyola High School v Quebec (AG), 2015 SCC 12 (Dissent - Concurrence)^[2]
• R v Nur, 2015 SCC 15 (Dissent)^[3]
• Henry v British Columbia (AG), 2015 SCC 24 (Majority)^[4]
• R v Kokopenace, 2015 SCC 28 (Majority)^[5]
• R v Tatton, 2015 SCC 33 (Unanimous)^[6]
• R v Rodgerson, 2015 SCC 38 (Unanimous)^[7]
• R v Simpson, 2015 SCC 40 (Unanimous)^[8]
• Wilson v British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2015 SCC 47 (Unanimous)^[9]
• Kanthasamy v Canada (Citizen and Immigration), 2015 SCC 61 (Dissent)^[10]

2016

• R v Seruhungo, 2016 SCC 2 (Dissent)^[11]
• R v Spicer, 2016 SCC 3 (Unanimous)^[12]
• Carter v Canada (AG), 2016 SCC 4 (Dissent - Concurrence)^[13]
• World Bank Group v Wallace, 2016 SCC 15 (Unanimous)^[14]
• R v Saeed, 2016 SCC 24 (Majority)^[15]
• R v Vassell, 2016 SCC 26 (Unanimous)^[16]
• R v Jordan, 2016 SCC 27 (Majority)^[17]
• R v Williamson, 2016 SCC 28 (Majority)^[18]
• R v Anthony-Cook, 2016 SCC 43 (Majority)^[19]
• Morasse v Nadeau-Dubois, 2016 SCC 44 (Concurrence)^[20]
• Windsor (City of) v Canadian Transit Co, 2016 SCC 54 (Dissent)^[21]

2017

bgcolor=#CCCCCC Michael Moldaver 2017 statistics align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px 7 Majority or Plurality width=25px align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE 1 Concurrence width=25px align=center width=25px bgcolor=white 0 Other width=25px align=center width=25px bgcolor=red 6 Dissent width=25px align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE 0 Concurrence/dissent white-space: nowrap Total = 14 Written opinions = 12 Oral opinions = 2 Unanimous decisions = 5

Criminal law = 9

width=25px	!	width=30%	Case name !	Issue	width=15%	Co-authored by !	width=15%	Joined by
	align=left valign=top	Ernst v Alberta Energy Regulator 2017 SCC 1 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16325/index.do	valign=top	Freedom of expression and Charter damages	McLachlin CJ and Brown J	Côté J
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Awer 2017 SCC 3 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16344/index.do	valign=top	Sexual assault	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Paterson 2017 SCC 15 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16484/index.do	valign=top	Constitutional law – search and seizure	–	Gascon J
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Oland 2017 SCC 17 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16486/index.do	valign=top	Criminal law – Applications for release pending appeal	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Stewart v Elk Valley Coal Corp 2017 SCC 30 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16679/index.do	valign=top	Discrimination based on mental and physical disability	Wagner J	–
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Teal Cedar Products Ltd v British Columbia 2017 SCC 32 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16694/index.do	valign=top	Standard of review of commercial arbitration awards	Côté J	Brown and Rowe JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Bradshaw 2017 SCC 35 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16702/index.do	valign=top	Admissibility of hearsay evidence	–	Côté J
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Alex 2017 SCC 37 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16714/index.do	valign=top	Admissibility of breath sample evidence	–	Karakatsanis, Wagner, Gascon and Côté JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	India v Badesha 2017 SCC 44 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16771/index.do	valign=top	Judicial review of extradition orders; standard of review	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Durham Region Crime Stoppers Inc 2017 SCC 45 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16786/index.do	valign=top	Evidentiary privilege of anonymous informers	–	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Bourgeois 2017 SCC 49 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16802/index.do	valign=top	Sexual assault	–	Unanimous (oral)
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Ktunaxa Nation v British Columbia (Forests, Lands and Natural Resource Operations) 2017 SCC 54 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16816/index.do	valign=top	Freedom of religion	–	Côté J
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Sciascia 2017 SCC 57 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16852/index.do	valign=top	Jurisdiction of provincial court trial judge	–	Abella, Karakatsanis, Wagner, Gascon and Rowe JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Marakah 2017 SCC 59 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/16896/index.do	valign=top	Constitutional law – Admissibility of evidence derived from unreasonable search and seizure	–	Côté J

2013

• R. v. TELUS Communications Co., 2013 SCC 16
• R. v. A.D.H., 2013 SCC 28
• R. v. Baldree, 2013 SCC 35
• R. v. MacKenzie, 2013 SCC 50
• McLean v. British Columbia (Securities Commission), 2013 SCC 67
• Wood v. Schaeffer, 2013 SCC 71

