Reasons of the Supreme Court of Canada by Justice Charron explained

This is a list of all the reasons written by Louise Charron during her tenure as puisne justice of the Supreme Court of Canada.

2005

bgcolor=#CCCCCC

Louise Charron 2005 statistics

align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px

11

Majority or Plurality

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE

0

Concurrence

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=white

1

Other

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=red

3

Dissent

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE

0

Concurrence/dissent

white-space: nowrap

Total =

15

Written opinions = 0

Oral opinions = 0

white-space: nowrap colspan=2 valign=top

Unanimous decisions: 0

Most joined by:

Least joined by:

width=25px	!	width=45%	Case name !	Issue	Joined by
	align=left valign=top	R. v. Krymowski [2005] 1 S.C.R. 101; 2005 SCC 7 https://web.archive.org/web/20071121014101/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc7/2005scc7.html	valign=top	Hate speech towards Gypsies	width=20% valign=top	unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=4 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Tsiaprailis v. Canada [2005] 1 S.C.R. 113; 2005 SCC 8 https://web.archive.org/web/20070311042349/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc8/2005scc8.html	valign=top	Income tax; disability	width=20% valign=top	Bastarache, Binnie and Deschamps JJ.
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=4 valign=top
oral	align=left valign=top	R. v. P.E.C. [2005] 1 S.C.R. 290; 2005 SCC 19 https://web.archive.org/web/20071121041402/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc19/2005scc19.html	valign=top	Evidence	width=20% valign=top	unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=4 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R. v. Paice [2005] 1 S.C.R. 339; 2005 SCC 22 https://web.archive.org/web/20070311011401/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc22/2005scc22.html	valign=top	Defence of consent; R. v. Jobidon	width=20% valign=top	Major, Binnie, LeBel, Deschamps and Abella JJ.
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=4 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	H.L. v. Canada (Attorney General) [2005] 1 S.C.R. 401; 2005 SCC 25 https://web.archive.org/web/20070317120108/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc25/2005scc25.html	valign=top	Standard of appellate review	width=20% valign=top	None
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=4 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R. v. Gunning [2005] 1 S.C.R. 627; 2005 SCC 27 https://web.archive.org/web/20071120112829/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc27/2005scc27.html	valign=top	jury direction	width=20% valign=top	unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=4 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R. v. Orbanski; R. v. Elias [2005] 2 S.C.R. 3; 2005 SCC 37 https://web.archive.org/web/20071121041437/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc37/2005scc37.html	valign=top	Right to counsel, road-side sobriety tests	width=20% valign=top	McLachlin C.J. and Major, Bastarache, Binnie, Deschamps and Abella JJ.
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=4 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Mugesera v. Canada (Minister of Citizenship and Immigration) [2005] 2 S.C.R. 100; 2005 SCC 40 https://web.archive.org/web/20070311042216/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc40/2005scc40.html	valign=top	Judicial review; crimes outside of country; crimes against humanity	width=20% valign=top	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=4 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R. v. Hamilton [2005] 2 S.C.R. 432; 2005 SCC 47 https://web.archive.org/web/20060708115139/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc47/2005scc47.html	valign=top	Mens rea for criminal counselling; e-mail fraud	width=20% valign=top	Major and Abella JJ.
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=4 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R. v. Pires; R. v. Lising [2005] 3 S.C.R. 343; 2005 SCC 66 https://web.archive.org/web/20071121041605/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc66/2005scc66.html	valign=top	Cross-examination; interception of private communications; charter rights	width=20% valign=top	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R. v. Boucher [2005] 3 S.C.R. 499; 2005 SCC 72 https://web.archive.org/web/20071013230508/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc72/2005scc72.html	valign=top	Breathalizer evidence	width=20% valign=top	Binnie, LeBel and Fish JJ.
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=4 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Charlebois v. Saint John (City) [2005] 3 S.C.R. 563; 2005 SCC 74 https://web.archive.org/web/20071121014114/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc74/2005scc74.html	valign=top	Language rights	width=20% valign=top	McLachlin C.J. and Major, Fish and Abella JJ.
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=4 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R. v. MacKay [2005] 3 S.C.R. 725; 2005 SCC 79 https://web.archive.org/web/20071120112929/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc79/2005scc79.html	valign=top	Aggravated assault	width=20% valign=top	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=4 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	May v. Ferndale Institution [2005] 3 S.C.R. 809; 2005 SCC 82 https://web.archive.org/web/20071121014132/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc82/2005scc82.html	valign=top	Habeas Corpus; transfer of prison inmates	width=20% valign=top	Major and Bastarache JJ.
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=3 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R. v. Wiles [2005] 3 S.C.R. 895; 2005 SCC 84 https://web.archive.org/web/20071120094445/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2005/2005scc84/2005scc84.html	valign=top	Cruel and Unusual punishment; charter rights; firearm prohibition for cannabis conviction	width=20% valign=top	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=4 valign=top

2006

bgcolor=#CCCCCC

Louise Charron 2006 statistics

align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px

7

Majority or Plurality

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE

0

Concurrence

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=white

0

Other

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=red

0

Dissent

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE

0

Concurrence/dissent

white-space: nowrap

Total =

7

Written reasons = ?