2014

• R. v. Sekhon, 2014 SCC 15
• R. v. Babos, 2014 SCC 16
• Reference re Supreme Court Act, ss. 5 and 6, 2014 SCC 21
• R. v. Anderson, 2014 SCC 41
• R. v. Hart, 2014 SCC 52
• R. v. Mack, 2014 SCC 58
• Wakeling v. United States of America, 2014 SCC 72

2015

• R. v. Nur, 2015 SCC 15
• Henry v. British Columbia (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 24
• R. v. Kokopenace, 2015 SCC 28
• R. v. Tatton, 2015 SCC 33
• R. v. Rodgerson, 2015 SCC 38
• Kanthasamy v. Canada (Citizenship and Immigration), 2015 SCC 61

2019

• R. v. Bird, 2019 SCC 7
• R. v. Morrison, 2019 SCC 15
• TELUS Communications Inc. v. Wellman, 2019 SCC 19
• R. v. Barton, 2019 SCC 33
• R. v. Le, 2019 SCC 34
• R. v. Goldfinch, 2019 SCC 38
• R. v. Rafilovich, 2019 SCC 51
• R. v. K.J.M., 2019 SCC 55

2020

• R. v. K.G.K., 2020 SCC 7, [2020] 1 SCR 364
• R. v. Ahmad, 2020 SCC 11, [2020] 1 SCR 577
• Reference re Genetic Non‑Discrimination Act, 2020 SCC 17, [2020] 2 SCR 283

2021

• R. v. R.V., 2021 SCC 10
• R. v. Desautel, 2021 SCC 17
• Canada v. Canada North Group Inc., 2021 SCC 30
• Grant Thornton LLP v. New Brunswick, 2021 SCC 31
• R. v. Khill, 2021 SCC 37
• R. v. Parranto, 2021 SCC 46
• R. v. Cowan, 2021 SCC 45

2022

• R. v. Ali, 2022 SCC 1
• R. v. A.E., 2022 SCC 4
• R. v. Samaniego, 2022 SCC 9
• R. v. Gerrard, 2022 SCC 13
• R. v. Dussault, 2022 SCC 16
• R. v. Badger, 2022 SCC 20
• R. v. J.J., 2022 SCC 28
• R. v. Nahanee, 2022 SCC 37

See also

• • • • • • 2012 Decisions: CanLII 2012 Reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada 2013 Decisions: CanLII 2013 Reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada 2014 Decisions: CanLII 2014 Reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada 2015 Decisions: CanLII 2015 Reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada 2016 Decisions: CanLII 2016 Reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada 2017 Decisions: CanLII 2017 Reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada

Notes and References

1. Web site: Canada (Attorney General) v Federation of Law Societies of Canada, 2015 SCC 7. CanLII.
2. Web site: Loyola High School v Quebec (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 12. CanLII.
3. Web site: R v Nur, 2015 SCC 15. CanLII.
4. Web site: Henry v British Columbia (Attorney General), 2015 SCC 24. CanLII.
5. Web site: R v Kokopenace, 2015 SCC 28. CanLII.
6. Web site: R v Tatton, 2015 SCC 33. CanLII.
7. Web site: R v Rodgerson, 2015 SCC 38. CanLII.
8. Web site: R v Simpson, 2015 SCC 40. CanLII.
9. Web site: Wilson v British Columbia (Superintendent of Motor Vehicles), 2015 SCC 47. CanLII.
10. Web site: Kanthasamy v Canada (Citizen and Immigration), 2015 SCC 61. CanLII.
11. Web site: R v Seruhungo, 2016 SCC 2. CanLII.
12. Web site: R v Spicer, 2016 SCC 3. CanLII.
13. Web site: Carter v Canada (Attorney General), 2016 SCC 4. CanLII.
14. Web site: World Bank Group v Wallace, 2016 SCC 15. CanLII.
15. Web site: R v Saeed, 2016 SCC 24. CanLII.
16. Web site: R v Vassell, 2016 SCC 26. CanLII.
17. Web site: R v Jordan, 2016 SCC 27. CanLII.
18. Web site: R v Williamson, 2016 SCC 28. CanLII.
19. Web site: R v Anthony-Cook, 2016 SCC 43. CanLII.
20. Web site: Morasse v Nadeau-Dubois, 2016 SCC 44. CanLII.
21. Web site: Windsor (City) v Canadian Transit Co., 2016 SCC 54. CanLII.