Oral reasons = ?

white-space: nowrap colspan=2 valign=top

Unanimous decisions: ?

Most joined by:

Least joined by:

width=25px	!	width=45%	Case name !	Issue	width=15%	Co-authored by!	width=15%	Joined by
	align=left valign=top	Multani v. Commission scolaire Marguerite‑Bourgeoys 2006 SCC 6 https://web.archive.org/web/20060711032155/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc6/2006scc6.html	valign=top	Section 2(a) of the Charter; freedom of religion	valign=top	None	valign=top	McLachlin, Bastarache, Binnie and Fish
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R. v. Pittiman 1 S.C.R. _; 2006 SCC 9 https://web.archive.org/web/20060909144218/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc9/2006scc9.html	valign=top	reasonabless of jury conviction	valign=top	None	width=20% valign=top	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R. v. Rodgers [2006] 1 S.C.R. 554, 2006 SCC 15 https://web.archive.org/web/20060711033457/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc15/2006scc15.html	valign=top	Charter rights; Use of DNA evidence	valign=top	None	valign=top	McLachlin C.J. and Bastarache and Abella JJ.
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R. v. B.W.P.; R. v. B.V.N. 2006 SCC 27 https://web.archive.org/web/20060710023859/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc27/2006scc27.html	valign=top	Sentencing young offenders	valign=top	None	valign=top	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R. v. Shoker 2006 SCC 44 https://web.archive.org/web/20090210091513/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc44/2006scc44.html	valign=top	Probation	valign=top	None	valign=top	McLachlin C.J. and Binnie, Fish and Abella JJ.
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R. v. Angelillo 2006 SCC 55 https://web.archive.org/web/20070107031642/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc55/2006scc55.html	valign=top	Sentencing with past convictions	valign=top	None	valign=top	McLachlin C.J. and Bastarache, LeBel and Deschamps JJ.
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R. v. Khelawon 2006 SCC 57 https://web.archive.org/web/20070107031337/http://scc.lexum.umontreal.ca/en/2006/2006scc57/2006scc57.html	valign=top	Hearsay exception	valign=top	None	valign=top	Unanimous
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top

2010

bgcolor=#CCCCCC

Statistics

align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px

XXXXX

Majority or Plurality

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE

XXX

Concurrence

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=white

XXXX

Other

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=red

XXXX

Dissent

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE

XXXX

Concurrence/dissent

white-space: nowrap

Total =

XXXXXX

Written opinions = XXX

Oral opinions = XXX

Unanimous decisions = XXX

width=25px	!	width=32.5%	Case name !	Issue	width=15%	Co-authored by !	width=15%	Joined by
	align=left valign=top	XXX CITATIONS [URL]	valign=top	XXX	XXX	XXX
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	XXX CITATIONS [URL]	valign=top	XXX	XXX	XXX

2011

bgcolor=#CCCCCC

Statistics

align=center bgcolor=#00CD00 width=25px

XXXXX

Majority or Plurality

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#00B2EE

XXX

Concurrence

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=white

XXXX

Other

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=red

XXXX

Dissent

width=25px

align=center width=25px bgcolor=#B23AEE

XXXX

Concurrence/dissent

white-space: nowrap

Total =

XXXXXX

Written opinions = XXX

Oral opinions = XXX

Unanimous decisions = XXX

width=25px	!	width=32.5%	Case name !	Issue	width=15%	Co-authored by !	width=15%	Joined by
	align=left valign=top	R v White 2011 SCC 13 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7926/index.do	valign=top	Whether the trial judge's failure to state to the jury that post-offence conduct has no probative value constituted an error of law	XXX	Deschamps J
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v JAA 2011 SCC 17 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7930/index.do	valign=top	Admission of fresh evidence	–	McLachlin CJ and Binnie, Fish and Cromwell JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	Canada (Information Commissioner) v Canada (Minister of National Defence) 2011 SCC 25 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7939/index.do	valign=top	Access to information	–	McLachlin CJ and Binnie, Deschamps, Fish, Abella, Rothstein and Cromwell JJ
bgcolor=#EEEEEE colspan=5 valign=top
	align=left valign=top	R v Katigbak 2011 SCC 48 https://scc-csc.lexum.com/scc-csc/scc-csc/en/item/7964/index.do	valign=top	Possession of child pornography and statutory defences	McLachlin CJ	Binnie, Deschamps, Abella, Rothstein and Cromwell JJ